Preview

Tort Scenarios

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Scenarios
Tort Scenarios
BUS/415

Introduction In week three we were provided with two scenarios and were asked to analyze the tort actions found in both. The first scenario involves fans and participants at a football game; including a father and son, and angry fan, stadium workers, and other spectators. Actions that transpire include the spilling of beer on one fan by another, a shove of one fan of anther, a fall, injury, yelling, and repercussions of the stated actions. The second scenario we analyzed took place in a restaurant where another chain of events occur including a customer biting down on a piece of glass, waiters bumping into each other, smoke inhalation by customers, and injuries caused in one way or another by the described events. In this paper we will identify the tort actions found in both scenarios, identify the potential plaintiffs, and identify the potential defendants and why they are each seen as a defendant. We will also examine the elements of the tort claims that constitute the plaintiff’s claim and the defenses that could be asserted by the defendants. We will also discuss how we believe the claims will be resolved by stating legal reasons for the answers.
Plaintiffs and Defendants: Scenario 1 Each scenario describes a chain of events that one would not typically imagine could happen throughout the course of a usual day, but seems to be possible. In each of these instances, there are acts that would lead to charges being filed in a court of law. The different people involved would have to present their sides of the situation as plaintiff and defendant. In the first scenario where Daniel and his son are trying to enjoy a day at a football game, there are different twists that lead to different people being the plaintiff and defendant and in separate instances ending up as both. To start, the quarterback is injured thus throwing an errant ball into the stands injuring a fan. The injured fan could file charges as the plaintiff.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The court held Buick liable in tort for negligence in manufacturing a product with a danger. Buick argued that it should not be liable because it did not make the wheels. Why not make the injured party sue the producer of the defective part?…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    GBL 295 EXAM 2

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages

    providing private remedy for injury to one party caused by the tortious conduct of another…

    • 1533 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Manning v. Grimsley, David Manning JR. was a spectator at a baseball game. Manning sued the Baltimore Orioles and Ross Grimsley for battery under tort law after injuries suffered from a thrown ball. In my opinion, the defendant did not intend harm. However, the defendant unintentionally caused injury to the plaintiff and is liable under the elements of negligence. Second, the Baltimore Orioles are liable because Grimsley was acting in the capacity of an employee at the time of the incident.…

    • 618 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rsm225 Assignment 2

    • 3848 Words
    • 16 Pages

    If the young man wants to sue whoever is responsible for this tragedy, he must claim that the occupier of that theatre was negligence; otherwise, he won’t get any compensation for the injury…

    • 3848 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Scenario Paper

    • 1781 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What tort actions do see and the identity of potential plaintiffs? Intentional battery - (Plaintiff, Malik v. Ruben) Malik can file a claim against Ruben for pushing him. Ruben would be liable for any physical harm sustained due to the physical contact. Unintentional negligence- (Plaintiff, Malik v. Stadium) Malik can sue for the stadium railing collapsing when he was pushed into it. The stadium did breach its duty of care and should be liable for some of Malik’s damages because it gave way. Strict Liability- (Plaintiff, Stadium v. Railing Manufacture or installer) The Stadium could sue the manufacture for a defective railing or installer because the railing collapsed. Negligence-Defamation of Character (Plaintiff, Daniel versus Lady in line) Daniel sues the lady in line for falsely accusing him of giving his child beer. Negligence-Infliction of emotion distress (Plaintiff, Ruben & Daniel versus Malik) Ruben sues for harassment with an unloaded fire arm. This is outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly. Negligence, (Plaintiff, Daniel versus Stadium or Drink Manufacture), the sugary drink caused Daniel diabetic the stadium had a greater duty of care to provide a warning.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real issue before us is whether we should now replace the doctrine of joint and several liability with one in which the liability of codefendants to the plaintiff is apportioned according to each defendant 's respective fault. According to Disney, this Court in Hoffman set for itself the goal of creating a tort system that fairly and equitably allocated damages according to the degrees of fault. Therefore, a defendant should only be held responsible to the extent of his fault in the same way as…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reasearch Tote Case

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The “McDonalds Coffee Spill” is the most widely known tort case in the country (Liebeck v. McDonalds). The case was tried in Albuquerque, New Mexico in August 1993. When the case first hit the media circuit the news painted a picture of a clumsy old lady who spilled coffee all over herself while driving or riding in car, sued McDonalds, and was warded 2.7 million in punitive damages from a sympathic jury (O’Brien, Shafner, Stuart, Kelly & Morris, 1999). Further details of the case would surface 6 months to a year later with information that showed that this case was far more than trivial.…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many defendants in this case. First and foremost Dale, the loss prevention officer for Wal-Mart, is a defendant because he intentionally restrained Bob against his will and the restraint was unlawful. Dale also failed to follow company rules; Dale was supposed to watch a video that explained how to catch and deal with thieves but decided not to watch the video. The second defendant would be Dale’s supervisor. The supervisor recorded a pass on an exam that dale did not take. The exam Dale failed to write was based on the video that Dale did not watch. The third defendant would be Wal-Mart; Wal-Mart assumes liability because they could be at fault for not properly training staff. Bob would want to take action on Wal-Mart because they have the “deepest pockets” and would most likely be the only defendant with enough money to pay out compensation. Wal-Mart would be vicariously liable for Dales actions.…

    • 2865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Room Observation

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After watching the series of videos for the assignment this is what I have come up with this for the assignment. The case that we are observing took place in the United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, and Mr. Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, as well as, Jackson Welch and Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White. They are a group of four very impressive first year law students. The case is based on an incident that occurred when Mrs. White and her husband, Mr. White, were having dinner at O’Malley’s Tavern. Mr. Edward Hard, Mrs. White’s ex-fiancé was also at O’Malley’s Tavern that night. It was noted that he had consumed a considerable amount of alcohol. When Mrs. White and her husband left the tavern, Mr. Hard stumbled out of the tavern behind them, got into his vehicle, hit several vehicles, and chased the Whites’ out of the parking lot. Within roughly a half of a mile, he drove into the side of their car, killing Mr. White and injuring Mrs. White. The plaintiff Mrs. White believes that O’Malley’s Tavern is also partially responsible and should have intervened with Mr. Hard and not allowed him to leave intoxicated. The defendants are seeking a summary judgment which is a procedural device used during civil litigation to promptly and expeditiously resolve a case without a trail. They are claiming that there is not sufficient evidence to support that the bartender saw any visual signs of intoxication from Mr. Hart. However the plaintiff Debbie White is requesting the court to deny the defendants request for summary judgment. This would mean that O’Malley’s Tavern could not be held subject to any legal responsibility for Mr. Hards actions. The plaintiff is claiming that there is…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tylenol Crisis

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Develop a scenario describing a crisis situation. Possible topics for your scenario include school violence, workplace violence, terrorist attack, sexual assault, or natural disasters. Your scenario must include sufficient breadth and depth in terms of the details surrounding the incident you have chosen, to include:…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the above-mentioned case, the client is suing the counseling agency because he was physically assaulted by one of its employees. Wilbur, the plaintiff is suing XYZ counseling Agency (the defendant) because an employee called Chuck physically assaulted him during an anger management session; he holds the company responsible for the employee’s action.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The Chung family immigrated to the United States in 1992 and opened various dry cleaning businesses, including Custom Cleaners in 2000. From October 1999 until May 2005, Mr. Pearson patronized Custom Cleaners on numerous occasions. In July 2002, Mr. Pearson brought in a pair of pants for cleaning or alterations, which went missing. The Chungs agreed to compensate Mr. Pearson for the loss of the pants at a value of $150. Mr. Pearson continued to patronize Custom Cleaners, even after the Chungs requested that he not, until May 3, 2005, when Mr. Pearson brought in numerous suits for alterations. The last items to be brought in for alterations was a Hickey Freeman suit, which was blue and burgundy pinstripe, and a…

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the United States justice system, a tort is best defined as an injury or loss that was committed deliberately or negligently by a single person or an entity (Crane). The history of tort law can be traced back to the initial trespass of property or person, but it was not until the 18th century that the distinction between intentional and unintentional acts was made (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). In recent years, tort law has become the center of scrutiny through the increase in tort costs, insurance liability costs, and the number of frivolous lawsuits made. This scrutiny has lead to the creation of tort reform. Tort reform is a movement to reshape the way consumers can access the courts by restricting their right to sue and limiting the award that could be received (Crane). The upbringing of this reform has also brought to the table two clear and divided groups and their opinions of tort reform; the advocates of tort reform and the opposition.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    contract neglicence

    • 4053 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The plaintiff, an apprentice employed in the defendants' apprentice training school, was seriously injured by a practical joke played upon him by two fellow-apprentices. The Court of Appeal held the defendants not liable to the plaintiff in negligence, because his injury had occurred through an act of wilful misbehaviour which the defendants could not reasonably have foreseen.…

    • 4053 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays