There is much cause for speculation as to Nicholas’ suitability as Tsar. Nicholas started his reign with little experience or desire to rule. On the day of his coronation, over 1,000 people were trampled to death in the crowd. He proceeded with the festivities, apparently unconcerned or oblivious to the death of his subjects. He privately admitted to his shortcomings, saying, “I am not prepared to be a tsar. I never wanted to become one. I know nothing of the business of ruling.” Do the people of Russia want a Tsar who acknowledged that he is incapable of fulfilling his duty?
Unlike his father, a man of confidence and strength, Nicholas has always seemed weak willed, often doubting himself. However, he reportedly said his rule was sanctioned by God, and that he regards “Russia as one big estate, with the tsar as its owner.” It seems odd that a man who described himself as, “without will and without character,” would declare himself appointed by God as supreme ruler. …show more content…
Petersburg, demanding improved working conditions. Soldiers killed ninety two innocent civilians, and injured many more, for nothing more than participating in a non violent demonstration. This led to more uprisings in 1905, and rather than try to settle the matter diplomatically, Nicholas sent soldiers to subdue them. This poor management of the situation led to the escalation of the revolutions, and increasing support for the Marxist revolutionary leader Leon Trotsky. Meanwhile, the public opinion of Nicholas II declined even