Preview

Two Party System Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1120 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Two Party System Pros And Cons
We have all either heard or used the idiom, two is company, three’s a crowd and this saying can very well be implied to both the two party system of America as well as the third parties in America. Known to our great nation is the two party systems, the Democratic and Republicans. This two party system came about due to a two sided constitution which consisted of an opposing or supporting group or to be clearly defined, the majority squad and minority squad. There was definitely no in between going on here, these were only two parties that one could be a part of. This two party system dominates the United States government and although there is many ways this system is beneficial for promoting public good; it has also been criticized for its disadvantages which include lack of dissenting opinions, apathy of voters due to lack of alternatives and their tendency to ignore different and radical voices. “Today many Americans take pride in their status as “independent voters”, partly because they see parties as lacking vision for the country”. “Since many Americans have become disenchanted by partisan politics, they avoid identification as a “loyal democrat” or a “staunch Republican”. “These negative attitudes towards parties are rooted in the roles that they play in American politics”(ushistory.org 2015).
Third parties serve as
…show more content…
Splinter groups form because of internal disagreements on a particular issue such as ideology differences, certain beliefs, moral ethics, values and or principles. The Tea Party, still a part of the Republican Party because candidates do not run for election as “Tea Party candidates” per say are regarded as a splinter party due to ongoing conflicts of illegal immigration, the right to bear arms, the end of deficit spending and less government control with the Republican

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two party system sometimes affects voting turnout. A state is usually considered a Democratic, Republic, or swing State. Some people think that their vote doesn’t matter because if their states is Democratic (or Republic) then the Democratic (or Republican) candidate will receive their state’s electoral votes. This results to only 45% of eligible voters actually voting.…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has only two major political parties: the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties have a duopoly, meaning that they share almost all the political power in the country. In the United States, a candidate wins the election by gaining a plurality, or more votes than any other candidate. This is a winner-take-all system because there is no reward for the party or candidate that finishes second. Parties aim to be as large as possible, smoothing over differences among candidates and voters. There is no incentive to form a party that consistently gets votes but cannot win an election. As a result, two political parties usually dominate plurality electoral systems to the disadvantage of smaller third parties, just as the Democrats and the Republicans dominate the American political system. No one person or organization prevents third parties from forming, but the plurality system itself usually hinders their efforts to win votes. The United States also has mostly single-member districts, meaning that each legislative district sends only one member to the legislature. There is no benefit to finishing second. Some countries use multiple-member districts, which makes it easier for minor parties to succeed because there are more members winning seats in the legislature. Also the way the US electoral college system is set up discourages third-party candidates. The Electoral College exacerbates the winner-take-all system…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another reason why we have a two system party is most public officials in the United States are chosen in a single-member district. This means whoever wins the majority vote is the only party represented in that district. This makes it hard for third parties to get their hat in the race because they have to fight with these two strong parties and they don’t have a chance to get their name out enough. The Democrats and Republicans are very different, you could say that they are as different as left and right. Without a third party they have a 50/50 chance of winning. When they win they can make laws that their party wants them to make. These two parties don’t want any interference from a third party because when the election is close third party could mess everything up.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    INTRODUCTION We live in an era of unprecedented frequency of change in partisan control of government. Since at least 1994, neither of the United States’ two main political parties can be said to have had a lock on control of the House, the Senate, or the presidency. Incredibly, the seven elections from 1998 to 2010 produced six different combinations of party control: a Democratic president with a Republican Congress (1998), a Republican president with a divided Congress (2000), a Republican president with a Republican Congress (2002, 2004), a Republican president with a Democratic Congress (2006), a Democratic president with a Democratic Congress (2008), and a Democratic president with a divided Congress (2010). Earned Income 60 50…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    American populace was partitioned to two groups. One group comprises of the federalists who were living in the north. Their advantage was in favor of the merchants, ship-owners, and the industrialist. They are currently known as the Democrat party. The North was experiencing a modern upset and Democratic Party was supportive of this change. The Second group comprises of the anti-federalists, who were living in the south and were in light of a legitimate concern for state and farmers right. They are presently known as the republican. History of the Americans demonstrates that the two political vested parties had/have their own particular thoughts. Those thoughts were planted to the most youthful era by the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    huge effect on the separation of Political support as they tried to involve states rights. All…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A political party is an organization that seeks political power by presenting and electing its candidates to office so their philosophy and positions become public policy. During and between elections, a political party plays a fundamental roles in strengthening democratic regimes.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Party platforms are the foundation upon which political parties base their campaigns for the purposes of winning a political contest. It true that to a greater extent, not all aspects of the platform are used in campaigns given that some may be controversial hence working against the candidates or the party itself (Daniel D and James W, 2016). In concurrence with the opinion that it is only the party liberals who articulate the party platforms given that they are the drafters and by large they have taken a position to stand with their respective parties, this paper seeks to raise no objection to that. Many have argued that political parties only serve as vehicles to positions of leadership and for that reason politician or rather those seeking…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson had conflicting ideas on almost every issue, from how to interpret the Constitution, to who should lead the United States. As Hamilton and Jefferson gathered supporters, they both established parties. Hamilton created the Federalist Party ( the modern day equivalent to the Democratic Party). Federalists liked big national government; as opposed to Jefferson's Republican Party, which liked small national government to give more power to states. In the past, Republicans and Democrats have worked together and compromised on issues involving the country. However, recently, compromise is not being reached between the two parties.This has naturally created a divide in our country, which has only been amplified in recent presidential elections. In the words of former U.S ambassador Antonio Garza, "We've allowed ourselves to slide into the politics of anger and fear, of a group of name-calling, where the others – be they immigrants, bankers or supporters of the other candidate – are stupid, crazy, or corrupt. We've forgotten that these nameless individuals are often our neighbors, doctors, teachers, friends and family members" (Garza, 2). As illustrated by the quote, the supporters of both parties and the parties themselves are not working together. Instead, Republicans are too focused on stopping the Democratic party, and Democrats are too focused on stopping the Republican…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because of this, parties naturally form. In the United States, the formation can be traced to before The Constitution and the dispute over strong versus weak government, and continued to develop through the early years of the new government. Once the Constitution was established debates arose on several fronts. Whether it was through financial planning, distribution of power, or potentially unlawful treaties, tensions between the ideals of the two groups were enflamed. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were often so polarized that coming to compromises could be difficult, much to the chagrin of others, including Washington. However, they cannot be completely credited with forming the two-party system. Other politicians contributed, and at times the division was just the natural product of the circumstance. Also, they are not entirely the reason the system has persevered over time. Instead, the nature of elections in the United States have caused the two-party system to be maintained. All this being said, whether Hamilton and Jefferson are entirely to blame, they also proved that dissension is not always bad. It allows for different ideas to be heard and compromises to be made. Through their disagreements they produced innovation that has shaped the nation. This party system, though it has shifted and swapped over the years, still stands. The effects of these men run so deep that…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that the extremes of the two-party system are becoming more moderate, so they are learning to work with each other and compromise. Noonan, a third-party supporter, says the opposite, that the two parties are so polarized as well as the citizens of the United States. Lizza would add that third-parties bring unvoiced issues to the table that is necessary to balance opinion. If Brooks is right, the other two opinions seem less convincing, but they are not insignificant. Personally, I would agree with Noonan that society and government is becoming extremely polarized. However, I don’t think a third-party is the remedy for the stark differences in opinion. Third parties, as Lizza said, do bring some controversial topics to the table, but, again, I don’t think this is enough to reform the strong partisanship in America. Brooks’s thought that the centrist ideology is calming the storm is the only hope we can…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patterson (2016) presents the idea that when a third party system arises in the United States it is short lived, mainly due to the election method that is used in America known as the plurality system, also known as “The winner takes all” (p. 226). Additionally, most third parties exhaust their funding before getting their name on the ballot. Furthermore, it has been proposed that one or both of the major parties will absorb the issues proposed by the third party causing its popularity to diminish. In this manner the existence of the third party gradually…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike many countries in Europe that have multiparty elections and parliaments, the United States government uses two-party system, and the form of the two-party was established since Civil War—Republicans and Democrats. The political conflicts between those two parties in the United States have existed for decades. However, in recent years, there appears a sign of escalation of the situation. The essential purpose of building two-party political system is to guarantee the fairness in making national decisions, avoid single-party corruption and excessive powers, and ensure the democracy. However, seen from the undying fights during the government official election period and the apparent gradually polarized judicial institution, the fairness…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political parties are destroying America in my opinion. They shape an alliance to vote an assured way whether the designated official thinks through the bill as correct or incorrect. The need for authority has lead this nation to basically a two party system. Independents and other groups get nominated on odd circumstances, but time and again it takes the backing and money to make it happen. It turns out to be even worse as the public divided these parties, such that liberal Republicans and conservative Democrats. Unquestionably this Presidential election is more or less electing who you oppose less.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may think that a two party system is not fair, but if there were more than two major parties, people would start to get confused about who said what and to whom. And, as we all know, when people have a decision with too many options to choose from, they simply decide to not choose at all resulting in not voting also known as decreased voter turnout, which would not help America's political system. Decreased voter turnout means that not everyone chose to vote even though they could and a higher number of people voted the year before.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays