Preview

Trail Of Tears Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trail Of Tears Analysis
Most people are conscious of the devastating effects The Trail of Tears had on the Cherokee people, some question its necessity and the mindset of President Andrew Jackson to not only let this horrific affair to take lace but to fight tooth and nail for this policy. Despite the plethora of writings in place regarding the injustices that the Native Americans endured during the Trail of Tears very little attention has been given to why the people of that time would allow this forced removal to take place. This paper will analyze the immoral, unconstitutional and illegal engagements that took place during the development of President Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy as well as the actions instigating the trail of trails and the devastating …show more content…
Government would begin to fray. The U.S. Government would continue to drag its feet in payment owed under the terms of past treaties and strong arming the Cherokees to sell off more land. The Cherokees had formed a powerful new central government to push back, they were determined to not let go of anymore land. With a strong central government the Cherokees could hold the United States to its word for a while but, the situation on the ground was changing nonetheless.
The vision of wealth and prosperity grew stronger within the American people and cotton fields were the means of this wealth. Other tribes were giving up copious amounts of their land till the Cherokees found themselves surrounded on every side by American settlers. Cherokees themselves were experiencing change and advancing as a “civilized” nation. Sequoyah, a Cherokee leader devised an alphabet and within a matter of a few years the Cherokee Nation was literate and were able to revolutionize their beliefs and stories into
…show more content…
Meetings of the Cherokee Legislature and courts were deemed illegal, anyone living on Cherokee land and not Cherokee were subject to approval to do so under Georgia law. Some who refuse like Samuel Worchester, a white missionary who lived on Cherokee territory for years would was jailed and sentenced to “hard labor.” Georgia state legislator efforts were essentially to write the Cherokees out of existence, ignoring the nation’s constitution, borders and laws in the pursuit of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Essay On Indian Removal

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Cherokees' march was a forced one under the direction of the United States army. “The Trail of Tears was the most sorrowful legacy of the Jacksonian Era”, (ushistory.org n.d.). Over 4,000 Cherokees died in 1838 and 1839 on their way to present-day Oklahoma, during Andrew Jackson's Indian removal (The Trail of Tears 1942). Missionaries who had invested their time and money teaching Indians about Christianity were against the removal of the Indians, many of whom lobbied Congress to oppose the act (Kidwell n.d.). The Trail of Tears marked the movement of the Indians to their soon to be home, west of the river. The unfair treatment towards these nations emphasized that Americans where hungry for land and there was nothing that could stop them from getting it. Americans felt the need to control communities through the creation of laws that would inevitably discourage others from helping the native tribes succeed in a civilized world. To the point where it was a crime for non-natives to attempt to reside in Indian communities, in hopes to prevent further adaptation among…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronal Takaki opens our eyes to a different view of one of our early presidents. Andrew Jackson was for removing the Indians, “He supported the efforts of Mississippi and Georgia to abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 81). He believed that the deaths of Indians meant that America was advancing civilization. Andrew did not feel guilty about what he stood for. Although they were laws that protected the Indians and their land, he did not obey them. Instead, he would ignore them, “Supreme Court ruled that…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s when America was still developing as a new country, there were still many conflicts proceeding throughout that period. Andrew Jackson served as the seventh president and his main concern was the removal of the Cherokee tribe from their own land. As a result, the Cherokee people were divided amongst themselves because of this act President Jackson wanted to enforce. While many Cherokee people ignored Jackson’s instructions and stayed on their land, few did go to what is now Oklahoma. Even before they were told to migrate to federal lands, the society of Cherokee was still divided. The money distributed throughout their original land was not equal. The rich got more while the poor got less; much like today, still.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trail of Tears

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reading Analysis Guide: Trail of Tears Part A The author, Dee Brown, gives a brief description about Andrew Jackson’s policy on Indian removal in order to gain popularity and power. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the cause and effects of “Indian Removal” during Jackson’s terms, ultimately creating the “Trail of Tears.” As early as the colonial period Indian removal was evident, Brown claims. Indians never really got along with white settlers, and even if they tried to resolve the conflicts, it would fail. Indian Removal calmed down over time but in 1828, Andrew Jackson ran for president and immediately knew he would have to wipe out the frontier states. He made a treaty in which the Indians had to remove themselves from the states and move west toward the Mississippi. On there “trip” to the Mississippi, Indians faced many hardships that included starvation, death, and disease.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John G. Burnett

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During Andrew Jackson’s presidency from 1829 to 1837, a lot of controversial decisions were made. The removal of Cherokee Indians in the 1830’s was one, and this was more a change of the national policy than a reformulation. Since the Spanish came to the New World from the 1500’s, the continent’s inhabitants- Indians, were there. Beginning from the Washington government in the 1790’s, the policy United States used to administrate the Indians was civilization and assimilation. Under the ambitious administration of Andrew Jackson, who was in favor of Western speculation, the Indians were forced to move from their homeland by the American Army. This is where John G. Burnett really endures the pain that the Indians felt.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Cherokee people were forced out of their land because of the settler’s greed for everything and anything the land had to offer. Many Cherokee even embraced the “civilization program,” abandoning their own beliefs so that they may be accepted by white settlers. Unfortunately for the Cherokee though, the settlers would never accept them as an equal citizen. A quote from historian Richard White says it very well, “The Cherokee are probably the most tragic instance of what could have succeeded in American Indian policy and didn’t. All these things that Americans would proudly see as the hallmarks of civilization are going to the West by Indian people. They do everything they were asked except one thing. What the Cherokees ultimately are, they may be Christian, they may be literate, they may have a government like ours, but ultimately they are Indian. And in the end, being Indian is what killed them.”…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Cherokee Removal Essay In the early nineteenth century, an infant America was increasing in population and expanding in the South until settlers were faced with the dilemma of the Native Americans. Anglo-Americans had two very distinct stances on how to deal with southern Indian tribes, particularly the Cherokee. One side was eager for land and developed the idea that Indians were both racially and culturally inferior and a hindrance to American progress, while on the other hand, some Americans believed that the Cherokee tribe was a sovereign, independent nation and that moral responsibility required the United States to protect them.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    letting his personal beliefs affect his political life. Alfred A. Cave describes, at length, the Indian Removal Act, motivations behind the removal, as well as Jackson’s personal beliefs on the Indian tribes and his blatant refusal to acknowledge Indian treaties.25 While Professor Cave provides numerous references to Jackson’s refusal to deal with the Indian population, the most important aspect of his work, as it deals with…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His/125 the West

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Americans had been traveling westward in small numbers until the late 1840’s when gold was discovered throughout the region. Afterwards, Americans passed through the plains regions in heavy numbers seeking fortunes and gold presenting significant problems for the Sioux. They decimated the land and water ecosystems, drove away the bison herds and messed up their migrations patterns, and introduced more disease. Already the Sioux’s numbers and culture began taking a hit. By the late 19th century Americans were building large railroad systems connecting the East with the West and even more Americans were drawn to the plains regions thanks to the Homestead Act of 1862. The tribal system of the Sioux was progressively torn apart thanks to their land being taken over by white settlers. The government, particularly President Grant, purposed and passed many treaties of peace, but wasn’t able to properly enforce them causing American military personnel and citizens to become openly hostile. These peace policies’ required Plains Indians to live in small reservations, receive a ration of food and supplies from the U.S. government, and adapt American ideals. The small reservations were built on land with soil that could not be harvested and were constantly being invaded by the surrounding white population, and corruption within the U.S. government allowed many White settlers to eventually take over reservation land, further confining the Plains Indians to a smaller and smaller territory. Continued battles caused the Plains Indian’s numbers to dwindle severely and their culture to all but vanish. The tribal system was broken down requiring the Indians to submit to the U.S. views of individualistic representation and not tribal governments. The government passed a series of Acts…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme court supported the Cherokee in favor to not let Georgia force them off their land. The Cherokee were tired of fighting and learned to compromise, instead of resulting to scalping and burning people alive. The Cherokee decided to educate themselves. Their leaders were well educated. They even had a constitution, schools, and a newspaper. They went to the president to show him that they were civilized, and that they could hopefully stay. The Cherokee nation were shocked when he said there was nothing he can do. This information was from the article called, “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act”, it stated in quote, “Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper.” This means that instead of leaving their homeland, they can compromise and become more civilized. The Cherokee did not stop because they wanted their freedom. The Cherokee went to William Wirt to take their situation to the Supreme Court. William Wirt took it to court and argued that the independent nation was regarded by the U.S. and its many treaties with them. Then it went to John Marshall, but it was rejected. Until they read John Marshall’s decision, and knew they were going to win. The final decision came and the Cherokee stayed. They were also encouraged by missionaries. This was gotten from the article called “Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act.”…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Indians once settled in the Great Lake region of the United States. The Indians migrated south to the region which is now Georgia. Once settled in the south, the Cherokee tribe prospered. The tribe constructed a written language, built cities which included a capital city, and developed a constitution among the Cherokee people. When the White settlers began settling in the Cherokee lands, they showed much discrimination against the tribes. The settlers believed the Indians did not belong and they had the right to take over their lands. The tribe reached out to the government for assistance, but received no sympathy. The cry for help turned into a treaty to make the Indians move from their already settled homelands to areas west of the Mississippi River (Hicks, 2011).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    D.E. US History 12-10-13 Indian Removal Policy Land disputes and law jurisdiction cases had begun to appear quite frequently in the United States Supreme Court during the time the Indian Policy was put into effect after the war. Congress had to address the situation so they came up with the Indian Policy. It was concluded that, “discovery also gave the discoverer the exclusive right to extinguish Indian title either by purchase or by conquest. Natives were recognized only as temporary occupants of the land, and not as owners (Learn NC). The decision to move the Cherokee Indians to lands west of the Mississippi River, decided by the Jackson administration, was more of a reformulation of the national policy that had been in effect since the 1790’s.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was a new debate in Congress about an act that would make the Native Americans move out of their homeland and into west America. It stirred many questions. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was at the time, thought to be justified and acceptable. There were two groups, the people who wanted the Indian’s gone, and the people who believed they should be allowed to stay. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 that forced the Indians out of their territory was immoral, had no effect on the state of Georgia, and it increased conflict between the Native American tribes.…

    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays