Tort Assignment 1

Powerful Essays
Torts Assignment 2011 Semester 2

Fred v Ivan- Battery
Battery is committed when there is an intentional, direct, and unlawful contact or without consent to another’s person. Ivan intentionally made unlawful contact with Fred when he thrust his hands into Fred’s pocket. It was apparent that although the contact was with his pants’ pocket rather than directly to the body, the contact did involve some element of forces and that ‘the least touching of another in anger is battery’. Hence, the element of intent and direct impact are satisfied. Furthermore, Ivan’s contact was plainly beyond “permitted” contacts, and against the will of Fred. Notwithstanding that Fred may have provoked Ivan by his behaviour towards Ivan’s fiancée, however, this is not a defence to intentional wrong doing tort and there is not any reasonable ground for defence of the person of another. Therefore, it would be found that Ivan is liable for battery. There was no actual damage suffered by Fred, hence Fred can only claim for nominal damages.
Ivan v the parking attendant – negligent trespass for battery
A negligent battery is committed when there is a negligent, direct, and unlawful contact or without consent to another’s person. Prima facie, the injury suffered by Ivan was a direct injury negligently conflicted through the carelessness and negligence of the parking attendant. It would be reasonably foreseeable that someone might be standing under the shutter door. However, there has not been any precedent to support the view of negligent battery, or the interrelationship of fault and trespass. In my view, as long as the elements of negligent trespass are satisfied, the parking attendant would be liable for negligent battery and Ivan might claim for compensatory damage to compensate his medical bill and economic loss.
Assault
Ivan v Fred
Assault is the intentional creation of an apprehension of an immediate physical violence or unlawful contact. Fred subjectively intended to create an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    1. Can Mr. McPhillen be held liable for assault, battery and false imprisonment when he came to the defense of someone?…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Battery- intentional physical contact harmful or offensive to another person: the completion of an assault…

    • 1189 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Garton will likely be liable for battery because he intentionally blew smoke in Martin Trout’s face. In general, battery is defined as touching with the intent to harmfully or offensively contact another person. In this case, Mr. Garton’s actions were purposeful and showed intent. Also, Mr. Garton’s actions were offensive because smoke is an unpleasant substance. Therefore, the issue here is whether blowing smoke in Mr. Trout’s face is considered touching. Mr. Garton’s actions will likely be considered touching.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nominate Delicts

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages

    3) “indirect assault” - the affront or insult element predominates, occurs where indirect contact between the parties had resulted in “the person being affronted, or put in a state of alarm, or physically hurt”.…

    • 4283 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simple Assault & Battery - In Florida, an assault is intentional threats, words, or actions that cause a person to fear impending violence.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case at Gigantic State University, students that were a part of the SFT committed several careless acts. Within this particular case there was a definite crime that was committed because both Prudence’s physical and mental integrity was harmed. Not only could this case be classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek, pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible, or “liable,” for those injuries. According to the case, Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hcr Week 8 Legal Terms

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assault: an attempt or threat to do bodily harm to someone that is against the law like not giving a person their required medication or placing a patient in restraints without legal right to…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The appellant, Mr. Sprod who was acting drunk and assaulting inside a pizza shop, prompted the owner of the shop to call security guards from the respondent, Public Relations Oriented Security Ptd Ltd. The assault occurred after the appellant ignore the guard’s warning. The court of appeal found that the assault was ‘incidental’ to the employment of the security guards and there is a connection between the unauthorized acts of the guards and the acts with their employer. In the end, the court of appeal held that the assault should be regarded as within the scope of their employment, thus, vicarious liability was apply to the respondent and the appeal was upheld.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Guzha

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    axtor 19 the court gave examples of where a driver of a vehicle could not be said to be to doing the act of driving voluntarily. These included where a driver lost control of his vehicle because he was stung a swarm of bees, or if he was struck on the head by a stone or had a heart attack while driving. Other examples of an involuntary act include where the defendant hits another person because of a reflex action or a muscle spasm. If another is where one person pushes a second person, causing them to harm into third person. In this situation the act of second person who has been pushed is involuntary. Even though has hit the third person, he has not committed the actus reus for any assault offence. This happened in the case of Mitchell 1983 ( see section 8.1.3) of course, the original ‘pusher’ can be liable.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    litigation assignment 5

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Re: Could a complaint be dismissed due to failure to state claim upon relief in the state of North Carolina…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Memo

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The relevant behavior for the offense of assault by means of a dangerous weapon is an outward demonstration of force, and requires only apparent ability to injure, which, of necessity encompasses the particular use that the defendant made of the object. M.G.L.A. c. 265, § 15B(b).…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Battery: the intentional touching of another person in a way that is unwanted or offensive…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Litigation Assignment

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer: Federal Constitution is the most binding since it will override a conflict of the state constitution, Any powers not delegated by the federal constitution is reserved to the states. Federal Legislation is next since it deals with constitutional law and could override the state law if a conflict exists in the two laws. Federal law affects all states where state law is confined to each state only. Next is the States constitution as it deals with each particular state, although if there is a conflict with federal statutes, federal will override state. Last is the state legislation that are laws written by each independent state.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Torts Assignment 3

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dan, Joey and Mike are teenagers out for a walk on Longmeadow Lane when they spot a bright and inviting Halloween display on the Jones’ property. Without meaning to damage anything, they decide to walk across the lawn to get a closer look.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brill Torts Outline

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages

    i. For battery, the defendant must have acted with the intent to cause a harmful or offensive touching to plaintiff or some logical extension of plaintiff 's person.…

    • 12012 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics