Truth in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Powerful Essays
Research Paper

TRUTH IN JULIUS CAESAR.

Shakespeare

[pic]

Albert Camus said “Truth, like light, blinds”. This similie, used in The Fall is meant to reveal the ambiguity of this notion. Truth is a concept that obviously defines the quality of being true as opposed to false. It is like rooted in every human being, as an ultimate goal, nearly as powerful as any belief because it requires faith as well. Also, it is well-known that one of the main philosophical representations of truth is a blinding sun. In Julius Caesar, a tragedy written by Shakespeare in 1599, there is something worth saying about the opposition between light and darkness as suggestive of the opposition between truth and lie in the play.

Julius Caesar is based on the story of the famous emperor’s assassination but William Shakespeare heightens the conspiracy which led to his death and threw light on the use of truth to reach one’s goal. As in a bipolar world made of good and evil, light and darkness, there is a duality between truth and lie in the play. How this dualism applies to Shakespeare’s work?

In the first place, it is important to keep in mind that truth is an abstract concept, meant to disqualify lie and liars by approving or not a statement. But truth is also linked to reality in the sense of it is a conformity to a fact in which one should trust, it has to be seen to be believed. Finally, it is important to dicover the “true truth” about fact and fiction, between history and the story.

* * *

To begin with the analysis of truth in Julius Caesar, it is absolutly important to define what the meaning of this term is. Truth is the conformity between what it is said and the reality of things. It is a statement proven to be or accepted as true.[1]
It is obvious that in a story of a murder plot, truth will be used in a misapproporiate way. Julius Caesar, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Conflicting perspectives are the direct result of bias or self-interest as people are always quick to enforce the correctness of their perspective over those of others, by contrasting their perspectives with others, they seek to advantage their own point of view opposed to the viewpoints of others. Conflicting perspectives are caused by bias, or prejudice, and self-interest from a person, event or situation that is encountered. William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Philadelphia (1993), written by Ron Nyswaner and directed by Jonathan Demme, are both prime examples of when bias and self-interest lead to conflicting perspectives in society. More than anything else, conflicting perspectives are the immediate result of bias or self-interest as the emplify the rise of self in society.…

    • 2407 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Cicero states “Men may construe things after their fashion,” (Act I Scene iii, Page 37, Lines 34–35) Often, misperception and misreading can drastically affect the outcome of people in their lives. Misperception and misreading not only affects the characters in Julius Caesar, it also affects everybody’s decisions in their day-to-day lives. In much of Shakespeare’s tragedy, the reader witnesses the idea of misperception and misreading of omens and events as they occur throughout the book. It is by his own misperception that Brutus is manipulated, and it is because of Decius Brutus’s misreading of Calpurnia’s dream that Caesar is killed later that day. Also, it is due to misperceptions the citizens of Rome are so easily swayed by Antony’s speech in the marketplace and Cassius commits suicide. Misperceptions and misreadings both shape and carry the plot throughout the book and are the main theme in it.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” Elements of Literature. Ed. Holt Rinehart. New York: Holt McDougal, 2002.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The killing of Julius Caesar was not so much an act of simple brutality as it was a significant turning point in history. The play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare depicts various members of Roman society conspiring to and eventually killing Julius Caesar; subsequently causing chaos to spread in Rome. During their orations, Brutus and Antony employ various strategies in order to receive the crowd’s support in their respective causes.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Shakespeare demonstrates the idea of everything having an opposing truth in his play Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare’s play reveals that not everything is as it appears through its plot, the character’s language, and the events that take place. He demonstrates this with two literary devices; Duality and double entendre. The dualities in his play consist of love and hate, good and evil, and light and dark.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, many people could argue for and against the killing of Julius Caesar. Personally I believe that his murder was not justified enough to be conducted. My belief is supported by the fact that the conspirators decision was made purely on belief and jealously, and not factual evidence that would support taking Caesar’s life.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that Caesar's death is just something that has being pending among everyone because there must…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to literature, conflicting perspectives are often woven artfully through the fabric of the text. The Shakespearean tragedy ‘Julius Caesar’ and Rob Sitch’s film ‘The Castle’ are two such pieces of literature that examine a range of conflicting perspectives. Humans are innately biased and self-interested, and it is our inability to separate a situation from bias and self-interest that often results in conflicting perspectives. Both composers explore this concept through the use of a variety of poetic, dramatic and cinematic devices.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personalities, events or situations often elicit conflicting perspectives. To what extent has textual form shaped your understanding of conflicting perspectives.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Act I Q A

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Why have Caesar and his attendants gathered in a public square near the Forum?…

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defends the noble Brutus. " Brutus is an honorable man"(300), so if he tells of Caesar being ambitious then you all should believe him. He expresses to everyone the reasons and times, "as he was ambitious"(300). Everything had a reason and truth behind it and for this is why they believed Antony. For, " Antony himself was an honorable…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They want the commoners to break up and move along; they don 't want them…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act 2 of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is when Brutus decides to assassinate Julius Caesar for the benefit of Rome. Through a monologue, Brutus explains why he believes Caesar should be killed. Although Brutus loves Caesar as a friend, he opposes the political system where only one director tyrannically reigns a country. Instead, he believes in a republic form of political system guided by the votes of senators. After Cassius started to convince Brutus into turning against Caesar, Brutus had been in agony, in between his patriotism for Rome and his friendship with Caesar. In this speech explaining his virtues and reasons for assassinating Caesar, he uses various rhetorical modes, such as logos, ethos and pathos.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deception, whether it is used for good or for evil is the method of choice that many figures use to manipulate others in order to get one’s way. Many characters in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, unconsciously make choices based upon deception and logical tricks, setting themselves up in order to be used for another character's relevance. Brutus, a noble friend and an idealistic man, questions his ties with a returning friend and makes a decision anyone would later regret. Decius intentionally re interprets Calpurnia's dream which results in Caesar making his last trip to the capitol while Antony convinces the Common Roman people to turn against the so called “honorable” man.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays