Traditional Litigation and the Non-Traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution

Topics: Dispute resolution, Alternative dispute resolution, Mediation Pages: 2 (562 words) Published: October 15, 2012
Traditional Litigation and the Non-Traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution There are many ways to handle a dispute. Many people chose to use the traditional litigation system, which are lawsuit being brought forth in the courts and some people choose alternative routes which may not always be involved in the court. The formal definition of traditional litigation is “the process of bringing, maintaining, and defending a lawsuit. This is also called judicial dispute resolution because courts are used to decide the case” (Cheeseman, 2010). Alternative Dispute Resolution is defined as “methods of resolving disputes other than litigation” (Cheeseman, 2010).

Alternative Dispute Resolution
By far the most common form of ADR is arbitration, however other types of ADR exist such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and the use of a judicial referee. “Negotiation is a procedure whereby the parties to a dispute engage in negotiations to try to reach a voluntary settlement of their dispute” (Cheeseman, 2010). Negotiations can go on for an extended amount of time to ensure that both parties are satisfied. Mediation is another type of ADR in which all parties involved in the issue select and agreed to use neutral third party that assumes the role of an intermediary that between both parties. The sole purpose of this intermediary is to facilitate a settlement between the parties. If an accord is reached by the disputing parties, then a settlement agreement is written and executed by the parties. Conciliation is a method of ADR frequently used when the parties involve do not wish to face each other in a confrontational venue. In this method an interested party known as a conciliator assists the party’s dispute to reach a settlement. The conciliator facilitates this process by the communicating offers and counter-offers of settlement between the two parties. Traditional Litigation System

The traditional litigation system is where two...

References: Cheeseman, H.R. (2010). Business law: Legal environment, online commerce, business
ethics, and international issues (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Traditional Litigation vs. Non-Traditional Adr

    ...Traditional Litigation vs. Non-traditional ADR University of Phoenix – LAW/531 March 18, 2012 Abstract Several of the non-traditional forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) offer benefits that traditional litigation cannot offer. The following few paragraphs will compare and contrast traditional litigation as compared to the more non-traditional forms of ADR. Litigation vs. Non-Traditional ADR Determining the ideal method for resolving a business dispute can be a challenge for businesses. A business that does not have a large cash reserve and time to sit in a court room may need to consider the non-traditional forms of dispute resolution. In some cases clients insist that the cases be heard and decided by a judge, at which point traditional litigation would be the course of action. (Steven Harms, 2011) Some of the most popular forms of non-traditional ADR are Arbitration, Mediation and Negotiation. Arbitration is a legal technique where the parties to a dispute refer it to one or more persons, the arbitrators, by whose decision they agree to be bound....

    Read More
    733 Words 3 Pages
  • Traditional and Non-Traditional Essay

    ...Tradition and Non-tradition Litigation Student Name Affiliation Litigation refers to a legal, a judicial contest or a law enforcement preceding that normally takes place in a court in order to determine the outcome of the case on either party. What are the risks that businesses and other organizations encounter when dealing with traditional litigation? The business risks to either lose or gain at the end of the court proceeding. Lose of Time- The process of handling traditional litigation in relation to businesses and organizations normally forms a crucial scenario as it affects the firm’s entire performance either positively or negatively. While undertaking on the traditional litigation, the business/organization spends much of its time in handling the relevant case in legal institutions. Time is a key factor that ensures efficiency and effectiveness in the functioning of any given firm. Delays caused by attendance to the litigation by the firm’s management may lead to lower production in the organizations activities (Carroll, 2005). Confidentiality- The organizations relationship with its customer through the Customer Relation management (CRM) is vital in maintaining trust and confidentiality in its services and products. The traditional litigations ruins the customer relationship with the firm...

    Read More
    5165 Words 14 Pages
  • Alternate Dispute Resolution vs. Traditional Litigation Essay

    ...Alternate Dispute Resolution vs. Traditional Litigation Jane Sully LAW 531 November 14, 2011 Judith Gray, M.A., J.D. Alternate Dispute Resolution vs. Traditional Litigation Alternate dispute resolution, as its name implies, offers an alternative to traditional civil litigation. The time and cost to bring a traditional civil case to trial are enormous. Alternate dispute resolution offers a more efficient settlement of disputes both in terms of time and money and has other benefits. Time to Trial The length of time from the filing of a civil case to completion of a trial can, depending on a person’s location, take from one year to more than 10 years. This is due to the complexity of the court system. The defendant must be given notice and time to respond to the complaint. Then there is the discovery period and its interrogatories, depositions and requests for documents. It may be months before a date convenient to both side’s attorneys, and a third party to be deposed, can be set. Then there are the motions and counter motions that are filed and ruled on. Finally, even having a court date is no guaranty that the trial will start on that date. Either attorney could ask for a continuance or if your case is not scheduled...

    Read More
    738 Words 2 Pages
  • Traditional vs Non Traditional Forms of Litigation Essay

    ...TRADITIONAL VS NON TRADITIONAL FORMS OF LITIGATION PAPER By Charlton Rodriguez Law Class The traditional and nontraditional form of litigation Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is debated on a daily basis as to its effectiveness over one another. In this paper i will discuss both forms of litigation procedures followed and how they relate and distinct from one another.                The traditional form of litigation is the older most over used form to resolve civil or other court matter issues that sometimes involves a jury or trial where a Felony is involved. The traditional system is known to be a trial procedure where there is more formality involved where judgments are more enforced through the court system. The traditional system offers three known aspects which are: answer, discovery and trial. The newer and highly growing form of litigation being used is called the Alternative Dispute Resolution. The ADR is in most cases the opposite of the traditional trial method. The ADR is known to offer more effective settlements...

    Read More
    555 Words 2 Pages
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

    ...Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") processes are alternative methods of helping people resolve legal problems before going to court. ADR involves an independent third person, called a "neutral" who tries to help resolve or narrow the areas of conflict.  Most civil disputes are resolved without filing a lawsuit, and most civil lawsuits are resolved without a trial. The courts and others offer a variety of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes to help people resolve disputes without a trial. ADR is usually less formal, less expensive, and less time-consuming than a trial. ADR is generally classified into at least four types: negotiation, collaborative law, mediation, and arbitration. Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties, intended to reach an understanding, resolve point of difference, or gain advantage in outcome of dialogue. Negotiation is intended to aim at compromise. Collaborative law (also called collaborative practice, divorce, or family law) is a legal process enabling couples who have decided to separate or end their marriage to work with their lawyers. The voluntary process is initiated when the couple signs a contract (called the "participation agreement"), binding each other to the process and disqualifying their respective lawyer's right to represent either one in any future family related...

    Read More
    1185 Words 4 Pages
  • Nontraditional and Traditional Litigation Paper

    ...Running Head: TRADITIONAL AND NONTRADITIONAL LITIGATION PAPER Nontraditional and Traditional Litigation Paper Law/531 Rulon Huntsman July 21, 2011 Week One Option Two Nontraditional and Traditional Litigation Paper When learning what litigation is and how to use it in the legal system can have a lasting effect on the court systems. In this paper will clarify the legal issues presented in the Litigation and Alternatives Video. The alternative dispute resolution (ADR) works as options to resolving certain issues in the litigation process. The attorney’s fees and filing lawsuits is part of the consequences that litigation is a very expensive process. The expense of Litigation is not only time-consuming, but the outcome can cause emotional damage and extremely unpredictable. The alternative dispute resolution includes arbitration and mediation is methods to resolve certain litigation inadequacies. Learning how mediation and arbitration is presented as third party for neutral ground. When using arbitration and mediation both parties can avoid the litigating dispute process by employing a mediator as a non-binding procedure that arbitrator use in binding procedures. However,...

    Read More
    714 Words 3 Pages
  • Analysis Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

    ...the processes available in alternative dispute resolution and explain its advantages and disadvantages. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves dispute resolution processes and techniques that fall outside of the government judicial process. There has been moves against ADR in the past by entities of many political parties and their associates, despite this, ADR has gained inclusive acceptance among both the broad community and the legal profession in past years. In fact, many courts now entail some parties to remedy to ADR of some type, usually mediation, before allowing the parties' cases to be tried. The increasing attractiveness of ADR can be clarified by the increasing caseload of traditional courts, the perception that ADR imposes fewer costs than litigation, a preference for confidentiality, and the desire of some parties to obtain larger control over the selection of the individual or individuals who will decide their dispute. ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions for disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is a more of a official adjudicative and adversary technique – initially a confidential litigation process...

    Read More
    1955 Words 5 Pages
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

    ...essay alternative dispute resolution (ADR) will be examined. I will have a critical look at the key types as well as their usefulness in fulfilling the objective of access to justice. ADR represents a variety of processes all aiming to resolve disputes between potential litigants out of court. The parties agree on the type of process used and the independent third party. The main reason for adopting ADR, however, is dissatisfaction with litigation. Especially after the introduction of new issue fees that came into force on January 4th , many people are deterred from bringing their disputes to court by the financial barriers. Colin Ettinger, President of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, describes the circumstances as ‘unjust and unfair for litigants, especially those suffering from a personal injury, to fund - via fees and cost recovery - a civil court service which is meant to operate for the public good.'¹ Reducing both hearing related as well as case preparation costs, ADR is increasingly adopted to resolve civil disputes. But not only costs were a major problem of the court processes. ‘My concern, however, is with access to justice, and hence with reductions in cost, delay and complexity. The argument for the universal application of the full, ‘red-blooded' adversarial approach is appropriate only if questions of cost and time are put aside. The present...

    Read More
    1216 Words 4 Pages

Popular Essays

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free