Preview

Twelve Angry Men presents the pessimistic view that all humans are flawed.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1675 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Twelve Angry Men presents the pessimistic view that all humans are flawed.
Twelve Angry Men presents the pessimistic view that all humans are flawed.
Pessimistic- cynical, distrustful, negative, doubtful, suspicious, unenthusiastic
Flawed- imperfections, weak, faulty, unlawful, inaccurate, fallacious, unfair

Notes
Weaknesses of the Jurors
Foreman goes with the majority vote rather than independently forming his own judgement
Juror 10 stereotypes all immigrants. Offensive remarks eventually lead to the other jurors turning their backs on him and he finally reflects enough to change
Juror 3‘s relationship with his estranged son conflicts with the case and how he is intolerant to young kids (ageism) he also believes that a common way of handling conflict in his family has always been with physical violence. Dependence on violence as a problem-solving strategy.
Juror 7 is more interested in missing the baseball game than the case (selfish)
The witness who wears eyeglasses says she saw the last two cars passing the elevated train implying that she has 20/20 vision.
Juror 9 “woman who testified she saw the killing had these deep marks on the sides of her nose”.
Juror 11 feels ashamed of his German culture and tries to act more American.
Juror 12 keeps to himself and seems distracted and not interested. He plays noughts and crosses and draws sketches of his advertisements. Cannot articulate his reasoning and changes his vote on multiple occasions
Juror 5 lived in slums and could relate to the accused but he chose to vote guilty as he felt attacked by the other jurors
Guilt or innocence is never revealed
Strengths of the jurors
Juror 8 wants urges the others to be patient and to contemplate the details of the case. Points out the weaknesses in the other jurors. Paternal instinct to the accused due to the boy having a troubled upbringing. Changes the jurors vote.
Juror 11 can relate to the boy as he lived the same life in terms of the environment in which he was raised. Reminds others of their responsibilities and that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “11th juror: if you want to vote not guilty, then do it because you’re convinced the man is not guilty not because you’ve had enough. And if you think he’s guilty then vote that way or don’t you have the guts to do what you think is right?”…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Juror #8 displayed this ability throughout the entire movie. He always had a persuasive but yet argumentative approach to the deliberations. His relevant use of his perspective to others is what gave him the ability to sway others to his direction.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a crowded jury room, opinions collide as discussions about the innocence of a young boy are decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror 10. These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 4 undergoes a series of questions regarding his confidence that a young man is guilty of murder. From the beginning to the end of the play, Juror 4 gradually changes his mind about his initial vote, through the constructive discussions lead by Juror 8. Juror 4 moves from a belief that all legal witnesses are faultless to truly experiencing some sort of “reasonable doubt.” He is left with a clearer picture of the case, looking beyond his personal prejudices and biases.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men is a book written by Reginald Rose and takes place late one hot summer afternoon in the jury-room of a New York Court of law. The story revolves around a Jury that is trying to judge a murder trial. The 12 jurors must decide whether the defendant is guilty or not. The power of persuasion does not only influence characters in the book, but also persuades us to rethink, ‘Should something be changed in the judicial system?’…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, there is Juror 4, a stock broker who appears to be a very mentally tough man, who only cares about facts, has no sense of consideration along with the likes of Juror 3, Juror 7 or 12 who absolutely show no interest in either ‘fancy’ or ‘facts’. They basically just pick their vote based on personal emotions or don’t take any responsibilities at all.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    5th Juror: 5th Juror works in a Harlem hospital and has experience in living in slums his whole life.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men Analysis

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the drama Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, there are twelve jurors to discuss and deliberate if the murder in the first degree is guilt or not. Because the verdict must be unanimous, twelve jurors have a critical thinking in their discussion and finally made the vote from eleven jurors vote for guilty to unanimous vote for not guilty. During the development of the voting, Juror Three is hardly to persuade because he has a serious prejudice to the murder. If Juror Three does not admit the murder is not guilty, they cannot settle a lawsuit. Therefore, Juror Three’s prejudice should be the key to get the final verdict.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Flaws

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the years of America, we had many juries during criminal trials to decide if the defendant guilty or not guilty. In the 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men shows the best representation of American jury system and how people change their minds. 12 Angry Men shows that personal feeling get in the way in their votes. The movie is about how 12 jurors decide the fate of young boy that persumed he killed his father, while during the initial vote only Juror 8 raised his hand not guilty. Then throughout the movie and script each of the 11 jurors for various reason change their votes to not guilty. The 12 jurors change their votes from guilty to not guilty through character flaws, positive personality traits, expertise on the evidence, and pattern of behavior.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of ‘Twelve Angry Men’ Rose demonstrates that reason can often overcome prejudice. The Jurors have to make an important decision…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of the jurors’ personal biases, often the causes of relational or ego/identity based conflict, constantly undermine the voting. Throughout the entire film, perhaps the most heated source of conflict arises from the group’s perception of that era’s underprivileged youth; they are stereotyped as, criminals, menaces to society, and rebels who don’t respect authority. Beginning of film, discussing the accused murderer’s background, Juror #10 exclaims, “You can’t believe a word they say, you know that, they’re born liars.” He later goes on another tirade insulting “these people,” calling the less fortunate wild, violent, lying, drunks. In addition, when Juror #11 who grew up in the slums, changes his vote, angry Juror #3, declares it “defend your underprivileged brother week.” In these cases, the jurors launch face-threatening attacks, causing conflicts arising from ego/identity issues. In bigoted Juror #10’s case, he heatedly calls the honesty and asdf of the impoverished into question. Angry Juror #11 questions Juror #3’s reasonability. These insults delay the group from coming to consensus as these two jurors continuously insist on their opinions, but towards the end of the film actually serve to bring the group together.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12 Angry Men 6

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is interesting to note that during the brainstorming session, the perception set by the prosecution had influenced 11 jurors. The 11 jurors interpreted the scenario painted by the prosecutor as reality and hence their deicison. Juror 8 did not get influenced by it and hence had questions that he believed the defense did not do a thorough enough job investigating the case and arguing the case in court. By arguing that that there are other possibilities to the scenarios argued by the…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the film 12 Angry Men, juror number eight, also known as Davis, showed exceptional moral behavior. Juror number eight may have been standing alone in his opinions, but he had no problem with that. He differs from the other jurors’ in many ways, from his physical appearance and background, to his views, to his actions and speech throughout the film.…

    • 617 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reaction 12 Angry Men

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film 12 Angry Men gives an inside look at the inner workings of a jury deliberation as twelve random strangers are called to do their civil duty. In a group of diverse people from different backgrounds, Henry Fonda’s character attempts to convince the rest of his fellow jurors not to easily convict a troubled young man just because it would be the simple solution to all of their problems. The jurors are placed in extreme circumstances in which heat and angst drive them to push for a guilty verdict, despite the clear evidence of reasonable doubt presented through the trials facts. In the end, Henry Fonda’s character gets the other jurors to realize that all of the evidence is circumstantial and they present a not guilty verdict to the judge. This film presents a situation in which it becomes clear that previous prejudices can influence the verdict that certain jurors hand down. It is difficult for people to become unbiased, even in cases that require them to be.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays