Twelve Angry Men Analysis

Good Essays
In the movie twelve angry man, after the twelve jurors listened to the facts in the trail, the judge gives her instructions to them. The judge told them that the man could face the death penalty if he found guilty. The 12 man gather in a stifling hot room to have a concluding about the case. They start arguing and adding their own experience, culture, and understanding of people's motives as a way of reconsidering the facts. Although all the jurors had listened to the same stated facts and they were in the same situation, each one of them interprets the facts differently. This reflects the differences in people and the different ways that we view the same things. The first Juror to votes not guilty in the initial vote is the old white man who works as an architect. As when sitting on his office and drawing blueprints for constructing a building, He was very quiet and respectful in the room. He wasn’t convinced that the boy is innocent, but he wants to compare what’s really happened with the testimony’s evidence. At the end of the film he introduces himself to one of the jurors as Davis. He is free of prejudice, and he believes in justice for all. Although in his job he can be sure about the construction material and similar things, …show more content…
He is a small business owner, which is running messages service. He proudly says that he started his business from scratch and now employs thirty-four workers. He makes his decision based on the fact of his bad relationship with his son. He didn’t speak with him since two years. Although it may not be through the facts of the case, but he is convinced that the defendant is guilty. Actually, he changes his mind once he realizes that he is reflecting his feelings about his own son onto the defendant. At the end of the movie, he loses control of his emotions, and he reveals that his relationship with his own son has biased his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When it comes to one's personal experience the way in which one understands and views the case at hand can become heavily influence because of these said beliefs. In psychology this is commonly known as belief perseverance, this is when people cling to their beliefs, even when faced with contrary evidence. Throughout the film “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, one can clearly see how these personal beliefs and experience cloud the mind and judgement of the jurors because of this it takes a very long time for a clearly innocent man to be seen as innocent due to the personal beliefs of some of the jurors and because of those beliefs they were only able to see the innocent as guilty. However, at the same time one's own personal experience can…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    None the less for the purpose of referencing a brief introduction to the movie and its characters is given here: The plot of 12 Angry Men describes the events that take place as a jury has come to a unanimous decision. The defendant is accused of homicide. If the jury decides upon a verdict of ‘guilty’ the judge will inevitably sentence the accused to death penalty. In the beginning all jurors but juror no. 8 are willing to verdict ‘guilty’ without debating. However juror no. 8 states he will verdict ‘not guilty’. The group is then forced to discuss and reconsider. In the end of the movie juror no. 8 is able to get all other jurors to verdict ‘not guilty’. His main antagonist is juror no. 3.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose in 1957, portrays the intense discussion between 12 jurors in the American jury about a 16 year old boy, who is accused of killing his own father, and charged with “premeditated homicide”, the most serious charge in court. It explores the flaws of human nature, and the impacts of misinterpretations of the case can have on the defendant. However, they play also illustrates when jurors reassess the case and themselves, they will finally follow the judge’s words, which is to “separate the facts from the fancy.” Throughout the play, all jurors reconsiders about the case and themselves, nonetheless not all succeeds. The 4th Juror is the only character which successfully renewed his knowledge about the case and himself. Characters such as the 6th juror develops new understanding of the case but is still a few steps from truly knowing himself. While jurors such as the 10th juror, is forced to alter his vote despite rejecting all of other juror’s arguments.…

    • 880 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: Juror 1

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror #1 originally thought that the boy was guilty. He was convinced that the evidence was concrete enough to convict the boy. He continued to think this until the jury voted the first time and saw that one of the jurors thought that the boy was innocent. Then throughout the movie, all of the jurors were slowly convinced that the boy was no guilty.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 angry men paper

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The movie “12 Angry Men” is about a murder trial set in the mid 1900’s when the American legal system had very different rules from what it has now. The trial is about a 16 year old boy who supposedly murdered his father late one night in New York City. He was from a slum, with a history of problems with the law, including knife fights. The jury is made up of twelve white men who are supposed to deliberate about the boy’s fate when he is Latino. In the beginning of the movie it’s very clear that eleven of the twelve jurors have already decided that he was guilty, the only one who said not guilty is juror number eight. Juror number eight believes that you can’t send someone to die without even talking about the case first. As the movie goes on they discuss the different parts of the case and one by one the jurors begin to change their vote to not guilty. The first thing they discuss is the knife that was used to kill the father, then they discuss the time it took the only man on the floor below to get to the door after he heard the body hit the floor. After that they went on to deliberate more about previous things talked about, until finally they talked about the women who actually viewed the killing through a passing L train. One of the jurors remembers that she had indents on the sides of her nose indicating that she wore glasses, so they come to the conclusion that she couldn’t of seen anything since she wasn’t wearing her glasses while lying in bed. Once they finally call for a last vote they come to the verdict of acquitting the boy. All twelve jurors finally agree on the decision of not guilty.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is because probably once his connected his own experiences, he was intolerant and ignorant to anything or anyone in favor of his side. This is why when Juror Eight was initially disagreeing, he became rapidly short tempered and made seemingly meaningless comments about how the kid just has to be guilty. He had no actual evidence, but because he was biased, he saw that as reason enough. Also, his description describes to having a streak of sadism. Sadism is defined as the tendency to derive pleasure from inflicting pain, suffering, or humiliation on others. This child being convicted guilty would cover all of his sadist bases. The child just being convicted would be humiliating, he would suffer in prison, and he would of course be killed eventually. Why wouldn’t Juror Three want him to be convicted as guilty. It is in his personality to want to make people suffer. Even when there was substantial evidence of his innocence, he still voted guilty. It was in his character to be biased towards this kid. From his background to his central personality, he was prejudice against him from the very…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men: Emotion

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Emotions have significant role in the film 12 Angry Men when the jurors have to come to a decision about whether the boy is guilty or not. The different emotions shown by the jurors hinderstheir perspective and judgements on the case as well as towards the testimonies from the witnesses taken during the trial. Juror #3 was firm and determined that the boy was guilty. He had a powerful hatred towards teens in general after having past experiences with his own son. This makes him look past all the evidence built against the claim that he is guilty. For example, he refused to believe the doubt towards the testimony of the old man. As per the testimony the old man heard the boy yell “I’m gonna kill you” as well as heard a body hit the floor a split second later. After discussing in detail it comes into consideration that there could have been no way for the old man to hear anything as the el train would have been roaring past his window. As described by Juror #8 one is unable to hear their own thoughts with the unbearable noise of the el train. This clearly brings the old man’s testimony into doubt. Juror #3 is still persistent and stubborn to believe the truth that is being set in front of him solely because of his anger and hatred towards teens. In contrast, Juror #2 is new to the juror and hence very happy and excited about the case. When he gets the opportunity to talk about the case, he is very open towards any argument that is being made. He thinks logically of every piece of evidence that was not bought in court and makes his decisions regarding that. Therefore with a very unprejudiced happy mind his ability to think logically and reasonably about the case comes into practice. This is how different jurors come to different conclusions through their emotions in the movie 12 Angry Men.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juror # 8: He is the only member who voted “not guilty” in the first voting. He’s main concern was that the trial was not handled in a proper manner by the defendants lawyer. He wanted to examine the evidence more thoroughly to see whether there was any room for doubt about the case.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men was a great depiction of how one person could influence a large amount of people by looking beyond the obvious. This movie was about a jury attempting to establish a verdict on the behalf of a teenage boy that killed his father. There were twelve men that made up the jury. The trial included two witnesses that did not have solid reasons for accusing the young boy of killing his father. One witness heard the boy threaten his father seconds before he died, and the other witness claimed that she seen the boy kill the father from her window. These two witnesses provided enough information for the court and the jury to already have their decision made.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Juror nicknamed “The messenger service guy” was very loud and obnoxious from the get go. He mentioned in the movie how he was estranged with his own son, which led me to believe the trial hit him on a personal level that blinded his judgment. He is stubborn and set in his ways, he is the hardest to convince that the subject might not be guilty.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The movie 12 Angry Men is about the jury deliberation in a criminal case against an eighteen year old Latino who is accused of stabbing his father to death. It starts after the defense and the prosecution have presented all the evidence and the jury goes to the jury room to decide the guilt or innocence of this man. The whole movie takes place in the jury room. The case was supposed to be an open and shut case with all the evidence proving the Latino was guilty. Eleven jurors found the man guilty but one found him not guilty, which, is the basis of the movie.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men, a boy is convicted of the murder of his father and 12 jurors are chosen to decide his fate. In the beginning, all of the evidence points to him being guilty. However, after a little bit of analysis of the evidence, there is some reasonable doubt. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: Juror 3. The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the directors shot selection in the film and in the text affect the readers interpretation of the final scene where Juror 3 says not guilty greatly.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In analyzing 12 Angry Men the first theory that came to mind is the Universal Theory of Leadership. The theory is defined as the belief that certain personal characteristics and skills contribute to leadership effectiveness in many situations. This shows true with Juror #8. Juror #8 was the architect who emerged as a real effective leader. The architect showed self-confidence and assertiveness. He convinced the jury that once all thought the young man was guilty to believing he was innocent due to the lack of proof and questionable assumptions. He showed himself as respectable, knowledgeable, and authentic. The architect rose question as to whether or not the circumstances could be possible by re-enacting the situation. He challenged the process completely by doing this. He was also a leader of integrity because he was loyal to rational principles, practiced what he preached, and did this regardless of the social pressure from fellow jurors’. With these characteristic traits the architect proves to be an charismatic and effective leader.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His emotional prejudice gets in the way of his critically thinking through the evidence because he has emotional conflict with his own son. He is grouping all teens together because of his altercation with his son, and Juror 3 is just punishing the young man on trial because he cannot come to turns with his own failings as a parent with his child. Towards the end of the play Juror 3 is all alone on the vote count; he “looks around at all of them for a long time. They sit silently, waiting for him to speak, and all of them despise him for his stubbornness. Then, suddenly, his face contorts as if he is about to cry, and he slams his fist down on the table” … (thundering) All right” (30).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men depicts the story about twelve people serving as jury who has different attitudes, personalities, and emotions and approaches the premeditated homicide case. These attributes have affected them to deliberate the case and face a responsibility so a unanimous decision has been achieved. The main idea is to display and determine whether those men have acted as a team and to analyze if they are practicing the group dynamics as they evaluated the evidence, testimony and personal agendas. In the organization behavior perspective, individual personality, mood and emotions are among the barriers and restrictions in making a decision. This is the responsibility of them on how to encounter such differences - either decision, or argument. This movie can relate to philosophers arguments such as David B. Wong’s “Relativism” and Jeremy Bentham “The Principle of Utility”. While eleven jurors voted guilty the one juror has an open mind and believes this boy is too young to die without a trial being discussed. In any case juries should have a discussion based on the trial and not jump to conclusions.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays