Preview

Trial Court: The First Level Of Courts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trial Court: The First Level Of Courts
Being a trial court is the first level of courts. Hence, being a “finder of factors”. The second is the appellate courts, which hears cases after a trial court. Thirdly, an appeal court is basically there to make sure a defendant is receiving a fair trial and that laws have been followed in the conviction of his/her crime. Lastly, is the supreme court and the highest level of courts. The job of the supreme court is it has jurisdiction over federal cases and it disputes between states. Hence, being all concerns of the federal and constitutional laws. The supreme courts make sure that the police are limited on police jurisdictions, or how they get their evidence to convict an offender. In understanding the courts, they are here to serve in …show more content…
Whereas, the judiciary systems are there to secure the people’s equality, it’s not always certain that they can. However, individual’s rights have been infringed upon in the judiciary system. These infringements are impartiality in the courts. Hence every individual is innocent until otherwise. The people should follow within in the jurisprudence in each step of the systems of being tried. All judiciary agent’s individuals must pledge before they work as a judicial agent within the courts. However, any person who goes before the judiciary system cannot be discriminated against. The Amendments written into the constitution keeps these laws and keeps any judicial agents from participating in any type of discriminatory way. However, the DA and the representative of the defendant will give all proof before the courts and this helps to keep from bias decisions upon the cases. However, for the judiciary system to function, there must be a crime, which to convict the person and then the courts will decide on their punishment. Hence, the court room actors being a part of this judiciary process. What causes crimes? Hence, researchers have found a link between mental disturbance to wrong doing. They also discovered that there were relationships between psychotic and adult criminal behavior and personality. Also, characteristics such as an ineptness to agree upon the standards and morals, or impulsive behaviors. For instance, there were two studies done. The first study was done on one- hundred and fifty- eight university students, of all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within the U.S. each state has a court system with a lower court, an appellate court and a Supreme Court that functions similar to the Supreme Court of the U.S. Four levels exist within the State Court: The lower court also known as the court of limited Jurisdiction which represents the first level in which minor cases are seen. Citizens whom are accused of not paying parking fines, those accused of prostitution, DUI and those accused of disorderly conduct in public are also tried in this court.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rochin Case Summary

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Furthermore, the decision represents the due process model because the model is concerned with equality in that all accused regardless of their social status need to be treated equally and that aspect that was not followed by the police officers in this case. This decision fits the due process because, there was use of coerced confession which are constitutionally obnoxious and inadmissible under the Due Process Clause. The case involves coerced confession which offends the sense of decency and fair play. Additionally, the due process imposes that the police should not detain or arrest an individual in order to develop their case. In this case, the court also noted that, due process rights may not be fit for every case, but the behavior of the police that “shocks the conscience” is never…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States has two types of court structures which are called a dual court system. Each of the judicial systems has their separate systems one for each of the states and the other for the Federal system. The U.S. Supreme is the only place where the two judicial systems connect.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crime is bad behavior displayed by citizens who reject societal norms and instead chose to commit crime. However, there are many types of theories of why crime occurs the most prevalent cause for crime involves the social environment of the criminal offender. Psychological theories discusses that these interruptions in childhood development is the cause for crime but because the delays developmental is the effect of the criminal’s environment. The same goes for biological theories that find genetic or biological factors that make a person more prone to become a criminal but require certain environmental factors for the person in reality to become a criminal.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some are seen as Circuit or District Courts. These circuits can ask the supreme courts to hear the case. Not all cases are eligible to be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Courts.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After describing many general advantages of the jury system, Tocqueville lays stress on the status of jury in civil causes. He considers that the judges have a supreme status when dealing civil causes because relevant legal knowledge is extremely needed in those cases. The jury has little influence in the civil causes and it is in those cases that the spirit of law can be express to the public. Hence, the public get closer to the law and constantly increase their knowledge of the law, which contributes to the influence they result in the criminal offences. Thus, the jury, “which is the most energetic means of making the people rule, is also the most efficacious means of teaching it to rule well” (p.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    to the acts of the lower federal courts. In general, the United State Supreme Court plays a special role in our constitutional system of government. Because it has power to judicial review and protects civil rights, so people call it the last resort looking for justice. The other function is the United State Supreme Court has power to examine or determine whether federal and state statutes conform to the constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    portion of the 14th amendement ; used by U.S supreme court to make certain protections in the Bill of rights applicable to the states…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nevada State Court System

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judicial system in the United States is made up by the Federal court and State court system and each court is responsible for hearing certain types of cases. The major goals of the both court systems are to solving legal disputes and vindicating legal rights. The State court system is made up with the two sets of trial courts that are the trial court of limited jurisdiction and trial court of general jurisdiction.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States has the highest authority in the Judicial Branch and is the third branch of government. The function of the Supreme Court is to interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court looks at federal and state statues and executive actions to determine if they comply with the United States Constitution. On the Supreme Court, there are nine justices that hear cases that have been appealed through the justice system. When the Supreme Court rules in a case that is the last and final ruling for the defendant.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial courts are the courts where cases begin. In the trial court, both sides present proof to demonstrate their variant of what happened. The majority of the confirmation displayed in the trial court originates from witness and shows things and records associated with the case. In appellate court there are no witnesses, and no confirmation is displayed. In appellate courts, the legal counselors essentially contend lawful and arrangement issues under the watchful eye of the judge or a gathering of judges. The other difference between the two courts are the judges. In trial courts, there is one judge in the courtroom. That judge decides what evidence can and cannot be used and often decides the outcome of the case. And lastly, the contrast between the trial courts and the appellate courts is the part of the jury. A jury is a gathering of natives who listen to the actualities and settle on choices about the case. A jury is now and again utilized as a part of trial courts to choose the case. When it comes to the appellate court, there is no jury in the courts. The appellate judges decide the result of all…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts in the United States are made up and governed by the United States Constitution and then separated by Federal and State levels. Both levels are different in how they are made up, how they run and the laws they are in charge of enforcing.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Free Legal Aid and Justice

    • 3351 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Providing assistance to people to access the justice system is one of the key functions of every welfare state. It is very essential to the State to provide legal assistance to the people who are otherwise unable to access the court and law. The very basic reason behind the incorporation and establishing of this idea is that no one would have been denied justice due to his poverty or economical backwardness. India attained the independence and became a republic by adopting a separate written constitution in which all and every functions and liabilities of the State is clearly established. As stated in the Constitution it’s the duty of the State to provide legal assistance to the poor and needy people who are helpless before the law. The Free Legal aid is thus inevitable to ensure the ‘Equality before the law’, ‘right to counsel’ and ‘right to a fair trial’. The government ready to provide the legal aid to all who are eligible. But providing the Legal Aid cannot be done and is not possible without any demand or seeking from the people. So to attain free legal aid, it is essential for the people to be aware of the existence of the same. The government has done more things to impart the awareness of free legal aid. But how far all those were reached the public is still a question to be tested. The social, cultural, economic and geographical disparity among the people plays a major and crucial role on the attainment of the thing available in the society. Thus the system of free legal aid is not an exception to this general principle as the people living in metropolitan may have more opportunities to access the free legal aid and to be aware of the same. Taking this into consideration the non doctrinal work has been initiated.…

    • 3351 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Independence

    • 3681 Words
    • 15 Pages

    An independent judiciary is necessary for a free society and a constituent democracy. It ensures the rule of law and realization of human rights and also prosperity and stability of the society. The independence of the judiciary is normally assures through the Constitution but it may also be assured through legislations, conventions and other suitable norms and practices. Following the constitution of United States, almost all constitutions lay down at least the foundation if not the entire edifices of an independent judiciary. The constitutions or the foundational laws on judiciary are however, only the starting point in the process of securing judicial independence. Ultimately the independence of the judiciary depends on the totality of a favorable environment created and backed by all state organs including the judiciary and the public opinion. The independence of judiciary also needs to be constantly guarded against the unexpected events and the changing social, political, economic conditions; it is too fragile to be left unguarded. India has given itself a liberal constitution in the Euro- American traditions, which aims at establishing a free and democratic society. It also aims at prosperity and safety of the society. Its makers believed that such a society could be created through the guarantee of fundamental rights and an independent judiciary to guard and enforce these rights. Therefore the framers of the Indian Constitution dealt with these two aspects with maximum and identical idealism.…

    • 3681 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial System of any country plays a vital role in her progress and in smooth running of state functionaries. All the developed countries of world have a well established and smooth running judicial system. Their courts are doing the justice irrespective of caste, living standards, official status of citizens and the individual powers. Even the most poor have the confidence in their courts and unbiased decision of courts are in fact a sword over the head of criminals and wrong doers in the developed countries. But, the factum of justice is totally opposite here in our country. Law and courts are for poor people and the rich or resourceful persons are immune from law, the courts are using all their powers against poor and un-resourceful persons. The law is enforced in stricto-senso against those who don’t have the resources to escape from law, and those who can bunk are easily given the way to do so, moreover, the law doesn’t even try to chase them.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics