Preview

Tylor's Animism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tylor's Animism
It is without a doubt that there are many anthropological theories of religion known now, but E.B. Tylor was the first to truly state the relation between the explanation of religion and anthropology. He analyzed religion from a strictly naturalistic viewpoint, identifying its cause and effect on society and theorizing its role. James George Frazer, a close follower of Tylor's work, built upon Tylor's theories to expand on his own. Both anthropologists grew up in strict Protestant households, yet later went on to question the nature behind the foundations of religion. E.B. Tylor viewed animism as the heart and foundation of all religion, and based many of his speculations from that observation. Animism, and consequently religion to Tylor, …show more content…
Yes, every culture had formed these Animistic views to find comfort and rationality, but now that modern science was becoming more prevalent, Tylor and Frazer felt religion should be left in the past. Tylor thought of it as a device mankind was still clinging on to, like an old toy from childhood that society should be done with now that we as a species have matured. Frazer agreed that religion should be something of a past stage. An improvement of primitive magic, but a step below modern science. Both of them grew up in devout Christian environments that they ended up consequently rejecting to pursue these theories. To them, religion needed to disappear for society to advance to the next level: modern …show more content…
It was simply a primitive and anthropologically explainable way we asserted good and bad in separate cultures.
This is a much less accusatory way than the Enlightenment criticized religion, which rebelled violently as they felt it was toxic and threatening to society. Those of the Enlightenment believed religion to be the end of morality and the perfect tool for the powerful to use against the masses. Tylor and Frazer did not find this same conclusion in their studies, as they only felt religion to be an obvious outcome of society. In terms of method, E.B. Tylor and James Frazer were the first to use sociology and anthropology in their theory of religion. They were pioneers for the two fields, and explorers in the greatest sense. They felt religion was simply outdated, considering the rise of modern science, and that it would soon completely disappear. This is not to say that Tylor and Frazer felt religion was the product of stupidity. In fact, they saw it as a very logical answer to the questions all societies inevitably

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    He achieves this by combining theoretical foundations in truth, which is represented by the Word of God and illuminated by the Holy Bible which transcends into people’s lives within society. Psychology is represented by what Entwistle refers to as the book of Gods work which is illuminated by God creating human beings with all types of behavior. This book is written with precision appealing to all who are seeking to be tools used by the Holy Spirit. This book covers recent literature based on the history philosophy, theology, and psychology. Difficult areas of study or highlighted allowing the reader to evaluate the material through their own view point of integration and draw their own conclusions. Christianity and Psychology or viewed as two opposing views that should never intertwine, never the less this point is being illegitimated in the book. Entwistle (2010)…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 1: EB Tylor

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. EB Tylor states religion is rooted in spirit worship, and is a common aspect of most religions. This particular aspect of religion strikes a chord with me in that worship is a central element in many religion, as well as thoughts on man’s spirit and the afterlife His notion is not far off when you consider that Jesus said, “God is Spirit and those who worship him must worship him in Spirit and truth”. The fact that God is in control of everything, and that he is worthy of all our worship, his views at least acknowledge the existence of a God.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Entwistle

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Entwistle also explained how theology and psychology are integrated. “The interaction of psychology and theology is virtually inevitable due to their mutual interest in understanding the ambiguities and mysteries of human behavior, and healing human brokenness.” (Entwistle, 2010, p. 51). This statement then leads the book into the historical background of theology and science.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Every major school of thought has its authors, its influencers, and its divine chosen, if you will. These men and women influence everything from macro economics and political science to the physical sciences of the known universe. Without the contribution of these grand individuals, academics would be destined to their origins, they would cease to develop and many would not even exist. So it is on the existence of these great minds in which we invest our confidence for an ever-growing world. There is one topic in particular, though, whose existence and development is greatly attributed to these individuals: religion.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theoretical approaches in general help us understand the concepts of religion that both our society has created and societies before ours. Two theoretical approaches to “religion” that would help understand ancient cultures would be Archaeology and History. Archaeologist would look closely at artifacts and past civilizations to understand the way they practice or believed in religion. Where as Historians would examine the language that was spoke, which would then correlate to the stories being told and the texts that came from a specific culture, traditions and decrees. Many may say that the archaeological approach to understanding religion has more evidence since the way these individuals look at religion have tangible objects opposed to the…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Course Syllabus

    • 6057 Words
    • 65 Pages

    Noss, D., & Blake, R. (2008). History of the world’s religions (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:…

    • 6057 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For as long as humans have occupied this planet some form of religion has seem to accompany them. Curiosity of the unknown and explanations for things that seem difficult to explain have seemed to spark these ideas of religion. Emile Durkheim sets to explain how society’s infatuation with religion. The explanation of different forms of symbols, such as sacred and profane. With these explanations from Durkheim and how he sets to describe the idea of religion, it is relatively safe to say religion can come from anything.…

    • 1657 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Buddism Paper

    • 1431 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Noss, David and Blake A. Grangarrd. History of the World’s Religions. New Jersey: Pearson Education, INC., 2012.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * This is supported by Emile Durkheim (1915) as he defines religion as the contribution it makes to social integration, rather than any specific belief in God or the supernatural.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foundations of Mythology

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Leonard, S., & McClure, M. (2004). Myth & knowing: An introduction to world mythology. New…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Paper

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Molly, M. (1942). Experiencing the world 's religion. (5th ed., pp. 124-234). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    World Religious Traditions

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (Paul Tillich) This is a powerful statement since it states that religion is the main ingredient of a culture, however the culture is the one that forms the religion to fit its needs or the beliefs of the people. Religions have many traditions that were written in their books or they have been passed along from generation to generation. There are many symbols that describe many religions, example of those symbols are how a Christian person creates the cross by pointing with their right hand first in their forehead down to the chest than to the left shoulder and then to the right shoulder. This as simple of a symbol you will find very few Christians that do not create this cross with their right arm before saying “Amen”. Same with the symbol of a circle which in some religions such as the Buddhism is symbol of eternal life and there is no end to life just constant change and that things will happen over and over as we learn from them so time is not an issue so their focus is on the moment unlike like Christians that believe as the world in a straight line and it has an end so their focus is on the constant future. All religion has objects, animals, gods that they worship and also places of worship like the church for many Christians. In these places of worships as the groups of people gather they share prayers, rituals such baptism, first communion, confirmation, and…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Talal, A. (1982). The Construction of Religion as a Anthropological Category. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber all offer a wide array of thoughts and ideas regarding to religion. Firstly, Emile Durkheim's views of religion will be explained. Durkheim chose to adopt the idea that if religion gave birth to everything essential in society it is because society is the soul of religion (Cosman, 1973, p. 191). Thus, Durkheim chose to view religion as a function which can strengthen social bonds whilst also integrating individuals into society. Durkheim also believed that religion is divided up into two separate sections – the sacred and the profane. The sacred consisted of rites, behavior or objects of reverence that religious belief deemed special, whilst the profane was deemed as everything and anything else in the world which did not have any religious meaning or function (Giddens 1972, p.243). Both of these categories depend on each other for survival; the sacred cannot survive without the profane to support it and vice versa. Karl Marx chose to adopt a…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays