Transaction Costs in Assessing Canadian
Government Services Sector P3s
Prof. Murray Cooke
March 20, 2012
Every public private partnership differs in its ability to achieve efficiency. However, some sectors seem to have inherent differences in terms of the types of risk they subject projects to, and the subsequent transaction costs involved. The challenge in assessing the use of public private partnerships is to create a baseline against which individual projects can be compared. John and Salim Loxley make the case for Value-for-Money assessments, which should include Public Sector Comparisons for partnerships. This paper attempts to show that higher quality VfM assessments must include transaction costs in the equation to establish value. It goes on to explore the variables that most impact transaction costs in the sector of government services. This paper agrees with the literature that transaction costs are a critical element too often excluded from value equations. Secondly, it finds that despite difficulty in distinguishing the category the government services sector shows some propensity towards higher transaction costs due to a push for electronic service delivery due to high levels of uncertainty, long contract lengths, and asset specificity on the part of private partners.
This paper employs a mixed approach of explanatory case study and systematic literature review to identify what measures were used to assess the performance of public private partnerships (“hereafter P3s”) in the government service sector, what previous research has determined as their level of performance, and the variables that influenced their success. The paper is structured to first discuss how transaction costs factor into efficiency assessments and explore what variables influence these costs. The paper then goes on to analyze cases of P3s in the government services sector against these variables, in order to explore the relationship between the government services sector and transaction costs. The relationship is then evaluated against the perceived success of P3 projects. Given the data limitations and its prescribed length, this paper has chosen to narrow the scope of its assessment to what has been called a hidden cost of Value-for-Money assessments: transaction costs. The limitations of this study are the reliance on underdeveloped existing data, limited access to project documentation, a small sample of cases, and changes to public actor competencies with the introduction of specialized P3 agencies. The time span offered by the case studies is short; out of the six cases used by this paper, the oldest dates back only 12 years. Access to data on projects presents a limitation in that materials used in doing preliminary assessments, contracts, and other project documents are often inaccessible to the public. This paper also assumes a bias in that disparaging data has a higher probability of being suppressed, particularly since the main sources of case study data- the Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships (hereafter the “CCPPP”) and project proponents both public & private- are P3 advocates.
In order to assess the use of P3s, we must begin by defining the terms, identifying relevant variables, and establishing criteria for a baseline. John and Salim Loxley make the case for better Value-for-Money assessments including Public Sector Comparisons for P3s in his book Public Sector Private Profits (2010: 180). Higher quality VfM assessments include address of transaction costs. The following section begins by discussing why transaction costs are relevant to assessments of efficiency, and explores further what variables influence these costs. Sourcing & Transaction Costs
Sourcing refers to a number of procurement practices, including traditional procurement, outsourcing to the private sector, or partnership hybrids such as P3s. Sourcing decisions are driven by...
Cited: Alberta. Alberta Treasury Board and Enterprise. 2011. Inventory of Major Alberta Projects. www.albertacanada.com/about-alberta/inventory-of-major-projects.html.
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. 2011. 2011 Annual Financial Report. http://www.aecl.ca/Assets/Publications/Reports/2011_AFR_Eng.pdf
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
Bajari, Patrick and Tadelis, Steven. 2001. “Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts.” The RAND Journal of Economics, 32:3, 387-407.
Banducci, Patrizia. 2010. “The Role of Public-Private Partnership Agencies in Canadian Infrastructure Projects.” Publication of the Swiss Canadian Chamber of Commerce Toronto and Montreal, April/May Issue, 4-7.
Becker, Fred and Patterson, Valerie. 2005. “Private Partnerships: Balancing Financial Returns, Risks, and Roles of the Partners.” Public Performance & Management Review 29:2, 125-44.
de Bettignies, J.E. and Ross, T.W. 2004. “The Economics of Public-Private Partnerships.” Canadian Public Policy, 30:2, 135-154.
Borins, Sandford. 2003. “Contracting and Partnerships in IT Services to Government.” A paper for the Panel on the Role of Government. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
British Columbia. Partnerships British Columbia. 2011. 2010-2011 Annual Report. http://www.partnershipsbc.ca/files-4/publications.php.
British Columbia. Partnerships British Columbia. 2011. 2012/13-2014/15 Service Plan. http://www.partnershipsbc.ca/files-4/publications.php.
Canada. PPP Canada. 2011. 2010-2011 Annual Report. http://www.p3canada.ca/annual-reports.php
Canada. Public Works and Government Services Canada. 2012. Request for Expression of Interest. AECL Nuclear Laboratories Restructuring, Ottawa: Atomic Energy of Canada Limited.
Drummond, Don. 2012. Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public- Public Services for Ontarians: A Path To Sustainability and Excellence. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Dutil, Patrice; Cosmo Howard; John Langford and Jeffrey Roy. 2010. The Service State: Rhetoric, Reality and Promise. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Ghere, R.K. 2001. “Probing the Strategic Intricacies of Public-Private Partnership: The Patent as a Comparative Reference.” Public Administration Review, 61:4, 441-451.
Hrab, Roy. 2004. “Private Delivery of Public Services: Public Private Partnerships and Contracting-Out.” Panel on the Role of Government in Ontario Research Paper No. 21. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Iacobacci, Mario. 2010. Dispelling the Myths: A Pan-Canadian Assessment of Public-Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Investments. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada, i-81.
Lonsdale, Chris. 2005. “Contractual Uncertainty, Power and Public Contracting.” Journal of Public Policy 25:2, 219-240.
Loxley, John and Salim Loxley. 2010. Public Service, Private Profits: The Political Economy of Public-Private Partnerships in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood.
Maher, M.E. 1997. “Transaction cost economics and contractual relations.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21, 147-170.
McCarthy, Ian and Anagnostou, Angela. 2004. “The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and boundaries of manufacturing.” International Journal of Production Economics, 88, 61–71.
McGuinness, T. 1994. "Markets and Managerial Hierarchies." In G. Thompson, et al. (Eds.), Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, Sage, London, England, 66-81.
Ontario. Infrastructure Ontario. 2009. 2008/09 Annual Report. http://www.infrastructureontario.ca/About-Us/Annual-Reports/
Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Keatley Surveying Ltd. and Teranet Inc. (2011) Court File No. CV-10-414169-00CP. Affidavit of Arthur Daniels, sworn July 28, 2011.
Parker, David and Hartley, Keith. 2003. “Transaction costs, relational contracting and public private partnerships: a case study of UK defence.” Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 9, 97–108.
Reeves, Eoin. 2008. “The Practice Of Contracting In Public Private Partnerships: Transaction Costs And Relational Contracting In The Irish Schools Sector.” Public Administration, 86:4, 969–986.
Singh, Avantika and Prakash, Gyan. 2010. “Public–Private Partnerships In Health Services Delivery A Network Organizations Perspective.” Public Management Review 12:6, 829–856.
Vining, A. R., Boardman, A. E. and Poschmann, Finn. 2005. “Public–Private Partnerships in the US and Canada:‘There Are No Free Lunches’.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis,7:3, 199- 220.
Williamson, O.E. 2002. “The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16:3, 171-195.
Williamson, O.E. 2010. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Natural Progression.” Journal of Retailing, 86, 215–226.
Zaheer, Srilata and Zaheer, Akbar. 2006. “Trust across Borders.” Journal of International Business Studies, 37:1, 21-29.
[ 14 ]. McGuinness, T. "Markets and Managerial Hierarchies." In G. Thompson, et al. (Eds.), Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, Sage, London, England, 1994, pp. 66-81.
[ 23 ]. Gerber, James “International Economics: Third Edition” Pearson Education Inc. Arlington: Addison-Wesley (2005)
Please join StudyMode to read the full document