Tort Law

Satisfactory Essays
PARTICIPATION ASSIGNMENT
JS 230-020
CHAPTER 7: TORT LAW
CASE PROBLEMS

1. Smiley, a buyer for Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique, in order to find out what latest lines they were carrying. He was recognized by Maldini, the manager of Boulevard Boutique, who called the store detective, Rocco, and ordered him to “keep an eye” on Smiley while he, Maldini, called the police.

Maldini called the police and informed them he had a “suspected shoplifter” on the premises. Smiley did not attempt to leave before the police arrived, assuming that Rocco would prevent him from doing so if he tried.

Smiley accompanied the police officers to the police station where they accepted his explanation as to why he was in the store and released him.

Question: What claim might Smiley have against Boulevard, Maldini or Rocco?
Answer: order to answer these questions there are a few tort liability issues that need to be discussed. The first issue is false imprisonment. “False imprisonment is the intentional confinement of another person within fixed boundaries without lawful justification.” (Kerr, 19) In this case, Smiley could have left the store, but was led to believe that Rocco would stop him if he tried. There was no physical restraint in this situation and no justification on suspicion of shoplifting; however, the detention was psychological. Smiley believed that Rocco would physically restrain him if he tried to leave the store. If this tort was brought in court, Rocco could use the defence of legal authority. “The defence of legal authority is raised where the defendant claims that a statutory provision authorizes the conduct that would otherwise constitute a tort.” (Kerr, 29) Since Rocco is considered a private citizen and not a police officer, he can only make an arrest if a crime is actually being committed at the time. Rocco believed that Smiley was committing a crime because he was informed so by Maldini. In this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Case Analysis

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Smiley, a buyer from Carrefour Fashions, entered the store of a rival firm, Boulevard Boutique. The reason for his visit was to find out about the latest lines that Boulevard was carrying. Once Smiley entered the store he was recognized by Maldini, the store manager of Boulevard, who immediately called the store detective and told him to keep an eye on Smiley. Maldini then called the police, notifying them that he had a shoplifter in the store. Smiley never tried to leave, believing that Rocco, the store detective, would not permit him to do so. Once the police took Smiley to the station he explained the situation and was released.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intentional Torts

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case it is considered defense of persons in which is a legal justification for assault, battery and false imprisonment. Assault is someone that intentionally puts another in fear and battery is when someone using force against another person. False imprisonment is someone that is holding another person down against their will. The reason it is considered defense of persons because Leroy was using reasonable force by protecting Jane the third person from injury where John threatened by an attacking force.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case at Gigantic State University, students that were a part of the SFT committed several careless acts. Within this particular case there was a definite crime that was committed because both Prudence’s physical and mental integrity was harmed. Not only could this case be classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek, pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible, or “liable,” for those injuries. According to the case, Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many defendants in this case. First and foremost Dale, the loss prevention officer for Wal-Mart, is a defendant because he intentionally restrained Bob against his will and the restraint was unlawful. Dale also failed to follow company rules; Dale was supposed to watch a video that explained how to catch and deal with thieves but decided not to watch the video. The second defendant would be Dale’s supervisor. The supervisor recorded a pass on an exam that dale did not take. The exam Dale failed to write was based on the video that Dale did not watch. The third defendant would be Wal-Mart; Wal-Mart assumes liability because they could be at fault for not properly training staff. Bob would want to take action on Wal-Mart because they have the “deepest pockets” and would most likely be the only defendant with enough money to pay out compensation. Wal-Mart would be vicariously liable for Dales actions.…

    • 2865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort law

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3) How were the elements of intentional infliction of emotional distress applied to that case? In other words, explain why the court concluded that there was enough evidence to establish intentional…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Monster

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some people, however, would argue that Steve Harmon is guilty because, he was at the drugstore the day of the robbery. For example, in the novel Monster, by Walter Dean Myers wrote, “Anybody can walk into a drugstore and look around… I walked into a drugstore to look for some mints, and then I walked out.”…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It might be argued that there was no agreement between Gimbels and DiDomenico. It also might be argued that DiDomenico would be acting on behalf of Gimbels and that he had the approval of Gimbels to oversee and direct the manner in which his surveillance was to be conducted. The case states that DiDomenico had followed Mapp into Gimbels when he was actually working for J.C. Penneys. It also does not state that he was invited by Gimbels to assist in the pursuit. Only that he remained there without invitation and at his own instance. His assistance was neither requested nor sought by Gimbels or by anyone on its behalf. So it appears that DiDomenico was acting on his own behalf and not as an agent or employee of Gimbels when he chased Mapp through the parking area and apprehended him in the lower parking area. There is no evidence for the belief that there was an agreement of between Gimbels and J.C. Penney for assistance. Nor was there any evidence that the security service of one store was authorized to provide security service to the other store when apprehending shoplifters.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What did Woolley do to show his acceptance of the terms of employment offered to him?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacco and vanzetti

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 15, 1920, a paymaster for a shoe company in Braintree, Massachusetts, and his guard were shot to death by two men who escaped with $15,776.51. Witnesses reported that both of these men were Italian’s. Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were with two other men while they went to a garage to claim a car that local police connected with the crime. The police then arrested them, due to their being “suspicious characters.” This became one of the most controversial cases in American history.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zevs's Graffiti Style

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Why is the Chanel logo drawn on the wall of an ‘A-grade office building’ where no Chanel store can be found? Why is he arrested? What kind of harm has he done?…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Im not scared essay

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the poverty in the town of Acqua traverse, the small hamlet in southern Italy where the story is set, the adults were forced into desperate measures to provide for their families. They resorted to a quick way to make money by kidnapping a boy named Filippo and holding him for ransom. He is held in a dark damp hole for weeks on end. This shows how cruel and inhumane people can be in dire situations. One of the worst examples comes from Pino, one of the leaders from the kidnapping group, or the “…bogeyman. By day he was good, but at night he was bad.” He threatens to cut off Filippo’s ears when watching the plea by the boy’s mother showing how cruel he has become.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tort Law

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If the defendant has duty of care to the plaintiff and breaches his duty of care, as long as it can be proved that the defendant’s careless conduct causes damage, injury or loss to the plaintiff while the damages are foreseeable, the defendant will be liable to negligence. The following shows why ABC ltd is negligent and therefore liable to Johnny and Kenneth.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief of Terry v

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At approximately 2:30 in the afternoon, while patrolling a downtown beat in plain clothes, Detective McFadden observed two men (later identified as Terry and Chilton) standing on a street corner. The two men walked back and forth an identical route a total of 24 times, pausing to stare inside a store window. After the completion of walking the route, the two men would meet on the corner; on several occasions the two men were joined by a third man (Katz), who left very quickly. Detective McFadden had specifically worked this downtown beat for 30 years concentrating on shoplifters, pickpocketers and suspected the men were going to hold up the store. Detective McFadden approached the three men and asked them for their names. The men mumbled something and Detective McFadden spun Terry around, patted down the outside of his clothing and found a pistol. Detective McFadden was unable to remove the pistol and ordered all three men in the store, to stand against a wall with their hands up. Once in the store the Detective removed Terry’s overcoat and secured the firearm. The Detective performed the same pat down on Chilton and Katz, neither time putting his hands under the outer garments of the suspects, until he felt a gun and at which time he was removing the gun for his and others safety. Detective McFadden seized and removed a revolver from the outer garment of Chilton.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Odyssey vs. Watchmen

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    suspicious about a note to go to Jacobiʼs apartment. He walked right into the copsʼ…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While on patrol, I observed a black male trespassing behind the peanut warehouse on 111 Youngblood Street. I identified the subject as Jimmy Smiley. Dispatch advised that Smiley had three warrants with our agency. Smiley was placed under arrest and transported to the Troy City Jail where he was…

    • 50 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics