Transcendental Argument
1. Offense
Offense is having a response to the objections of unbelievers as well as attacking any untruths that rise against the Christian faith. Which is why offense can be designated as the defense of faith. However, by the preceding definition can be confused as to the true meaning of the definition. It exposes lofty thinking and when it is done correctly it works in perfect harmony with the defense and proof.
2. Reason
Is also known as the transcendental argument. This shows that Christianity is the necessary presupposition of meaning and rationality. If that statement is believed to be true than the denial of Christianity denies all meaning and rationality.
3. Argument
An apologetic argument is no more neutral than any other human activity. This argument is where one would presuppose the truth of God’s word. It must be of representation of who God is. It is vital to either accept God’s authority, but if you don’t, it is sin. There many types of arguments, and many ways to defend the faith with an argument. An argument must be an …show more content…
Sense God and scripture are precisely the matters in question. It is important not to make assumptions about them in the argument. If one were to do that it would become secular thinking. Avoid making any arguments on neutral bases. This is called the tradition or classic method because it claims many advocates through church history. Specifically, the second-century apologist such as Justin Martyr, and Theophilus. A deeper explination of the Classical apologist tells the unbeliever to think neutrally during the apologeticencounter and they do seek to develop a neutral argument. One that has no distinctively biblically presuppositions but does this kind of neutrality exist. Historically since the beginning of apologetics it has been common for Christians to claim some sort of neutral ground. Principles that mutually believers and unbelievers can except without compromising their
Offense is having a response to the objections of unbelievers as well as attacking any untruths that rise against the Christian faith. Which is why offense can be designated as the defense of faith. However, by the preceding definition can be confused as to the true meaning of the definition. It exposes lofty thinking and when it is done correctly it works in perfect harmony with the defense and proof.
2. Reason
Is also known as the transcendental argument. This shows that Christianity is the necessary presupposition of meaning and rationality. If that statement is believed to be true than the denial of Christianity denies all meaning and rationality.
3. Argument
An apologetic argument is no more neutral than any other human activity. This argument is where one would presuppose the truth of God’s word. It must be of representation of who God is. It is vital to either accept God’s authority, but if you don’t, it is sin. There many types of arguments, and many ways to defend the faith with an argument. An argument must be an …show more content…
Sense God and scripture are precisely the matters in question. It is important not to make assumptions about them in the argument. If one were to do that it would become secular thinking. Avoid making any arguments on neutral bases. This is called the tradition or classic method because it claims many advocates through church history. Specifically, the second-century apologist such as Justin Martyr, and Theophilus. A deeper explination of the Classical apologist tells the unbeliever to think neutrally during the apologeticencounter and they do seek to develop a neutral argument. One that has no distinctively biblically presuppositions but does this kind of neutrality exist. Historically since the beginning of apologetics it has been common for Christians to claim some sort of neutral ground. Principles that mutually believers and unbelievers can except without compromising their