Preview

The Two Party System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Two Party System
Government and Politics What are the advantages and disadvantages of the two-party system in the UK? The two- party system is not a new practice in British politics.

Britain has been living under a two party system since the mid-seventeenth Century. However, this system is still a foundation of most ideas of British politics. Other than America, Britain is one of the only major countries that have a two party system.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of this system? Is Britain afraid to change its system? If this system has been around for so long, it is because it has many advantages.

First of all, the system advantages big parties with more seats. When a party wins an election, whether he has won by a majority or not, he gets a majority of seats.

For example, when Labour won in 1997, they got 60% of the seats, although they had not won the election by a majority.

This advantages the party because more seats mean more power and they can then impose their ideas on other parties and always be sure to pass legislation.

This leads to our second advantage; a stronger executive. With this majority of seats, the party can, as we said before, pass on their laws easily, but also resist ministers. This advantages the voter as he is sure that the party he voted for will be "making the law".

For example, if Mr. Smith voted for Labour in the 1997 elections, then he is obviously in favour of their ideas and laws. So, when they make new decisions when they are in power, Mr. Smith is likely to be in favour of them, and so has a better chance of having the legislation passed. The voter is therefore privileged.

Another advantage is that the voter has a clear choice. Because there is only one party elected, the elector can follow what the party is doing, i.e. whether it is keeping its promises or not. If the party does not do what it promised it would, then the voter can then hold it responsible at the next election. And because there is no coalition in British

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Additional Member System gives voters more choice and better representation than does First Past the Post. Discuss.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Whereas FPTP delivers a disproportionate result, allowing two main parties to concentrate support in certain areas, then win constituencies and seats. Smaller parties with less concentrated support will lose easily and unfairly. Example given, in 2005 Labor received 36% of the vote but gain 55% of the seats. The Liberal Democrats won 22% of the vote but could only attain 10% of the seats. This shows AMS is more responsible to the will of the electorate as the composition of parliament will more closely represent the wishes of the electorate.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have all either heard or used the idiom, two is company, three’s a crowd and this saying can very well be implied to both the two party system of America as well as the third parties in America. Known to our great nation is the two party systems, the Democratic and Republicans. This two party system came about due to a two sided constitution which consisted of an opposing or supporting group or to be clearly defined, the majority squad and minority squad. There was definitely no in between going on here, these were only two parties that one could be a part of. This two party system dominates the United States government and although there is many ways this system is beneficial for promoting public good; it has also been criticized for its disadvantages which include lack of dissenting opinions, apathy of voters due to lack of alternatives and their tendency to ignore different and radical voices. “Today many Americans take pride in their status as “independent voters”, partly because they see parties as lacking vision for the country”. “Since many Americans have become disenchanted by partisan politics, they avoid identification as a “loyal democrat” or a “staunch Republican”. “These negative attitudes towards parties are rooted in the roles that they play in American politics”(ushistory.org 2015).…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are some who believe that political parties are beneficial to America’s government. Parties train and nominate political leaders. Political parties unify people with similar views into factions. They advance citizens’ interests and help them understand politics (Political). Having only two parties simplifies voters’ choices. Political parties help make sense of American parties (Krasner), represent people’s views, and define specific concerns.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current system under the Westminster elections is first-past-the-post. This is a majoritarial system in that winner-takes-all. Those who are in favour of PR argue that the FPTP system is under-representative towards minor parties and votes are then typically ‘wasted’. However those who are in favour of the FPTP system point out that it leads to a strong government, a clear outcome and keeps extremist at bay. Proportional representation is a institution of different electoral systems that produces a government based on the votes of the electorate and is proportion to the seats that the party receives. This system is different to the current Westminster formula in that the percentage of votes gained is the same as the percentage of seats received.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A two-party system is a political system in which the electorate gives its majority of votes to only two major parties and in which one or the other party can win a majority in the legislature. An example of a two-party system is the United States of America, which has the Republicans and the Democrats. For the candidacy to be president, the person must have a majority of the party supporting him or her. An advantage to having a two-party system is that it provides stability in the government so that not only one party wins the vote to govern the nation all the time. Two-party systems controls campaigning against each other so that one party can gain support of a certain group or minority. Between the two parties of a two-party system there is some agreement. With having a government with a two-party system with two major parties of similar views and of equal strength fighting for control of a government, when the governmental control alternates between the two parties, the policies that shift wont be so radical that the citizens will oppose and revolt against the government.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A two-party system is a form of party system where two major political parties dominate voting in nearly all elections. As a result, all, or nearly all, elected offices end up being held by candidates chosen by one of the two major parties. Under a two-party system, one of the two parties typically holds a majority in the legislature and is usually referred to as the majority party while the other is the minority party. The United States of America is considered a two-party system. The chances for third party candidates winning election to any office are remote, although it's possible for groups within the larger parties, or in opposition to one or both of them, to have an influence on the two major parties. Having a smaller party candidate can influence the opinions on voters as well as electors because it allows for a change of mind with the various opinions and propositions candidates may bring about in their running for office. According to Martin P. Wattenburg, The Boston Globe, September 21, 2003, “ With a number of viable parties to choose from rather than only two, people tend to feel that their party truly embodies their specific interest, and hence they are more likely to vote.” Because of this people will vote because each individual has his or her own opinion on the way America should be governed. When having to choose from two parties the ideas that someone may have may not exactly be pin pointed and the individual will less likely be obliged to vote because he or she feels their point has not been brought into action. Having variable parties more people can their views brought about. However in a final decision for each party must be reached and will eventually lead to the choosing of two particular parties of what we have today.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, the House of Commons has defeated government control on various occasions, one example being on the 29 April 2009, in which a Liberal Democrat motion that all Ghurkhas be offered an equal right of residence was passed, in opposition to Labour policy. This shows a degree of efficiency within the non-executive areas of the Commons, particularly over controversial and publicised issues. Also, the recent coalition government, with a relatively small majority of 77 seats, has found it more difficult to logistically dominate votes and is therefore forced to provide sufficient scrutiny and amendment. These examples of the Common’s independence from…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The FPTP system firstly creates a strong government as it greatly reduces the risk of coalition governments. Single party governments are strong as they have a majority of seats within the House of Commons which means it is easy for the party to pass legislation and make decisions. As the winning party in an election only needs a plurality of votes to win constituencies and so gain a majority in the House of Commons, it is easy for a single party to gain substantial political power. Coalition governments are however, weak and ineffective as there are two parties conflicting desires to be weighed up, this means that the passing of legislation can take a long time and mean that some parties may not get what they had wished to carry out in their manifesto, which will lose them popularity with the public. In FPTP there have only been two coalitions in the last 70 years, which shows its ability to create majority party governments, this means that generally the party with the best policies (in the voter’s eyes) will be able to pass these…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Majority Government : When one party wins at least half the seats, plus one, in the House of…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, another reason why FPTP should continue to be used for elections in the House of Commons is because it usually produces a strong, single party majority government. This is seen as advantageous because legislation can be passed easily as governments that have been elected will have legitimacy and authority in implementing policies and legislation. Due to the winner’s bonus, the FPTP’s single plurality system usually produces a single party majority government who therefore do not need much support from other parties in order to pass its proposed legislation. For example, the labour party governed with a majority of 413 out of 659 seats in…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ps/102 Final Exam

    • 4512 Words
    • 19 Pages

    interest groups keep a few issues at the forefront of policy, preventing interference by other interests.…

    • 4512 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American populace was partitioned to two groups. One group comprises of the federalists who were living in the north. Their advantage was in favor of the merchants, ship-owners, and the industrialist. They are currently known as the Democrat party. The North was experiencing a modern upset and Democratic Party was supportive of this change. The Second group comprises of the anti-federalists, who were living in the south and were in light of a legitimate concern for state and farmers right. They are presently known as the republican. History of the Americans demonstrates that the two political vested parties had/have their own particular thoughts. Those thoughts were planted to the most youthful era by the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yet, the reformed House of Lords means that technically no party has a majority because during the days of hereditary peers the conservative party was hugely popular amongst the lords, however now there is no majority, with…

    • 709 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PESTLE Analysis of UK

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages

    The UK has a strong democratic system, but differences between coalition partners in the incumbent…

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays