Preview

Tuesdays with Morrie

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tuesdays with Morrie
Death and Life - Tuesdays with Morrie
PART 1 Nagel wrote: “everybody dies, but not everybody agrees about what death is.” In this chapter, Death, Nagel explains some of the beliefs people have about death. One of his points was survival after death. Nagel said that if dualism is true we can understand how life after death might be possible. Each person would consist of a soul and a body, and the soul would have to be able to leave the body and function on its own. If dualism is not true, then life after death could not exist because mental processes go in the brain which depend on the rest of the body. Nagel believes that life after death might be tangible if dualism is true. Nagel asserts that death, the most terrifying of things, is nothing to us. Since as long as we exist, death is not with us; but when death comes, then we do not exist. It does not then concern either the living or the dead. He explained that death can be considered a negative evil because when a person dies, their lives end. This means that there is nothing left; no love, work, food, clothing, cars or anything else. When Nagel says death has no value, positive or negative, he means to the person who has died. One's death can clearly have value to others, negative to one's family and friends, positive to one's enemies or those who profit from it. Nagel also explained that anything that is bad for someone-must be bad for that person at a particular time. There is no time at which death is bad for the one who dies. Death is not bad for someone before he dies; it is not bad for her once he dies, because from that point on she no longer exists. Nagel makes a good point when he said: “the fact that all good things in life come to an end is reason for regret.” Some people want more to enjoy in their lives. Others are terrified of death, so they live in fear, not living life to the fullest. He said that it is scary to think that when a person dies, the world with go on without them and they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tuesdays with Morrie

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tuesdays with Morrie, was based on a true story about friendship and lessons learned. It’s about a sports writer, Mitch and former sociology professor, Morrie, who is in his last days of life after being diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and their rekindled relationship after many years. They first met on the campus grounds at Brandeis University. This never forgotten relationship was simply picked back up at a crucial time in both Mitch’s and Morrie’s life. After seeing his professor in an interview on the show “Nightline”, Mitch is reminded of a promise he made sixteen years earlier to keep in touch. Since the airing of that show, Mitch met with Morrie every Tuesday to learn and understand all the wisdom and lessons of life. These discussion topics included: death, fear, aging, marriage, family, forgiveness, a meaningful life, and so on. This story took place in Morrie’s study in West Newton, Massachusetts. Overall, this book was about Morrie’s and Mitch’s final class: The Meaning of Life.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    death does not represent the ultimate end to one’s life. Therefore, to Billy death does not retain…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can remember how when I was young I believed death to be a phenomenon of the body; now I know it to be merely a function of the mind−and that of the minds of the ones who suffer the bereavement. The nihilists say it is the end; the fundamentalists, the beginning; when in reality it is no more than a single tenant or family moving out of a tenement or a town (42).…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Nagel's Argument?

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nagel's argument is that death is bad to cause individual power by his consenting to directed against views from the beginning, and carefully establish the boundaries of his argument. For example, Nagel decides to leave aside the complex debate over whether we are "immortal" in some fashion - and define death as being the absence of any "conscious survival" .Similarly, he is equally careful to restrict the valuation of life to one's subjectivity instead of viewing it in an objective sense. This removes complications that may come from an "objective" viewing of the valuation of life from the perspective of others. Having thus carefully framed the boundaries of his argument, Nagel presents his key contention with regard to the "asymmetry" in…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nagel believes that we are ridiculous creatures in the sense that we can’t prove without a doubt that our projects or goals are valuable. We can’t prove that our pursuits and goals have any value due to the existence of a gap that separates how we perceive a situation and the actual reality of the given situation. By noticing that we are absurd in this sense, we can approach our pursuits and goals with a more spirited attitude in that we think that our pursuits and goals are valuable in order to elude any conflicts with others about whether or not our pursuits have value. Another way to describe this approach would be the reality that everyone has differing values that they hold and the most likely case scenario that we won’t always agree with or support their values. An example of this approach would be an individual who pursues the project of going to Cubs games whenever possible. Say this person meets an individual who dislikes baseball who deems his project has no value due to the Cubs lack of playoff success (prior to this season, of course). That individual wouldn’t take offense or feel wronged by the other’s perception of…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dead do not exist. “ ( page 167 ) Therefore, death is not bad for the dead. Therefore death is bad for neither the living nor the dead.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, if all facts need be to dated, then we are back to square one and still need to determine when death is horrible. In that case, I stand with Kagan in stating that “death is bad for me when I’m dead”2. In my opinion, even when one ceases to exist, death can be awful on the premise that unawareness of what you are being deprived of doesn’t mean that you are not being deprived. Imagine there are two twin brothers, one brother, James, is immensely rich, among the 1% of wealthy people and the other brother, Jack, is James’ personal accountant. Jack steals about $5,000 from his brother every year for the past 10 years knowing James will not notice the missing money nor will he be suspicious. Indeed, James does not notice the subtle fluctuations in his money for the past ten years and is not in any way suspicious of Jack because he trusts Jack dearly. In the end, the James is being deprived of his money, whether or not he has no ample knowledge of it. This is to say that even in death, where we no longer exist, we are still being deprived of the very essence of life and living whether or not we are aware of…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    in Hecht 236) Hecht connects this idea to the idea of happiness because this way of thinking will help you to understanding death in a way that won’t distress you and if you remember that death is something that must happen to everyone, one can create a transformation within oneself and have a happier life. The effects that remembering death has on my idea of happiness is I know that we all must die, we all must enjoy life to the fullest while we are alive, and we must create a better future for our kids, but no one ever expects that their child will die before them. Trying to put your life back together after the loss of a child is unbearable. The pain and the grief is enough to succumb your…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death is inevitable. No matter how much an individual clings to life hoping and wishing to escape death, death always follows. Yet, in the presence of those who cling to life, there are individuals who accept that death is a part of life. Those individuals realize that from the moment of birth death is inevitable. In light of these two polar responses to death I find it important to try to understand the concept of “good death.” For the purpose of this short essay I will not dive into whether death is good. For now I will only explore the fluidity of “good death” by highlighting specific attitudes that have endured over the past 150 years and offer personal suggests for why I think these attitudes have persisted.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Response To Nagel Death

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will address the first, and in my opinion, the strongest objection against Nagel’s argument. The objection is that it can be doubted that anything can be evil unless it causes displeasure to a person. In other words, how can the deprivation of life be evil if there is no one there to mind the deprivation? (Banach 2016) This type of objection can also be expressed in the general form by the remark ‘what you don’t know can’t hurt you’ (Nagel, 2008, p.771). To represent this objection, Nagel presents an example of a man who is betrayed, ridiculed and despised by people who seemingly like him. Yet none of this can be counted as a misfortune to him as long as he does not aware of it. Someone arguing for this objection holds the view that goods and evils must be temporally assignable states of a person. In the case mentioned above, betrayal, deception and ridicule are only bad for the man when he learns of them, but until he does, he does not suffer. Applying this argument to death, one can only suffer the implications of death after one ceases to exist. However, after one ceases to exist, there is no subject that the misfortune can be assigned to, and therefore death does not deprive us of any…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear Of Death Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Death is inevitable; People are all going to die at one point. Kagan in his book asks whether there is life after death. Since death comes after life, it paves for life again or is it eternity. Kagan thinks that death can be, and very often is, bad for the person who dies (and this is so because death deprives that person of the goods of life). However, Kagan denies that death is not bad. It is reasonable or appropriate for people to fear death. Kagan claims that only if people have three conditions. The first is the object of fear is bad. People are fear of death because of the badness of death. Death is defined as a bad thing because if people died, all things will not exist. If a person does afraid of one thing, the thing must be bad. Put…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Life and Death Overtakes

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Death is a dreaded word. It is a word that many people would not want to talk about. Death is considered a morbid word and many would not find this as an engaging topic. According to Patricelli (2007), “[d]eath remains a great mystery, one of the central issues with which religion and philosophy and science have wrestled since the beginning of human history. Even though dying is a natural part of existence, American culture is unique in the extent to which death is viewed as a taboo topic. Rather than having open discussions, we tend to view death as a feared enemy that can and should be defeated by modern medicine and machines”. There are also people that have negative connotations about death, rendering life even meaningless because of it. Death appears to render life meaningless for many people because they feel that there is no point in developing character or increasing knowledge if our progress is ultimately going to be thwarted by death (Augustine, 2000). But the author contends that there is a point in developing character and increasing knowledge before death overtakes us: to provide peace of mind and intellectual satisfaction to our lives and to the lives of those we care about for their own sake because pursuing these goals enriches our lives. From the fact that death is inevitable it does not follow that nothing we do matters now. On the contrary, our lives matter a great deal to us. If they did not, we would not find the idea of our own death so distressing--it wouldn't matter that our lives will come to an end. The fact that we're all eventually going to die has no relevance to whether our activities are worthwhile in the here and now: For an ill patient in a hospital a doctor's efforts to alleviate pain certainly does matter despite the fact that 'in the end' both the doctor and the patient will be dead (Augustine).…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death In Culture

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Death is a necessity to culture and society therefore it is irrational to fear the unenviable and the necessary. Death whether physical or non-physical will always cause change. The change that is caused by death does not always have to be direct but can manifest itself as an indirect change. Throughout time societies have risen and fallen, times changes, nothing is ever going to stay the same. Death is a factor that will impact everyone who is alive as they will meet death. As society’s change and cultures evolve so do the people; to keep change occurring death must ensue for creation to occur. Society’s and cultures depend on death. Death is the drive of progression which drives society’s and cultures to get farther from the unetible death.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How do we know anything?

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Solipsism is the main case and point in Nagel’s chapter on “How do we know anything?” Solipsism can be defined as a radical form of idealism subject to each person. One who follows the ideals of solipsism would deny the physical existence of anything, but the mind itself. The universe as we know it may only exist in a dream-like state of our own mind. Welcome to the matrix, where all your perceptions are only those of a reality simulated in your own mind. We can choose between the red pill, or the blue pill on this argument.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tuesdays with Morrie

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book “Tuesdays With Morrie” we are given a good look into Morrie’s childhood, and how it helped shape him into the man he became. Even though the relationships he had with his family weren’t always stable, he learned something important from each one of them. He learned about death and grief from his mother, how not to love from his father, how to love from his stepmother, and compassion from his little brother. Although things weren’t always easy at home, he still learned the right way to properly raise his own family, with a loving wife, and how to keep their relationships strong right up until the end.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays