Preview

Tort Reform In Texas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
255 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Reform In Texas
Before 1975 Texas was considered to be a complete quagmire of judicial mumbo-jumbo. The state’s system of justice allowed for laws to be applied arbitrarily. Enforcement of personal property rights and contracts varied depending on which local court had the case. Moreover, several counties that had bad reputations notwithstanding the court. Judicial outcomes often depended on which attorney was before which judge in which county. Equal enforcement of the state’s laws was simply not a certainty upon which a citizen could rely. In the early most attempts at tort reform in the State of Texas, a well-respected University of Texas Law School professor was asked to spearhead a commission and make recommendations on how to fix the those judicial inequalities. …show more content…
In order to stem the adverse effects of litigation on doctors, the Texas legislature passed its first tort reform law in 1977, establishing a cap on all medical malpractice damages except medical expenses. The Texas Supreme court, in 1988, found that they felt caps violated the Texas Constitution. Specifically the provision called “Open Courts”. This provision stipulates that only the courts shall be open to the public. Therefore, that first attempt at tort reform was pushed back again, and so from 1978 until 2003 the State of Texas was in a constant battle for tort reform in that state until in 2003 when, then governor, Rick Perry declared tort reform a State imperative and Medical Malpractice Act and Reform of 2003 was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court: Texas Court of Appeals, Twelfth District on appeal from the 402nd District Court Wood County…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In accordance with the Tennessee Medical Malpractice Act, on April 11, 2011, counsel for Mrs. Christine Stevens the spouse of Steven Stevens, formally notified Hickman Community Hospital and Dr. Whitaker of the impending malpractice allegations in their care and treatment of Mark Stevens (FindLaw, 2013). The formal notice was also accompanied by a medical record release form allowing Mrs. Stevens legal counsel to obtain Mark Stevens medical records, however, the medical record request for was non complaint with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), form failed to denote key information (FindLaw, 2013) . On September…

    • 1674 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Assignment

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. What effect did the United States Supreme Court’s decision have on the Texas statute?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe the federal constitution could be improved if it was more in-depth as the Texas constitution. I agree that both framers of the constitution wanted limited government; however, it looks like Texas has done a better job with their constitution.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Betts was indicted for robbery in a Maryland state court. On arraignment, he told the trial judge of his lack of funds to hire a lawyer and asked the court to appoint one for him. Betts was advised that is was not the practice in the county for indigent defendants except in murder and rape cases. He was founded guilty by the judge, sitting without jury, and was sentenced to 8 years in prison. Betts argued that he had been denied the right to assistance of counsel in violations of the 14th Amendments. Betts was denied any relief, and on review this Court let the lower court-ruling…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Governor Rick Perry

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Texas economy is performing well in the current global economic crisis, thanks to a focused effort to keep taxes low, regulations predictable and legal system fair. Gov. Perry led the effort to reform the legal system, signing into law a series of lawsuit reforms designed to stem the flow of frivolous lawsuits through Texas courts. As a result, employers can devote their resources to…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort law

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court concluded that there was enough evidence to establish intentional…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicially, the contrasts between federal government and state government could not be starker. The federal judiciary is simple and orderly, with three levels of courts – district courts, appeals courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court, the final word on all statutory and constitutional matters. All federal judges are appointed, not elected, and Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, with the specific intent of removing the judiciary from the pressures of electoral politics, allowing protection of minority interests in a government system designed to allow majority rule. In contrast, the Texas judiciary is complicated and confusing. The Texas Constitution establishes six types of courts, some of which have concurrent or overlapping jurisdictions.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The state I have chosen to compare to Oklahoma’s judicial process, is my home state of Texas. Texas and Oklahoma have a long standing rivalry that gets fought on the gridiron between the two states leading football programs, the unbridled passion that these two states share is akin to a big and little brother affection. The judicial process of these two states might very well be night and day of each other, but it works for the individual states because of the logistics and each states constitution, which is sacred to each state in its own right. I will conduct this comparison by starting with the highest court and working my way down to the smallest, with a comparison of what is the same and different.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas constitution.

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The framers of the Texas Constitution failed to anticipate that the limitations they imposed on governmental institutions would ultimately allow major economic interests within the state to dominate the policy-making process, often to the detriment of the lower socioeconomic groups. What the delegates to the Texas Constitutional Convention of 1875 regarded as the strengths of the constitution--fragmented authority, detailed limitations on the power of governmental institutions, and decentralization--have served to limit the ability of state and local governments to adapt effectively to economic and demographic changes. The perceived solutions to many of the problems of 1875 have compounded the problems of state and local governments in the 2000s.…

    • 547 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion Questions

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Phillips, T. U.S. Supreme Court of Appeals, the Second District of Texas. (2003). Reese v. fort worth osteopathic hospital inc. (02-1061). Retrieved from THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS website: http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first branch of the State Court of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court. This court according to the website for Supreme Court Laws (2017), the Texas Supreme Court “hears and administers decisions concerning civil cases.” According to Nolo.com (2017), a civil case is a “noncriminal lawsuit, usually involving private property rights. For example, lawsuits involving breach of contract, probate, divorce, negligence, and copyright violations are just a few of the…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal Jurisdiction

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will discuss a case involving Henry, a resident of Nevada, who sued Adam, a resident of Utah in the Federal Court in California. Henry sought $60,000 damages for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident that occurred in Los Angeles, California. I will answer the following questions about this case. Does the Federal Court have jurisdiction? What rules of procedure will the court use? Why? And what rules of substantive law will the court use? One of the most essential questions of law is whether a given court has jurisdiction to preside over a given case. Jurisdiction means the power to hear a case. Many courts have limited jurisdictions or limited powers, meaning they can only hear certain types of cases. “An example of this type of limited power is “municipal courts that are limited to city’s residents” (Morgan et al., 2010, p. 29). Any court owns jurisdiction over matters only to the degree granted to it by the Constitution, or legislation of the authority on behalf of which it functions. The question of whether a given court has the power to determine a jurisdictional question is itself, in my opinion a jurisdictional question.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As specialized courts continue to progress, Quinn (2009) stated that it is important that policymakers consider all voices, agnostics, and critics as they are all working to improve the courts (As cited in Cole and Getz, 2013). The material has clearly indicated that oftentimes policymakers have continued to overlook the issues mentioned above, which is quite problematic. It is crucial that individuals in such positions do not continue to poor economic resources into these courts without future experimentation, as the results have varied over the years. If one truly hopes to avoid repeating history and mistakes, our decisions must be fueled by more informed, balanced, and thoughtful discourse than what we are currently…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays