Preview

Trees Can Kill as Well. the Longbow

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
849 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trees Can Kill as Well. the Longbow
Rashed Abdulhak
Mr. Ford
Writing II
19 February 2013
Trees Can Kill as Well
During the Middle Ages men clad in steel armor, or “knights”, were the tanks of that time. They could withstand most sword strokes and were able to charge at other knights. This resulted in both sides taking heavy casualties and battles being mostly won by sheer numbers. During the Hundred Year War England was always outnumbered by the French army. Due to England being a smaller country, most of its population were peasants. That meant less knights in the army and therefore France had an advantage. That all changed. The longbow was made for the death of enemies and it killed many men indeed. England used the longbow to win many battles and it did. England was the first country in the world to deploy the longbow. It was deployed in many battles and was the main reason why England defeated France. Many famous battles like Agincourt, Poitiers, and Crecy were won by an outnumbered English army which more than half of which were longbow men. It was highly effective because of its ability to pierce platemail at more than 100 yards. Also it was very effective because of the ability of the wielder to fire many shafts per minute (Perham).
Warfare changed because of the way battles were being fought, the time of knights was at an end. A knight spent years trying to hone his skills and raising taxes from peasants working on his land to buy armor so that he could be safe from swords. But knights were merely plucked off their horses by shafts from arrows fired by mere peasants who don’t have two guineas to rub together. This marked the end of the feudal age, where battles were survived due to more luck than skill and bravery. Why be brave when bravery is rendered useless? When a length of Birchwood with a narrow tip, that is fired by a length of Ash measuring six feet and six inches, made by a bowyer in London, and finally given to an English peasant who was the wits of a fool has the ability

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Weapons In The Crusades

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Next, weapons evolved throughout the process of the crusades. Just as the people developed armor throughout the medieval time period surrounding the crusades, knights began to use more effective and dangerous weapons in combat with their enemy. Two different types of weapons were used during the Crusades: close combat weapons such as swords, maces, spears, and poleaxes, but also long distance weapons such as long bows and crossbows. Blacksmiths softened iron and then shaped the metal into customized weights, lengths, widths, and also shape for both swords and spears. Bows would be used for long distance attack and could be used on foot or on horseback. During the Crusades, the archers with long bows would line up and fire over city walls…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to WW1, cavalry units were deemed to be a commander’s definitive principle weapon, in any case, since the beginning of WW1 and the idea of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR had shown that this was not always true; the combination of more accurate guns, more powerful artillery and the mobility of railroads made the defenders far stronger than attackers in many battles. European observers scoffed at these lessons, however, and believed that a similar situation would never occur in more civilized Europe. They were to be proved very, very wrong, at the cost of millions of lives.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way war has been fought has drastically changed over time, the tools used to fight it even more so. World War One was the first “modern war” in regards to weapons. One reason is this is the first war in which many things we consider modern war instruments were used. Remarque displays one of the most deadly of these new tools of mass destruction when het states “But that interests us less than what we hear of the new flame-thrower.” (105) The flamethrower was a new weapon used in World War One, and possible one of the most deadly. This weapon was the cause of countless deaths in the war and did so very unforgivingly, ultimately decimating bodies. Another devastating weapon that changed warfare into what we know today was the use of “…mines, gas, tanks, machine-guns…” (132). These are all weapons used to kill solders in another uniform, the enemy. These brutal weapons caused some of the most devastating deaths. Land mines would blow people to pieces if stepped on and making them physically not recognizable. Gas was one of the most gruesome weapons created in world war one. Gas would burn the soldier’s insides till he died…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the course of two centuries, the ways that wars and battles are fought have changed drastically, and yet the end goal has always remained the same, to win and not be defeated no matter at what cost. As the progression of the Industrial Revolution escalated, it paved the way for what could be produced to help military forces win in battle. Industrialization during the 18th & 19th centuries caused the battles of Waterloo and the Somme to be a great example of how industrialization helped evolve war tactics and weaponry to effectively defeat the enemy.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advancements in weaponry surpassed ancient tactics dating back to the Revolutionary War and inflicted staggering casualties. Railways allowed supplies and reinforcements to transcend conventional means, battles became fast paced requiring even more men to fuel the engine of war. These weapons and technologies bred the…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Renaissance is known as a period of advancements in trade and art and as a time where people of different backgrounds gathered together, clashing overall ways of life. One aspect that is often overlooked, however, is the effect the Renaissance had on the clashing of swords. Before the Renaissance, soldiers stood on opposites ends of each other and charged like barbarians with swords and sticks, or whatever they could scrounge together to fight. The Renaissance brought a change to the literal concept of how battles were fought. The movement away from barbaric types of warfare and towards more refined ways of fighting is demonstrated through several contributing three key facets. The factors that led to significant military advances for Europe during the Renaissance were the movement towards swifter, more durable ships that could defend themselves on the high seas and the creations that derived from gunpowder, and how it made the military weapons used before it obsolete. Ultimately, the most significant military advancement of the European Renaissance is how the Reformation created the…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many correctly regard the Battle of Agincourt as a courageous English victory, a battle where men who were tired, hungry and standing in their own diarrhoea somehow found the will to fight against an enemy almost five times larger, and won. The other common thought is also the battle was won by the use of the longbow. This is not true. The victory went to the English because of French mistakes and the men who were holding the longbows.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the American Revolution the English had a much larger army, and navy, and had the money necessary. Despite this, the American patriots were able to win their Independence from their harsh rule. First, the Americans where determined, and could raise their own army. Also, the American Patriots acquired help and Alliances, from foreign countries, which the British usually depended on. Finally, the patriots where fighting in America their homeland, a much larger country than England.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The current field of research into the cause of the downfall of the knightly class generally agrees that it was primarily a result of the introduction of gunpowder weaponry, but some recent scholarship suggests otherwise.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the American Revolutionary War the odds were pitted heavily in favor of an easy British victory. The British had the largest empire in the world at the time, the largest navy, and the best trained standing army of the day. America only had a militia, no means of raising money to obtain supplies, and no navy. Also Britain had just finished winning a war to defeat France, which gave the French a reason to help the colonies later in the war. However, even though the British were expected to win, both America and Britain had tactics that were both alike and dissimilar; which in turn played a pivotal role in the outcome of the war. What really helped the colonists during the war was a change…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why the Americans won the Revolution The Americans won the Revolutionary War against the British due to three important advantages they had in the war. The first advantage they possessed was the fact that they were fighting on and knew their own land. The British had to move their troops and supplies across the ocean. The Americans did not have to. In addition, it was hard for the British to get reinforcement and when their ships were blocked, they had no support.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A soldier trying to aim and shoot with any accuracy would have to stand much closer to his target, since the weapon’s effective range was only about 80 yards. Therefore, armies typically fought battles at a relatively close range. ”Rifles, had a much greater range than muskets did. A rifle could shoot a bullet up to 1,000 yards, and were much more accurate. Until the…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Agincourt

    • 4394 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The armies involved were those of Kings Henry V of England and Charles VI of France. Charles did not command the French army himself, as he was incapacitated. The French were commanded by Constable Charles d 'Albret and various prominent French noblemen of the Armagnac party. The battle is notable for the use of the English longbow, which Henry used in very large numbers, with longbowmen forming the vast majority of his army. The battle was also immortalised by William Shakespeare as the centrepiece of his play Henry V.…

    • 4394 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Agincourt

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the beginning, the English had 5000 archers and 900 gunmen and the French had 20,000 to 30,000 men. The two armies lined up in lines, the first 1000 yards apart. The English were the first to advance, moving into range of the archers. The French, getting shot at with arrows, charged the English lines, the French rally and push the English back killing many men. (The Great Battles)…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics