Tort Law Case Study Essay

Good Essays
Case 1 In the case at Gigantic State University, students that were a part of the SFT committed several careless acts. Within this particular case there was a definite crime that was committed because both Prudence’s physical and mental integrity was harmed. Not only could this case be classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek, pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible, or “liable,” for those injuries. According to the case, Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed …show more content…
This tort is classified as trespass to realty under four circumstances, one being when a person intentionally stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart (Kubasek, pg. 115). Analyzing the case it is clear that Chandler had asked the members to leave. However, the students did not obey which makes them have the possibility of being accused of trespass. Not only is a trespasser on someone’s personal property but, the trespasser is liable for damages she or he might cause as well (Kubasek, pg. 115). Since Steel and the other members used the properties book case and used it to break down Chandler’s door all of them are liable for the damages caused to both the door and the bookcase. Negligent torts involve failure to exercise reasonable care to protect another’s person or property (Kubasek, pg. 117). When comparing that definition to this case it is clear that negligence does not correspond with the elements of this case. In conclusion with the evidence involved it can be understood that Chandler had not control over this situation and had no way of knowing how to prevent this from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An intentional tort is a person deliberately causing harm or loss to another person. Examples are trespassing, causing a nuisance and defaming are intentional torts.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: LexisNexis, (2012). Part a. intentional torts and privileges chapter 1 intentional interferences with persons or property. Retrieved from website: http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/torts/index.asp…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tort Reform

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the United States justice system, a tort is best defined as an injury or loss that was committed deliberately or negligently by a single person or an entity (Crane). The history of tort law can be traced back to the initial trespass of property or person, but it was not until the 18th century that the distinction between intentional and unintentional acts was made (Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia). In recent years, tort law has become the center of scrutiny through the increase in tort costs, insurance liability costs, and the number of frivolous lawsuits made. This scrutiny has lead to the creation of tort reform. Tort reform is a movement to reshape the way consumers can access the courts by restricting their right to sue and limiting the award that could be received (Crane). The upbringing of this reform has also brought to the table two clear and divided groups and their opinions of tort reform; the advocates of tort reform and the opposition.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Connie Spears, whom had with a history of blood clots, arrived at Christus Santa Rosa Hospital’s emergency room of Texas in 2010 with unbearable leg discomfort. She was diagnosed with something minor and went home only to find herself in agonizing pain few days later. Emergency personnel escorted her to another hospital and found a massive blood clot and tissue damage. The doctors surgically removed both legs in order to save her life.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort law

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court concluded that there was enough evidence to establish intentional…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tort Law

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Smiley, a buyer for Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique, in order to find out what latest lines they were carrying. He was recognized by Maldini, the manager of Boulevard Boutique, who called the store detective, Rocco, and ordered him to “keep an eye” on Smiley while he, Maldini, called the police.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If the defendant has duty of care to the plaintiff and breaches his duty of care, as long as it can be proved that the defendant’s careless conduct causes damage, injury or loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable, the defendant will be liable to negligence. The following shows why ABC ltd is negligent and therefore liable to Johnny and Kenneth.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    contract neglicence

    • 4053 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The plaintiff, an apprentice employed in the defendants' apprentice training school, was seriously injured by a practical joke played upon him by two fellow-apprentices. The Court of Appeal held the defendants not liable to the plaintiff in negligence, because his injury had occurred through an act of wilful misbehaviour which the defendants could not reasonably have foreseen.…

    • 4053 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TORTS Final Exam Outline

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages

    • In order to determine if a child is behaving negligently, a child must conform to what a reasonable person of like, age, intelligence, and experience under like circumstances.…

    • 4593 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jacobsen vs Nike

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tort Law - Law of Negligence: It involves inadvertent or unintentionally careless conduct causing injury or damage to another person or his property. Four required elements or ingredients must be established by the plaintiff to succeed in a negligence action. Failure to establish any one of these four will lead to dismissal of the plaintiff’s action.1…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two different types of torts intentional torts and negligence. An intentional tort is a harm that a person desires or intends to bring about; as opposed to harms that are a result of carelessness. Intentional torts are as follows: 1) assault, 2) battery, 3) false imprisonment, 4) intentional infliction of emotional distress, 5) trespass to land, 6) trespass to chattels, and 7) conversion.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Field Interview

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort liability – lawsuits may result from the harm/damage you cause to other persons or property…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid injuring others or the property belonging to others. This would be if somebody does not exercise the amount of care that a reasonable careful person would use under the circumstances or somebody does something that a reasonably careful person would not do under the circumstances. Fault is essential in a negligence tort and is determined by basic elements. In negligence action there are four elements that play a large determining role. The four elements include duty of care, breach of duty by the tortfeasor, causation of injury to the victim and damages to the victim. The elements of negligence action work together in tort law to determine the level of negligence of the tortfeasor. The first element is the legal duty to conform to a certain standard of conduct in order to protect other from unreasonable risk of harm. The second element is the breach of duty by the tortfeasor failing to conform to a certain standard of conduct. The third element is the causation of injury and establishing a casual connection between the conduct and the injury, which comes in two components, actual cause or proximate cause. The final element of negligence action is damages to the victim being actual damages. This element is proving that a monetary figure can be attached to the negligence claim. The damages can come as compensatory damage, punitive damages, or damages attributable to actual loss of physical property. With all these elements in place fault is irrelevant.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays