Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Congressional Term Limits

Best Essays
2378 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Congressional Term Limits
Twenty-Eighth Amendment: Congressional Term Limits

Emily Pears
PLAP 1010
April 29, 2012 Fernando Mercado

Democracy is deified as a government ruled by its people, a society represented by its own members forming a self deciding and self governed community. This very essential ideal established the founders of the United States has become harder to uphold, and there are restraints that do not allow for true democracy to be fully expressed. Extra-governmental actions by special interests and the intricate costs of campaigns has married the economic and political arenas and it has resulted the creation of heavily influenced representatives that no longer serve their original function- to represent the interest of their constituents. The functionality of today’s political system would be unrecognizable to that of the original Constitution and that of the founders. The absence of term limits of House and Senate representatives have causes two elements that infringes on the democratic value of the government of the United States; now members of the congress and senate are career politicians and hold office for many ulterior reasons other than the honor of public service, and secondly this notion has now created a political class an exclusive society that dictates the legislative process. An Amendment to the Constitution is necessary to overturn the previous institutional establishment of limitless terms for senators and house representatives, because amendments are the only way to modify the articles of the constitution. [1]
The Proposed Amendment would be as followed:
SECTION 1. No person who has served three terms as a Representative shall be eligible for election to the House of Representatives. For purposes of this section, the election of a person to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives shall be included as one term in determining the number of terms that such person has served as a Representative if the person fills the vacancy for more than one year. (DeMint 2011) SECTION 2. No person who has served two terms as a Senator shall be eligible for election or appointment to the Senate. For purposes of this section, the election or appointment of a person to fill a vacancy in the Senate shall be included as one term in determining the number of terms that such person has served as a Senator if the person fills the vacancy for more than three years. (DeMint 2011)
This turn in political culture has inspired the creation of the Twenty-eight Amendment to the Constitution, which is necessary to reinstitute traditional and effective democracy that is the principle foundation of this nation. Further, we will discuss the proposed amendment’s ratification process, the necessity of a term limit amendment rather than simple campaign finance reform, and finally the aggregate of political benefits that the American people would receive if this proposed amendment is successful.
Due to the fact that this proposal deals with changing how the government functions it must be dealt with a constitutional amendment and not just a bill, this proposal would shift the way government operates for the benefit of democracy and the American people. For an amendment to be ratified it must pass through a rigorous proposition process. The first process entails, a two-thirds approval vote from both the House or the senate and the ratification of the proposal requires a three-fourths vote. The second is based on the two-thirds approval of the state legislators that lead to a congressional convention. The former procedure is how 26 of 27 amendments in the constitution have been ratified barring the 21st amendment that ended prohibition and this is the more likely of the two. The idea for term limits has been on the floor of the house and senate twice in the last two decades arising from similar situations. Both of these movements arose after a crucial and majority democrat to republican shift in congress during mid-term elections. The first was in the 1994 election during the Clinton administration where 54 new congressmen and 9 new senators were elected for the GOP. In 2010 the republicans managed to overturn a record 63 new house seats and 6 senate seats in these two instances freshmen congressmen and senators pledge to self-implement term limits to avoid making the same mistake their long serving incumbent opponents and over staying their welcome. In both of these instances it took a massive upheaval of voters to take down a highly ineffective congress, and though the legislative branch is institutionally supposed to be complicated it should not be beacon of public disapproval in the last 5 years has been below 20%. The way modern congress operates those who seek constant re-election and become career politicians stay in power longer thus the spirit of re-enacting the term limit movement is gone and the means of searching a proposal for this issue becomes a lost cause. South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint is the most recent advocate however his attempt was also futile luckily there is an alternative vehicle for change. [1,2,4]
The latter more alternative method of proposing an amendment is though having a consensus of a two-thirds of the State legislatures approval to call on a Constitutional Convention is of a more special interest when it come to term limits as state legislators demonstrate uphold there own term limits unlike the legislators in Washington. As it is necessary for 34 of the state legislators it is important to point out that 15 states have term limits for their legislators, as well as 8 of the 10 largest cities in America have term limits for their mayors, and 37 states have some sort of term limits for their respective governors. Term limits are supported at a state level but are not supported at a national congressional level because there is more financial incentive to stay in Washington, because of this and an desire to keep the electoral pool fresh and productive states filed suit to establish there own term limits in the 1995 Supreme Court Case US Term Limits v. Thornton where the Arkansas Legislator passed its 73 amendment that created term limits for its state House and Senate members as its representatives in the US congress, former congressman Ray Thornton argued that it was unconstitutional, and in a 5-4 vote the court sided with him. The Court established that states could not change the US Constitution by proposing term limits for their representatives, and that the only means for such change must have to be a constitutional amendment. The issue here is not the popularity of this proposition as the majority of American favor term limits, it is the difficulty of the state legislators to unite as well as the logistical precedent created by US Term Limits V. Thornton case in conjunction with a disconnect with congress and the self serving nature of today’s representatives. [2,3,4] The issues at hand regarding term limits relate to mainly the detachment from average Americans and exponentially lucrative position as members of congress and as political theory has proven that with unregulated power comes corruption and inefficiency. The necessity comes from the new phenomena that are exclusive to the United States Congress, which are the idea of career politicians and no longer citizen representatives. This new political-class is very privileged financially as the average congressmen is worth approximately 5.9 million dollars and the average senator is approx. 13.2 million, while the average 60 year old American (the average age of both congressmen and senators) is about 150,000 dollars clearly there is a gap between the representatives and their constituents. The truth lies in that the marriage between special interests and big business and Capitol Hill provides congressional representatives with many lucrative opportunities given that they use their power to ensure the interest of those funding them. The intersections between the two is explicit that many representatives leave their congressional jobs for one in the private sector working with the private interests they supported, sometimes even before their term is done. Campaign finance reform is not the means to this end, because incumbents do not support bills that would impede their reelection. The answer is not to limit the benefits of incumbents because the price of tenure is too precious to consider risking, that is why political immortality must be taken out of the equation all together. [1,3,4]
In today’s political arena there are very few ways to limit the monetary advantage that any incumbent will receive the main focal point in today’s campaign reform bills are on the amount congressional candidates can spend, but these spending caps also apply to the challenger despite the head start the incumbents receive anyway. In 1976 in Buckley v. Valeo the SPCOTUS declared spending caps unconstitutional and that unlimited political contributions and spending are protected by the first amendment, now spending limits are deemed voluntary. These voluntary limits are easily broken and the penalties are some sort of a punitive taxation of campaign funds, ironically most of the challengers feel the burden of the campaign spending limits as they must raise more money to level the playing field with the incumbent candidate. The amount of money spent in congressional campaigns are also increasingly becoming more expensive because both candidates know the value of the prize, the congressional seat is a gateway to a life on abundant financial growth. In an aggregate of campaign spending candidates spent 678 million dollars in 1992 twenty years later that number has risen to approximately 3.7 billion dollars. The system has mutated into an industry for profit and the American people are the ones who suffer as their representatives have become less involved with their constituents. Incumbents now result to “earmarks” on legislation to provide some sort of service for the constituents, and longer serving officers use more “earmarks” which is a factor in the out of control spending in Washington. Congressmen resort to these quick-fix solutions to gain traction before an election; these tactics hurt the nation and prolong this defected process. This is to be expected, however; one can hardly expect a legislature to pass a law that targets its own privileges for destruction. Real reform measures almost certainly will have to emerge from outside the Beltway and real change will emerge when more state follow the example of the 15 states legislators who already respect term limits. Aside from the benefits of breaking the financial cohesion of congress and special interest groups, term limits will provide better and more democratic lawmakers. [3,5,6]
In regards to policy, first of all, Term limits down plays seniority and favors a meritocracy because unlimited tenure calls for a seniority system it allows long serving representatives the right to serve important committees and chairmanships increasing their legislative power and recognition. Some of these legislators can hold the office so long that they have to large of an advantage to any challenger and without the threat of removal become more self-serving. Secondly, term limits will ensue a culture of meritocracy and will reward short serving representative that have demonstrated initiative and proved to be adequate lawmakers. Thirdly, term limits will increase competition the lack of a seniority system will also increase incentive for talented citizens to run for office as they will be able to take on important issues as they no longer have to “wait it out” in hope of being place in an important committee. If every one is on a level playing field merit will again be the deciding factor, this will increase the effectiveness of congress and also gather better re-reelection will be more competitive and with competition comes better products.
There are congressmen that have reached past four decades representing their district, and are into their late 70’s that have established themselves financially and keep representing their district in the same monotonous manner for many years, and this stagnates the entire constitutional process and makes public service about something other than serving the people. Bill Young (R-FL) has been in office for 41 years and counting and at 81 years old has been the embodiment of a broken system, a man who is only worthy of the seat because of financial leverage and senior advantage this does not reflect the vision of the founders. In Federalist Papers 52 and Federalist Papers 62 the appropriate electoral process of senators and representatives are discussed at length and term limits are excluded, but the vision of a term limit system is not as the founders sought to create a nation’s of citizen representatives and not career politicians, they envisioned a collective group of talented and diverse individualism who would seek a seat due to the passion for service and not because the extra-governmental benefits. [2,7]
Politics in the United States seemed to be broken in the 1910’s till presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson enacted progressive reforms that change the political culture. These changes allowed for a more democratic process that challenged the original foundation but still lived up the most important principles which is to achieve a more perfect, and more democratic union. Term limits will bring back the emphasis on policy and take away form the monetary convolution and partisan polarization in congress as representatives will be more geared on being more effective since they are no longer politically immortal. America is known making sharp decisions when our country requires and the ratification of the proposed 28th Amendment is a strong turn in the right direction.

Works Cited

1. Coleman, Goldstien. 1.Understanding American Politics and Government. Brief. 2010. 2. . "2010 Mid-Term Election." Congressional Report. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr 2012. <www.congress.gov>. 3. "Term Limits For Congress." 1998. N.p., Web. 30 Apr. 2012. 4. "Jim DeMints Views on Term Limits." Charlston Charleston Tea Party. n. page. Print. <http://charlestonteaparty.org/senator-jim-demint’s-views-on-term-limits/>. 5. "New Republicans catch term-limit fever." POLITICO 6. "Congress Age Distribution and Net Worth." Wall Street Journal. n. page. Print. <http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-CONGRESS_AGES_1009.html>. 7. Hamilton, Madison, Jay, . "Federalist Papers 52, 62." .Web. 30 Apr 2012.

Cited: 1. Coleman, Goldstien. 1.Understanding American Politics and Government. Brief. 2010. 2. . "2010 Mid-Term Election." Congressional Report. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr 2012. &lt;www.congress.gov&gt;. 3. "Term Limits For Congress." 1998. N.p., Web. 30 Apr. 2012.  4. "Jim DeMints Views on Term Limits." Charlston Charleston Tea Party. n. page. Print. &lt;http://charlestonteaparty.org/senator-jim-demint’s-views-on-term-limits/&gt;. 5. "New Republicans catch term-limit fever." POLITICO 6. "Congress Age Distribution and Net Worth." Wall Street Journal. n. page. Print. &lt;http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-CONGRESS_AGES_1009.html&gt;. 7. Hamilton, Madison, Jay, . "Federalist Papers 52, 62." .Web. 30 Apr 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A Perfect Constitution

    • 2452 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Professor Larry Sabato is the founder of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia presents 23 proposals to revitalize our Constitution and Make America a Fairer Country. His book provides insight for a hard fought debate. Whether you like his suggestions or not or you agree with him or not, you have to respect anyone that can outwardly state that the United States Constitution as it has been handed down is “outdated.” This quest for reform I’m sure would anger many political conservatives who believe that the Constitution that we know today, is not in need of any reform, and is just the true document that is has always been and should remain.…

    • 2452 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Constitution

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On March 4th 1789 the constitution of the United States of America came into effect. Derived from the visions of seven political leaders and statesmen and consisting of only seven articles, the US constitution would become the first of its kind, the bedrock of democracy and lay the foundations for democratic political systems across the world. Since 1789, America has progressed in ways that would have seemed unimaginable at the time. Politicians and their political ideas have been and gone, World wars have been fought, equality is no longer a wishful dream but stringently expected and the American flag was even planted on the moon. However, one aspect of America has stayed the same. Its democratic values. Made possible by the actions of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. The US constitution has been described as a ‘living document’, designed to adapt through the ages and find solutions to the problems of modern day American politics. The transformation of the US constitution has been a vast but necessary, America has progressed, as have its people. The need for change was to be inevitable, America was after all the leader of the modern world, and its constitution would need to reflect this. To say the constitution ‘has transformed beyond recognition from the vision of the Founding Fathers’ is correct, however, it was meant to.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I believe the United States should reform its governing institutional structures because democracy does not take a great part of it as much as it implies. Through my understanding of the regulation of life in the United States, I have come to realize that it is more of a republican than it is a democratic structure. James Madison, known as “the father of the constitution”, designed the institutional structure to be separated within a form of distribution of powers. Even though Madison’s whole idea of disallowing tyranny through this system is understandable, it has created a major dilemma. This allocation of power has caused a slow and time-consuming flow in the process of taking action. The fear of tyranny has caused…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution republic that was envisioned by the Founding Fathers became a place of liberty and opportunity for countless millions of people from all over the world (Our Ageless Constitution, 1987). Their ideas worked whereas others failed because they were based on enduring principles which recognized human imperfection and the need to structure a limited government of laws, dependent upon the consent of a people who, themselves, understood the principles (Our Ageless Constitution, 1987). The principals acknowledged that individual rights are derived from a Creator. The principals were largely based on the enduring principals compatible with “the laws of nature and of nature’s God. The principals also recognized human imperfection and that a tendency to abuse power is ever present in the human heart (Our Ageless Constitution, 1987). These principals also restrained those in power through a written Constitution which carefully divided, balanced, and separated the powers of government and then intricately knitted them back together again through a system of checks and balances. They also left all powers with the people, except those which, by their consent, the people delegated…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    USINFO.STATE.GOV, (n.d.). Basic readings in u.s. democracy. Retrieved Apr. 16, 2006, from The Judiciary Act of 1789 Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/8.htm.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. A number of states have adopted term limits for state legislators. There also is a two term…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    flaws of US democracy

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although Democracy in the United States serves as a model for many other nations, it has many flaws that choke its true potential. Some authors, like Carl Schmitt would argue that from its outset, democracy in America is inherently flawed, while others like Thomas Jefferson believe that simple adjustments should be made for a more efficient democracy. It is important for the flaws and challenges that plague democracy in American democracy to be addressed, as there are many. It is particularly important to address those challenges if they are some of the essential components of a true democracy. Open discussion, for example, is an important part of democracy, yet here in the United States we have fallen short of the standard. Another challenge U.S democracy faces is the fact that the government is not as representative of the people as it should be.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Voting

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the fledgling nation began to revise its government after the Revolutionary War, the protection of democracy was of the utmost importance and became the infrastructure the new nation was built upon. Although democratic government was not a new idea, the population and size of the Confederation posed a problem for the founding fathers (Greenberg & Page, p.1). Unlike ancient Rome, which modeled direct democracy, the founding fathers instead created a representative democracy in which the people would rule through elected officials. This allowed for a democratic nation based on popular sovereignty created through competitive elections and eliminated the threat of a tyrannical government. “The election of representatives… would keep potentially tyrannical kings and aristocratic factions from power while ensuring popular consent” (Greenberg & Page, p.31). To create a truly democratic society, it was essential to ensure a government that followed the will of the people and not one that forced the people to follow it. The Declaration of Independence states, “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (http://usconstitution.net/declar.html). This is achieved through the use of…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Democracy and America

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The United States is the most powerful nation on earth, politically, economically and militarily, but its political system is in many important respects unlike any other in the world. Aristotle called the rule of the many for the benefit of all citizens a “polity” and referred to the rule of many to benefit themselves as a “democracy”. The term democracy is derived from the Greek words demos (the people) and kratia (power or authority) and may be used to refer to any system of government that gives power to the people, either directly, or indirectly through elected representatives. Democracy is hard, perhaps the most complex and difficult of all forms of government. It is filled with tensions and contradictions, and requires that its members labor diligently to make it work. Democracy is not designed for efficiency, but for accountability; a democratic government may not be able to act as quickly as a dictatorship, but once committed to a course of action it can draw upon deep wellsprings of popular support. Democracy, certainly in America, is never a finished product, but is always evolving. The outer forms of government in the United States have altered little in two centuries, but once we look past the surface we discover great changes. Yet, most Americans believe that the basic principles underlying their government derive directly from notions first enunciated by the Framers. The Framers wanted to create a political system that involved placing the people at the center of power. Due to the vest size of the new nation, direct democracy, a system of government in which members of the polity meet to discuss all policy decisions and then agree to abide by majority rule, was unworkable. As more and more settlers came to the New World, many town meetings were replaced by a system of indirect democracy, a system of government that gives citizens the opportunity to vote for representatives who work on their behalf. Many citizens were uncomfortable with the term…

    • 2508 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (2) The party-list representatives shall constitute twenty per centum of the total number of representatives including those under the party list. For three consecutive terms after the ratification of this…

    • 2998 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    elections and democracy

    • 2872 Words
    • 12 Pages

    From the aforegoing, it can be said that the concept of democracy is used to describe a political system designed to widen the participation of ordinary citizens in government, the powers of which are clearly defined and limited. The building pillars of any democratic political systems remain without any doubt, elections which are seen as the most critical and visible means through which all citizens can peacefully choose or remove their leaders,2 In other words, elections are the principal instruments that compel or encourage policy makers to pay attention to the electorate (citizens)3…

    • 2872 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States is a carefully balanced document. It is designed to provide for a national government sufficiently strong and flexible to meet the needs of the republic, yet sufficiently limited and just to protect the guaranteed rights of citizens; it permits a balance between society's need for order and the individual's right to freedom. To assure these ends, the Framers of the Constitution created three independent and coequal branches of government. That this Constitution has provided continuous democratic government through the periodic stresses of more than two centuries illustrates the genius of the American system of government.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1787, America’s democracy has strengthened not only the inhabitants of the country but has influenced other countries to follow in our footsteps and let democracy flourish over them. These nations range from France, Australia, Brazil, and Russia which all have allowed democracy in and have benefited from its presence. With the power that democracy holds, this country should preserve it and continue to better its principals. As these principals are improved, this increases the possibility of a greater liberty and justice. The government must continue to not intervene in the lives of Americans when not called upon, so as to have total liberty.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    30.0 % Analysis of the Relevance of the Bill of Rights and the Amendments to U.S. Democracy…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is a country of democracy, hope, freedom, and opportunity. The Land of the free and the home of the brave is a common expression when speaking about America. However, the country is not without issues. Politics are becoming more and more complex and in the eyes of the American public, it is seen as ineffective and unproductive as Congress seems to make no progress in the betterment of America. In our political system, Congress is supposed to work for the people to improve the lives of the people. Yet, in multiple instances, Congress has proven time and time again how unproductive they can be when dealing with problems that plague our country. This unproductiveness from Congress leads questions such as why what the real issue with American Politics? However, with all things considered, the real issue in American politics could actually be the two political parties and how they operate Congress. The way in which they operate leads to little to no changes that could help benefit the lives of the American people…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays