Preview

Tom Mullen's Argue Of Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tom Mullen's Argue Of Civil Disobedience
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it is exercising the rights of it’s citizens as well as proving that the government is not always correct, and the biggest changes normally come about from civil disobedience. Civil disobedience has been used to speak against the United States government when it showed that those in power wouldn’t change for the better.
Civil disobedience was not well known for the abolition of slaves. David Thoreau called for it in “Civil Disobedience,” written in 1849, claiming that the government showed faulty in handling slavery. Thoreau claimed “the government itself… is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it,” (Thoreau par 1). Government officials
…show more content…
History has shown that given time, this peaceful disobedience was appreciated in its own way. In Tom Mullen’s article, “Muhammad Ali’s Anti-War Stand Was Civil Disobedience, Not Draft Dodging,” written in 2016, he explains that Ali’s disobedience was very controversial, and sometimes still is. Many believed the Vietnam War was a war the United States should never have fought. Ali also saw this, claiming that the Vietcong was not his enemy, but the white people in America. He believed in “non-aggression” which was rooted from his religion and this “non-aggression” fueled his peaceful disobedience, his refusal to be drafted. “Ali never dodged the draft; he opposed it, accepting the legal consequences without any attempt to evade them,” (Mullen par 2). Many believed the war was necessary, which is why Ali had been “reviled by a large portion of the American public,” for not doing his duty as a citizen (Mullen par 5). Ali had lost during this battle of the draft, including his boxing title. These challenges did not deter him. The draft was deemed wrong, and those like Ali that spoke so publicly against it showed how wrong it truly was. The draft was a blockage of a free society, just as slavery was, and the United States could not truly consider itself a free society if it were to force its citizens to fight in a war they didn’t believe in. Ali’s disobedience has shown that, although controversial, defying the government through civil disobedience can positively impact the free society of the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Muhammad Ali claimed that he was not going to be inducted into the United States Army because he “...ain’t got no quarrel with them Vietcong”, he was convicted of draft evasion, fined $10,000 and sentenced to five years in prison. Muhammad Ali gained his fighting licence back in 1970 and in 1971 and the conviction was appealed. His actions and bravery gave people courage to fight for what they believed in, which lead to people questioning the drafting process and helped start the anti-slavery movement. Muhammad Ali took a stand against the Supreme Court and showed them that all religious beliefs should be respected and considered before conviction.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The text states "Prior to his defiance of the draft,he was funny,showboating boxer who belonged to an eccentric. religion" . The stance Ali took on Vietnam has, of course, been vindicated by history. The injustice of the war is no longer controversial among reasonable and sane people.During Muhammad Ali rich and complicated life, he did many things good and bad.But the finest thing he ever did was standing,in the face of fierce public condemnation,against a foolish and criminal war.Muhammad Ali stated in one of his interviews "why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go 10,000 miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on brown people in Vietnam while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs and denied simple human…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. for the first time for this essay, I realized what true civil disobedience was. Rev. King understood that his…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Young men fight and die for their country in every single war, and Vietnam was no different. However, U.S. forces during the Vietnam War, on average, were the youngest in American history. In previous wars many men in their twenties were drafted for military service, and men of that age and older would often volunteer. During the Vietnam War most of the volunteers and draftees were teenagers; the average age was nineteen. In World War II, the average American soldier was twenty-six years old. At the age of eighteen young men could join or be drafted into the army. At seventeen, with the consent of a guardian, boys could enlist in the Marine Corps. At the beginning of the war, hundreds of seventeen year old marines served in Vietnam. However, in November 1965, the Pentagon ordered that all American troops must be eighteen before being deployed in the war zone. The soldiers sent off to Vietnam can be divided into three categories: one-third draftees, one-third draft-motivated volunteers, and one-third true volunteers. As the war continued, the number of volunteers steadily declined. Almost half of the army troops were draftees, and in the combat units the portion was commonly as high as two-thirds; late in the war it was even higher. These were the majority of the people dying in the war, from 1966 to 1969, the percentage of draftees who died in the war doubled from 21 to 40. Those who could avoid the draft legally through deferments were the upper class, while those in the middle and lower class who didn’t want to fight in the war had to figure out ways to avoid the draft. Because the draft threatened middle and lower class males between the ages of 18 to 35, they united together through protests to oppose the draft by burning draft cards.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ali refused to be drafted into the military on June 20, 1967. He was convicted due to his refusal This caused Ali to be sentenced to five years in prison and with a fine of $10,000, Ali was also banned from boxing for three years.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ali claimed he could not fight in the Vietnam war on grounds of his religious…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” This quote by Thomas Jefferson shows that even though there are risks, stand up for what is right and just. The law is not always the right thing and people who disagree are considered, Civilly disobedient. Civil disobedience is standing up for what is right even if it’s the law. Two men who took a stand for their right is Martin Luther King Jr. and David Thoreau. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail” is about MLK Jr.’s experience with civil disobedience. MLK Jr. himself, committed an act of civil disobedience and stood up for what was right. As did David Thoreau in “From Civil Disobedience”. These men knew the law and the consequences that would follow, but they understood what would benefit from their act of disobedience.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience it’s impossible to see where we would be today. The first act of civil disobedience was the Boston Tea Party. On December, 16, 1773 the group Sons of Liberty created a political demonstration against the Tea Act. The Tea Act was an unfair tax used to make us pay for their war. This is one of many times we were treated differently and unfairly than citizens living in Britain. The act of throwing tea into the harbor ignited tension for more people to protest and overthrow the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This in my opinion was peaceful resistance because again he was speaking out on what he believes in, knowing the consequences that would likely be coming his way. An act I would agree would be negative to the society related to draft dodging would be ripping up the draft cards to avoid going being picked to go to war. This to me would be more likely to be negative and cause tension rather than Muhammad Ali disagreeing with the draft. An example of negative resistance I would say would be some Americans nervous to be around Muslim people. Due to terrorist attacks that have happened in the…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to law positively impacts society. Humans have a lengthy, detailed history of not always being able to see what is right or moral in certain circumstances, and unfortunately, humans are who create laws. One infamous example of unjust laws would be the Jim Crow laws of the south. Today, it is clear as day that discrimination and racism is unconstitutional, but why was it so hard to see that during that time period.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The draft resisters answered “no” to two specific questions on the loyalty questionnaires: question #27 and question #28. Question #27 asked, “Are you willing to serve in the armed forces of the United States on combat duty, wherever ordered?” Question #28 asked “Will you swear unqualified allegiance to the United States of America and faithfully defend the United States from any or all attack by foreign or domestic forces, and forswear any form of allegiance or obedience to the Japanese emperor, or other foreign government, power or…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Disobedience is a very controversial topic due to the fact that history represents such a wide range of extremities of this ideology. Disobedience can be perceived in many different ways and it can either help or destroy the structure of society. An example of disobedience in society that has proved very successful in the past is civil disobedience. Throughout history, civil disobedience has made a huge impact on the U.S. government and is responsible for several popular social reforms. Many of the world’s most inspirational leaders used civil disobedience to reconstruct society and develop remarkable social change. Examples of these leaders include Ghandi, Martin Luther King Jr., Susan B. Anthony, and Rosa Parks. These people were able to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience was written by Henry David Thoreau. The Letter From A Birmingham Jail was written by Martin Luther King Jr. They both had similarities and differences. There were injustices that were done wrong to each of them by others in the society in which they both lived. The injustices and civil disobedience they incurred should never happen to anyone.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil disobedience has always been a debated and polar opinionated topic since the first days that it was presented. Whenever it comes to going against a law that is set in stone as something to abide by in a society, some controversial actions are going to follow. The person who played the role as somewhat of a backbone in this movement was Henry Thoreau. In 1849, when Henry Thoreau re-iterated the idea of civil disobedience to the people of American following the Mexican war, it was viewed by some as extremely controversial, some viewed it as treason, and then there were the followers that were completely accepting of it and felt it necessary. This is why, when the idea came of mixing this idea of civil disobedience that was already controversial, with the slavery and whether it should be used against the fugitive slave act, was a real catalyst for uproar and praise. The uproar clearly came from some people with high positions in the United States. Two advocates for the compromise of 1850 and the fugitive slave laws were two candidates for president of the United States, Franklin Pierce from the democratic party and Winfield Scott. Although Franklin Pierce, the eventual winner of the election, wasn't as candid about his beliefs regarding slavery, he was definitely opposed to civil disobedience against the fugitive slave laws. These supporters generally included northern democrats and southern Whigs. The opposition to the compromise of 1850 and the fugitive slave act consisted mainly of abolitionists of slavery at the time. The most powerful and effective users of their rights to civilly disobey usually came from the north mainly because they had the opportunity. The fugitive slave act caused citizens living in the north were required to return escaped slaves if they found them. If they were not to return the slaves, they were lawful to pay a $1,000 fine. Some abolitionists that did not abide these rules and rather than returning slaves,…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    majority and that “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority” (Thoreau 231) are…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays