Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Truency

Satisfactory Essays
340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Truency
Have you ever imagined living in a country with tyranny? Let me explain all the bad things that could happen. The president would be elected for you, and your rights would be taken away. The constitution guards against tyranny by federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and balancing power between big and small states.
Federalism is one way the constitution can guard against tyranny. For example the framers gave the central government the job to be in charge with foreign trade. The state government is in charge of education. “Hence a double security to the rights of the people’’ (Doc A). “James Madison was a key framer and he made sure that federalism would protect the rights of the people by making sure the states nor the central government became a tyranny (Doc A).” A second way the framers guarded tyranny was by separation of powers. This meant the three branches of the central government would each hold powers separate from the other two branches. “According to James Madison there can't be a tyranny in democracy because the powers should be separate and distinct (Doc B).” James Madison said it was important to keep these powers separate. When they get into the same hands you will have the perfect meaning of tyranny.
Checks and balances was an excellent idea for attacking tyranny. The framers decided to give each branch a way to control business of the other branches. “The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other (Doc C).” Checks and balances keep any one branch from becoming a tyranny over the others. The president can veto any law he/she wants to. The fourth way the framers guarded tyranny was big states vs. small states. The small states got some power so the big states couldn’t take over. The small states got two senators, just like the big states (Doc D).the House of Representatives was based on population, so that the big states could get more representatives.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One way that the framers protected against Tyranny was through federalism. “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time will be controlled by itself.” (Document A) By separating the two different governments ,it creates a double security to the rights of the people Commentary, and the two control each other and itself. This guards from a tyranny because it keeps the power completely separated between central and state government but keeping the power even at the same time, so that one doesn’t inherit too much. Document A states that powers given to the central government include: regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, declare war, print and coin money, set up post offices, and make immigration laws. Powers given to the states include: set up local governments, hold elections, establish schools, pass marriage and divorce laws, and regulate in-state business. The two different parts government hold their own different powers and responsibilities that are both limited and shared to keep it fair. This guards from tyranny because it splits up the rolls between the central and state government but still keeps them even. Federalism is one of the main ways…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    776, July 4 is when the United States declared independence from England . King George III was acting like a tyranny because he taxed people without representation.Also, he had soldiers stay in the people’s houses it was called the quartering act. Tyranny means accumulation of all powers...in the same hands,whether of on, a few, or many. The Article of Confederation failed because they had no chief executive and could not force states to pay taxes. The Constitution took place in 1787 at Philadelphia. Twelve of the thirteen states were there.The constitution guarded against tyranny by seperation of powers. Seperation of powers means divided goverment power between 3 branches. Doc B is an excerp from federalisat paper #47 wriiten by James Madison.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year of 1787 the rights and liberties of citizens of the United States would be changed for eternity. The Constitution was signed to create a democracy by which the United States was governed to protect against tyranny (cruel or unjust powers). Before the Constitution, under the Articles of Confederation, there was no chief executive or leader, no court system, and there wasn’t even a way for the central government to force a state to pay taxes. So, how did the Constitution guard against tyranny? Federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and big states v. small states are all ways that protect the people of the United States and the Constitution against tyranny.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the Constitution had an essentially negative view of human nature. Those advocating for a strong, centralized “federal” government, were concerned that a pure democracy could be could be taken over by a populous mob. Those advocating for a limited, weak, central government were concerned that too much power concentrated in a federal structure could lead to tyranny. While the framers approached the crafting of the Constitution from a two different perspectives, they held a common belief about their fellow man: that man with too much power may become corrupt, and will abuse that power at the expense of others.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as the Americans first broke away from Britain, they wanted their government to not resemble Britain’s at all. By doing this, they adopted the Articles of Confederation that had no national executive branch. However, because the government under the Articles of Confederation had about no power because it couldn’t raise money through taxes, the people who led the national government came to realize that a more centralized government was needed. As the constitution was written and it was in the process of being ratified by all the states, the federalist papers written mostly by Alexander Hamilton were written. In one paper by James Madison, he writes “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (Doc I), which shows the concept of checks and balances could be used to keep the national government in line and controlled. The Constitution, finally ratified, was similar to Britain’s government but also different in its more active system of checks and balances.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checks and balances is the government divided into three separate and distinct branches. Each branch has been given certain safeguards to prevent abuse of power. The United States, where powers are distributed between three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. The president can veto legislation passed by Congress, but Congress can override that veto with a 2/3 vote; the president commands the army but Congress declares war and appropriates funds; the president appoints justices to the Supreme Court, but only with the approval of the Senate; Congress and the president can pass laws, but the Supreme Court can strike those laws down as unconstitutional. In designing the U.S. Constitution, our for Fathers sought to secure individual liberty against the encroachment of governmental power.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Federalist paper No. 51, James Madison argues that, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Madison wanted a system of government where the powers would be divided. He just did not want a majority to choose policy. For this reason he divided Congress into the House of Representatives and the Senate to help separate the power. Madison as well as his fellow Framers felt that the non-wealthy majority would tyrannize the wealthy minority if given political power.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To begin with, the constitution works because of checks and balances. Checks and balances is the system which the framers developed that would limit the power of one branch becoming too powerful. Balances give each branch some role in actions and power of the other branches. Checks give one branch the power to block the proceedings of the other branch. For example, Congress has the power to pass laws, but the President has the power to veto it. As a result, Congress can override the veto by a two-thirds vote in both houses. Then the judicial branch can…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Framers wanted to ensure domestic tranquilly and prevent future rebellions, but they also wanted to give certain powers to the national government and reserved the ret for the state creating the establish systems of federalism” (Magleby David.B. & Light, 2009, p. 21)…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the Framers of the constitution were in the process of creating a government, they had in mind a government that was ruled by the people. Where everyone had a voice and could have say in what the government was doing. In order to avoid a monarchy such as the one they had been used to under British rule, the framers came up with a system of checks and balances. Checks and balances keeps one branch…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Branches of Government

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through the concept of checks and balances the government is both constrained and entrusted. The rights of individuals are honored through laws enacted by the legislative branch and through the legislatives branches ability to set up court systems at the state and federal level. The president can veto a bill if he presumes. The judiciary branch interprets and has the ability to overturn both state and federal law. With each branch acting separately but equally both our laws and the rights of each individual is preserved.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitution created an ingenious way to avoid tyranny of one branch over other branches, with a system of checks and balances. James Madison wrote in the Federalist Paper”…the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as they may be a check on…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays