Preview

Tok Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
643 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tok Essay
“The possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility”- Tanmay Dhanopia 11th C As we all know that possession of knowledge carries an ethical responsibility, sometimes both ethical responsibility and knowledge confuses us in making certain decisions. One fine morning I was sitting in my house’s balcony enjoying the lovely weather, I started reading a newspaper whose headline which was “the improvement in cosmetics by animal testing” attracted me as the whole article was providing details about all the tests which are being performed by cruel scientist on poor animals just to advance their cosmetic items, so that it succeeds in the market and earn them a lot of money. Our knowledge states that it is unethical to do tests on poor animals as it hurts them too if they experiment doesn’t succeed and might result in number of side effects which the animal has to bear by himself. But if we consider this situation with the scientist’s view we will get to know that he is doing it for the sake of millions of people who all will use the product in future. This might save millions of lives which might get lost if they don’t introduce the product in the market without testing it on the animals as the might be harmful or unstable which might result in various diseases. In the case of animals, they too have feelings and emotions and also feel the pain if the product results dangerous which the humans can’t feel because the animals can’t express their feelings as the animals can’t communicate with the human beings.

According to business firm like Reliance corporation, they consider profit as their main motive which their knowledge says to do so but their ethical responsibility is to pay their employees the right salary which they deserve by their hard work. The ethical responsibility also states that Reliance should provide facilities like better working conditions which would motivate their workers and make them work more efficiently as a result Reliance would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animals should have the right to decide if they want to collaborate in experiments. In Ed Young’s article, “Of Primates and Personhood”, he explains that, “the Great Ape Project demands a basic set of moral and legal rights for apes”. This quote informs us that apes should be more than just property. Some may argue that experimentation is beneficial to humans because it helps us decide what kinds of products are safe for human use. However, the experimentation on apes sometimes leads to their death.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Toulmin Essay

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Third Dugent states that meetings go better when you “forget about yourself entirely, forget about how you look, what you’re wearing, and how people…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article, “A Question of Ethics”, Jane Goodall argues that animal testing research is unethical and ineffective and people should be aware that there are other alternatives that are helpful in noticing diseases as the advanced medical technologies. She questions whether it is ethical or not to use animals as test subjects for new drugs and vaccines. She asserts that scientists should avoid conducting unnecessarily experiments on animals in order not to cause suffering for them. Moreover, Goodall indicates that if animal testing is the only way available to decrease human suffering, it would be ethical for scientists to do such tests. However, if there are alternative tests available, it would be unethical for scientists to depend on animal…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal rights are one of the most controversial issues today. There has been endless debate about whether or not animals have rights. Philosophers attempt to come up with the moral conclusions by taking in account the many different standpoints and presenting their related arguments. In his essay “The case of animal rights”, Tom Regan, a professor of philosophy at North Carolina State University, defends his view that the center of our moral concern should not bring the suffering on animal as well as treating animals in a certain way. In other words, we should treat animals as if they are our property. We should only use them to benefit us and hurting them is an action that is not morally justifiable. In addition, in his article “All Animal Are Equal”, Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher, has many points which show us that we have responsibilities to protect animal rights. Singer’s argument in his essay gives us a great support to the argument that Reagan trying to discuss in terms of morally equal. In contrast, “The case of the use of animals in biomedical research” by Carl Cohen, a philosophy professor at University of Michigan Medical School, although he agrees with Regan’s idea in terms of moral rights as well as practices that essentially involve harming animals are morally unjustified, he strongly supports for the use of animal in medical research, and scientific experiments to avoid risking human lives. “The case of animal rights”, “all animal are equal” and “The case of the use of animals in biomedical research” introduce to us a new thinking about treating animals.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The subject of animal testing for medical research has been a topic of argument for decades now. With valid points for either side of the argument, it is certainly understandable as to why this has yet to be settled. Some questions everyone is still faced with today are, is animal testing for medical purposes right and ethical? Which types of testing are ethical? What would modern medicine be like today if we had not used animals for medical testing in the first place? All of these questions present strong arguments when answered, and will be addressed throughout this paper. With modern medicine as advanced as it is today, many argue that medical testing on animals should be conducted to make medical advances, while others argue it should not be done; This paper will address and evaluate all of the pros and cons of each side of the argument from a Utilitarian and Kantian viewpoint, proving in the end that animal testing was and still is very necessary for medical purposes.…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Across the globe, animals of all varieties are being exploited for their flesh, fur and produce. How would you feel if your pets were subjected to such cruelty? Animals are poisoned, stabbed and crammed in cages to be tested on; medical research, educational purposes, drug and chemicals, and cosmetics and household products are some of the main reasons why they are put through such torture. Even though there may be some ‘valid’ reasons for conducting and carrying out such inhumane activities, too many people stand behind large companies and support their ‘valid’ reasons for doing so without having full awareness of what pain and suffering the animals are subjected to during the testing process.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals are unique creatures placed all around the world, each with their own genuine, exotic, and weird personalities. Unfortunately, every year, “scientists” use them to test potentially dangerous products that most people use in our everyday lives. Although scientists claim that there is no other way to test them, and that their work ethics are a necessity to keep the society safe, they are wrong. There are many other ways to test animals without harming them, and “scientists” should be using those ways with no problem. Animal testing is inhumane, cruel and unethical, and there are other, non-harmful ways to test.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine an animal’s feeling of panic and fear as it is about to be killed by a hunter or the isolation experienced as an animal sits in a laboratory, separated from its family and natural habitat, waiting to be harmed by harsh testing methods. Imagine the frightened state of a mother or father watching their innocent baby being captured. After considering the brutality towards animals in these scenarios, take into consideration the health benefits humans receive from different parts of these animals. Imagine health risks avoided through testing on animals first instead of on humans. Does human benefit justify the harm and killing of animals? Linda Hasselstrom’s essay “The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist” and Tom Regan’s “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” argue this question through analysis of the reason for killing animals, the method in which they are killed, and the morality of the killing of animals.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings…..who are we? Are we Gods or we are just the top of the food chain on Earth? Do we have rights to harm other nonhuman species? These and many other questions I have in my head when I see how cruel we are sometimes to each other and even harsher toward the other nonhuman beings. Personally, I treat animals with respect because I consider them to be reasonable creatures that are in many perspectives similar to us, human beings. I am confident that animals have emotions; they can feel pain and happiness like we do. As we can see this is not enough for us to consider them our “little brothers.” From ancient times, many animals are being used for satisfying human’s different needs, such as food, transportation, and materials. Nowadays, human beings use animals not only for abovementioned purposes, but also for cosmetics and medical experiments. All these experiments definitely cause harm to animals. Majority of human population believes that all these experiments are the required attribute for all pharmaceutical and cosmetics companies. They believe that these practices can prevent many people from suffering by testing all new medicine and cosmetic products on animals first. According to this I can say that animals’ sufferings caused by people became moral issue for our last generations. In my essay I will use the work of Peter Singer “All animals are Equal,” because his work covers most of the aspects that I agree with. The main purpose of this essay is to emphasize that nonhuman beings have many similarities with human beings and they need to have basis rights for life without pain. It means that human beings must understand that all species are equal…

    • 2429 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Argument

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many people that contest the utilization of animals for animal testing even though it is not an elementary concept. They present arguments that all animal research and testing should come to an end because it is wrong to treat animals like they are tools to obtain knowledge. They argue that alternative methods should be developed to end the practice of animal testing. An important piece of the open debate over every living creature's common sense entitlement fixates on the ethical position of a creature. The majority agree that animals have some ethical position and that is the reason it is wrong to mistreat pets or unnecessarily hurt different creatures. This alone speaks to a movement from a past view where creatures had no ethical position and treating a creature was more about keeping up human norms of nobility than honoring any fundamental freedoms of the creature. Today, the question has changed from whether creatures have a moral position to what rights accompany that position. Looking at this point of view, animals should have the same right as a human being, to live a free life without pain and suffering.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal testing is undoubtedly one of the most controversial issues in modern society. This practice began in the 19th century; animals were used to test dosing of certain drugs and chemicals. In the 1920’s, animals were also being used to test pesticides and food additives (Fano, 11). Today, animal testing is used to study everything from cosmetics to cancer. With such a wide range of opinions on animal rights and human priority, it is no wonder that this topic is so controversial. There are people who have an extreme view on the issue and are either completely pro or completely con. In my opinion, the issue of animal testing is far too complex for one simple answer; its morality lies somewhere in between the two poles. Animal testing is acceptable if it results in saving people’s lives. It is not acceptable, however, if it results in personal or cosmetic products that are far from vital to the human race.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    animal testing essay

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2nd and 4th century BCE animal testing began, they used live animals to test experiments on. Now, even to this day, we use animals to test cosmetics, medicines, drugs, and medical research. Many people have realized how cruel these acts are to the animals and have tried to stop them but to no avail. Humans who use these helpless creatures have yet to realize how wrong it is and that they have feelings and are hurting from all our injections and concoctions used on them for our own greed.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tok Essay

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “We see and understand things not as they are but as we are”, this claim shows how much our beliefs and experiences changes how we view the world. Our beliefs and experiences are what make us who “we are”, therefore this are what influence on our ways of knowing. Since the ways of knowing is what shapes our understanding of the world and views then we can see things as “we are”.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is time for society to realize that no one benefits from the suffering of animals used in expensive and useless experiments. Animals may not be able to speak like humans but it does not negate the fact that they are capable of suffering. The human species has taken the liberty of deciding what is valuable in the world, and therefore they prize themselves as the highest level of the food chain. The human species has used animals for transportation, food and companionship since the dawn of time. Animals are at the mercy of humans and sadly, they are also very trusting of humans. Humans abuse this trust and have subjected these defenseless animals to their exploratory experiments. The benefits of this exploratory research do not outweigh the suffering that these powerless animals have encountered since the beginning of time. Or do they? Is it not human nature to value life, the lives of children, loved ones, family and friends? Is it not the suffering of these individuals which should be avoided? Is it not these individuals that should be protected? While defenseless animals should be protected against humans, animal experimentation is necessary to continue advancing medicine because research produces important scientific developments which save lives.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays