Can you imagine the amount of knowledge that is driven away by students throughout summer break? Lately, the Union City Board of Education has been considering that it may be necessary to switch from the traditional school year to having year round school in order to properly educate the students in this area. In my personal opinion, I most likely agree with the Union City Board of Education do to the following reasons. First of all, more time would be spent on teaching new material in opposed to reviewing old material because of summer loss. In addition, with a 15-day break after 45 days of instruction students are able to recover and refresh. Third of all, it eliminates the need for summer enrichment programs families may not be able to afford. Clearly, these reasons should be carefully considered.
To begin with, more time is spent on teaching new material in opposed to reviewing old material because of summer loss. Usually with year round school, teachers have sufficient time to teach everything that has to be covered for the following school year. Why do students lack of knowledge at the beginning of the school year? When students are off to there two-month summer break they automatically forget the majority of lessons they learned the previous year. A 1994 study of three year-round California elementary schools showed that each of the three schools demonstrated significant achievement gains for its highly targeted at-risk students, including low-performing students and English-language learners. Why not provide the proper education students need?
I cannot argue with the fact that students forget many lessons from the previous year do to the summer breaks scheduled by the district. Although, it is the students
responsibility to stay on task with there studies and lessons learned. That is why with a year-round school, their education and skills will help save time from having to review old materials throughout the new year. This will not only...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document