Preview

Transferred Intent Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Transferred Intent Analysis
Our text explains to us that the defendant’s intent; the actual guilty mind (mens rea) and the act (Actus Reus) can be transferred from individual to the next (Brody & Acker, 2010, p. 88). The Free Legal Dictionary defines Transferred Intent is as follows: In both criminal and tort (civil wrong) law, when an intent to cause harm to one person results in harm to another person instead of the intended target, the law transfers the intent to the actual harm ("Transferred intent legal definition of transferred intent," n.d.).

Example comes from the case of Carnes v. Thompson (1932), 48 S.W. 2d 903 a farmer and a former employee have become agree with one another and an argument ensues. At a point during the argument the farmer threw a pair

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, it is the job of the prosecution to then establish whether she also has the mens rea for her Victims’ murder. The mens rea for murder is the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. There are two types of intention: direct intention and oblique intention. Direct intention as defined by James LJ in Mohan6 is the “decision” to bring about a “particular consequence” no matter whether the Defendant “desired that consequence or not”. In the words of R.A. Duff7 direct intent can be construed from the Defendant’s actions if the Defendant would consider himself a “failure” if the “relevant consequence” did not occur. Lydia stated that she had no “malice” whatsoever to Danielle or Gemma and only intended to scare Jasmine. By applying Mohan8 it is clear that Lydia did not make the decision to throw the law reports in order to kill Danielle and would not consider herself to have failed if her actions did not cause the death of Danielle. Therefore, Lydia did not display direct intent to kill Danielle and whether or not Lydia displayed oblique intent must be explored. The cases of R v Maloney9 and Hancock and Shankland10 provided some confusion on what degree of foresight was required for a jury to infer intention from a Defendant’s actions. In Nedrick11 it was established that the jury should ask how “probable” the consequences from the Defendant’s voluntary act were and if…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    3rd Party Claim Case Brief

    • 4882 Words
    • 20 Pages

    * (1) Disputes, that if tried separately, could result in incompatible judgments or judgments that interfere with another’s right to relief…

    • 4882 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Farmer V Pilot

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The concept of 'intention' does not require that Defendant (D) know that his/her act will cause harm to the Plaintiff (P), but must know with substantial certainty that their act will result in certain outcomes (landing of the plane on the P’s land).…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    You don’t have to have intention to harm or hurt but the intention to complete action…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. Describe a real or made up example of the tort of interference. (1-5 sentences. 2.0 points)…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An important and integral case, Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States set an important standard to prevent double jeopardy. (Wiki). In this drug case, the defendant made several illegal drug sales to the same person. His defense attorney arfued that because it was the same offense, the defendant should only receive punishment for a single crime, citing that it was the same offense. However, the presiding judge stated that although the offense was the same, the offenses were committed on different days and at different times, thus m…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Violence in Hockey

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages

    One of the more popular examples of this is the very recent Todd Bertuzzi case. In this case the defendant who is Todd Bertuzzi being charged with assault causing bodily harm. On the night of March 8th, 2004 in Vancouver, Bertuzzi wished to seek revenge on the plaintiff Steven Moore, after a so called "cheap shot", which Steve Moore hit Bertuzzi's teammate Markus Naslund with an elbow in a previous game. Late in the hockey game Bertuzzi proceeded to skate up behind Moore and grabbed his shoulder and ‘sucker punched' Moore in the side of the head, Moore then fell to the ice while a pile-up of players fell on top of him. Moore suffered fractured vertebrae, nerve damage, and a concussion. Right away this was being looked at by Vancouver Police Officials and the decision was whether or not this should be viewed from a legal standpoint. Arguments went back and forth with opinions after opinions.…

    • 2046 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * MR is the guilty mind. Note that it is not necessarily a moral/culpable judgment, and there can be involuntary MR e.g. drugged paedophile in Kingston. * There are many MR states of mind: the sentencing advisory panel stated that there are 4 levels of culpability = intent, recklessness, knowledge, and negligence [in some crimes only negligence is required * Two species of MR Cognitive (involves intention or foresight by D) and Normative (evaluation of D action taking into account surrounding circumstance and D state of mind) * Proof of Cognitive = subjective test (assume state of mind is ascertainable only direct evidence is a confession) – jury ascertain reasonable person but destroy subjectivity * DPP v Smith = D trying to escape from the police in a car was signalled to stop. He did not do so. A PC jumped onto the car's bonnet. D drove at high speed, swerving from side to side, until the officer was thrown off and killed. = CJA S8 – endorses the idea that intention is to be subjectively ascertained…

    • 2945 Words
    • 85 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Stuff

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For example, Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) was a case presented in an English Court room. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Impact on actus reus (victim’s actual consent/ non-consent) and mens rea (offender’s understanding of consent / non-consent)…

    • 2265 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juries

    • 3519 Words
    • 15 Pages

    R v McKenna (1960) – in this case the judge at the trial had threatened the jury if they did not return with a verdict within 10 minutes they would be locked up all night. The jury returned with a verdict of guilty but the defendant’s conviction was quashed on appeal because of the judge’s interference.…

    • 3519 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exception: Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co (2002): Pilot tried to have a cynical ploy to force Mrs Whiten to settle claim for lower sum…

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Notes for acceptance

    • 704 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this case based on case : Hyde v Wrench ( 1940) 3 Bench 334.…

    • 704 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Direct intent refers to a defendant’s aim, purpose or desire as it is where the defendant intends for…

    • 4930 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays