Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

To what extent was USA alone in developing weapons of mass destruction in the WW2 period?

Powerful Essays
1320 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent was USA alone in developing weapons of mass destruction in the WW2 period?
The World War II period brought new technologies and weapons of mass destruction that created tensions between countries and competition for a nuclear arms race well into the 20th century. While many countries, notably Germany, the Soviet Union, and USA attempted to develop technology leading to weapons of mass destruction in the World War II period, the US was the only country that successfully built an atomic bomb before the end of the war. There was significant research conducted by scientists in a number of countries leading up to and throughout the war, but the Americans success at creating nuclear bombs, as well as the German and Soviet failures, were due to funding, organization, and counter-intelligence.
In the period leading up to and including World War II, there were a number of nations that were working on cutting edge research in nuclear physics in an attempt to develop weapons of mass destruction. In 1934, the Admiralty, a patent organization of the British Royal Navy, granted the first patent on the idea of chain reaction based on neutron bombardment to Leo Szilard, an Austro-Hungarian physicist who worked in the US (Sublette). Later that same year, French physicists Irene and Frederic Joilot-Curie and Italian physicist Enrico Fermi, also working in the US, independently confirmed that radioactivity could be produced in elements when they are bombarded by neutrons and alpha particles (Sublette). In 1938, Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, two German physicists, found the same results, and in 1939, Austrian/ British physicist Otto Robert Frisch confirmed these findings. A few short weeks later, on January 25, 1939, a team of American and European scientists, including Enrico Fermi and Niels Bohr, began experimenting with nuclear fission at Columbia University (Sublette). Within a few months of the American experiments, the Germans assembled their own small team of scientists, Georg Joos, Wilhelm Hanle, and Reinhold Mannkopff, to begin research into the applicability of nuclear fusion technology to create a bomb for military purposes (Sublette). These scientists, who formed the Uranverein (Uranium Club), began work at Georg-August University of Gottingen in May 1939 (Sublette). The Soviets also had scientists, such as Yakov Frenkel, Georgii Flerov, and Lev Rusinov, who were conducting theoretical research on fission at the Soviet Academy of Sciences, but they were not organized into research teams to explore the applicability of this theory (Sublette). While the scientists working on fission/ fusion research during this period consisted of a mix of Americans and Europeans, the US had a team composed of scientists of various nationalities, including Canadian, British, French, Italian, Austro-Hungarian, and even German (who fled before the war began), the Germans had only a small group of their own people. The Soviets were not as active in research in this period.
By the time World War II began, the American team of international scientists was becoming organized into a powerful research group that eventually became known as the “Manhattan Project”. Robert Oppeneheimer, a physicist from UC Berkeley, was appointed to lead the research development of an atomic bomb. The research and production of these weapons were conducted at dozens of sites across the US, Canada and the UK, and two kinds of bombs were developed: uranium and plutonium, later named Little Boy and Fat Man. These bombs were dropped in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki on August 9, 1945 to end World War II (Richard). The Americans were alone in their success of developing the first nuclear bombs, which can be attributed to a number of factors. First, the Manhattan project was a centralized research initiative conducted by an abundance of scientists from many countries who were devoted to the work. Secondly, the project was allocated large sums of money, along with unlimited manpower and resources, and unconditional government support. While the project began in 1939 with limited resources, by the time it was in full production in the early 1940s, it employed over 130,000 people and cost over $2 billion USD (approximately $25.8 billion USD today) (Richard). Finally, the US ran a parallel military operation called the “Alsos Mission”, in which American military personnel were charged with collecting intelligence relating to enemy nuclear activity. This meant that the Americans had inside information on the German nuclear research, seized their records on the front lines, and even brought German scientists who worked for the Nazis back to the US to work on the Manhattan Project after they were captured (Vincent). On the other hand, the German and Soviet nuclear bomb development projects were not successful for a number of related reasons. In Germany, though there were many scientists who were pursuing fission/ fusion research, many of them were working as academics in the United States before the war, or fled when war was imminent. Furthermore, many scientists were apprehended by the Allied forces and brought back to the US to work for the other side. Perhaps the biggest obstacle to the success of the German project came in January 1942, when it was decided that nuclear fission technology was not a feasible option to the end the war, and the Reich Research Council assumed responsibility of the project from the Heereswaffenamt (German Army Weapons Agency) (Mark). The project was then divided into 9 agencies and fragmented in terms of manpower and resources (Mark). The Soviets did not conduct their own intensive research on nuclear weapons development during this period, relying instead on spying carried out by the GRU (Soviet Military intelligence) who determined that the Americans were in fact working on a bomb. These spies infiltrated the Manhattan Project, and learned the extent of the US progress. While Stalin was aware of the Americans’ work, he was occupied with the military campaigns on the Eastern Front in the war, and unable to allocate resources to developing the nuclear capability to build a bomb. It was not until after the Americans dropped Little Boy and Fat Man in August 1945 that the Soviets aggressively expanded their nuclear program. They largely relied on research gathered by spying on the Americans (who knew to some extent that the Soviets had this information because of their own Alsos Mission), as well as information that the Soviet forces “requisitioned” of German research and scientists at the end of the war (Kojevnikov). The Americans were not alone in their pursuit of technology to create weapons of mass destruction, but they were alone in their success. While the Germans and the Soviets had scientists working on their own research in nuclear fission and fusion, the lack of resources and organization limited their chances of success. The Americans, on the other hand, were well-organized, well-funded, and had a large pool of talent from which to draw, as well as solid intelligence and counter-intelligence into their enemy’s progress. This information and collaboration with other nations allowed them to successfully complete and use two atomic bombs to end the war. These events, however, were not limited to the World War II period, as the Soviets began a quick expansion of their nuclear program, and developed their own weapons of mass destruction that would initiate a nuclear arms race between the US and USSR for decades to come. This arms race provided the foundation for the Cold War, which dominated global power and relations until close to the end of the 20th century.

Works Cited

Sublette, Carey. "The Nuclear Weapon Archive." - A Guide to Nuclear Weapons. 3 Jan. 2005. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. .

Kozhevnikov, A. B. Stalin 's Great Science: The times and Adventures of Soviet Physicists. London: Imperial College, 2004. Print.

Jones, Vincent C. Manhattan, the Army and the Atomic Bomb. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, U.S. Army, 1985. Print.

Rhodes, Richard. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986. Print.

Walker, Mark. German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power: 1939-1949. Cambridge U.a.: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1989. Print.

Cited: Sublette, Carey. "The Nuclear Weapon Archive." - A Guide to Nuclear Weapons. 3 Jan. 2005. Web. 10 Apr. 2012. . Kozhevnikov, A. B. Stalin 's Great Science: The times and Adventures of Soviet Physicists. London: Imperial College, 2004. Print. Jones, Vincent C. Manhattan, the Army and the Atomic Bomb. Washington, D.C.: Center of Military History, U.S. Army, 1985. Print. Rhodes, Richard. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986. Print. Walker, Mark. German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power: 1939-1949. Cambridge U.a.: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1989. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Hiroshima Research Paper

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    On August 6th, 1945, the world was forever changed when the world’s first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. The attack was made as an attempt to end World War 2, and it succeeded at a devastating price. John Hersey’s Hiroshima depicts six different accounts of victims of the bomb. The journalistic novel tells how each of the people began their day, how they survived the explosion, the response, and where they were 40 years later. Each account is different, and they all represent the various ways that the bomb hurt the people. These six individual catastrophes illustrate the horrible effects of atomic bombs and how the use of them should not be even considered by any empathetic human being.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Manhattan Project the main focus was on the development of fission weapons but work on the hydrogen bomb was also taking place. In the study for the hydrogen bombs it was concluded that stars had to achieve their large output of energy from some kind of nuclear process. In the 1930’s Hans Bethe studied this release of energy. He suggested that the sun and other…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retrieved January 30, 2013, from DOW: http://www.dow.com/productsafety/finder/dgbe.htm UNSCEAR (2000). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiations. The general assembly with scientific annex. United Nation. New York, NY.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stimson, Henry L. "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb." Harper 's Magazine 1947: 96-107. Web. 7 Mar. 2013.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aviation and electronics grew in size and usefulness. The demands of the war not only generated new weapons but also new innovations in electronic intelligence and transportation. For example, radar and sonar was a new technology that became very useful during the war. Soldiers would watch the radar or sonar screen and send planes or ships to intercept oncoming enemies. Another major technological advancement that came as a result of World War II was the first atom bomb. A race took place against the Soviet Union called “The Arms Race” in which the U.S raced to create an atomic bomb in secret. Using newly discovered science, the United States underwent “The Manhattan Project”, that lead to the creation of a bomb that could cause devastation never seen before with any weapon (The 1940’s Science and Technology: Overview 2001). This bomb affected the U.S and the world forever. A weapon of this caliber caused many people to oppose it on moral grounds. Others thought it was necessary for protection. After the U.S dropped two on Japanese civilians, there was a lot of controversy. These bombs combined killed 109,000 instantly. The radiation killed another 200,000 by the end of the year. Other countries feared this power and scrambled to create atomic weapons of their own. To this day, countries attempt to have the most…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Truman Political Influence

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper will identify the political influences that contributed to President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. The reason this topic is important is because the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan during World War II has had a lasting impact on U.S. foreign policy. The information on the political influences affecting Truman’s decision will be from Truman by David McCullough; Code-Name Downfall by Thomas B. Allen and Norman Polmar; America’s Rise to World Power by Foster Rhea Dulles, and The Atomic Bomb and American Foreign Policy by Barton J. Bernstein, “Nuclear Non-Proliferation” by Lawrence Scheinman, “The Atomic Bomb” by Campbell Craig and Sergey Radchenko and Prompt and Utter Destruction by Samuel J. Walker.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The atom bomb was no great decision... It was merely another powerful weapon in the arsenal of righteousness” (President Harry Truman). Most people believe that World War II started in 1941 when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, in actuality it started on September 1, 1939 when Germany attacked Poland (Rosenberg).While World War II was a horrible and extremely deadly war, with roughly 56,125,262 people who died, that seemed to serve no purpose it brought with it many technological advancements that we still use today (Hitler Historical Museum, 1996-1999). World War II not only helped the world come up with…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The Decision to Drop the Bomb." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 17 Oct. 2014. <http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp>.…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the aftermath of World War II, the military research and development took two different courses. One of the courses was with the advancement of nuclear weapons and the other course was with the increasing capacity and improvement of conventional weapons. Now more than ever, nuclear scientists were now more in demand than ever before both in the United States and around the world…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1945 began as a year of increasing tensions between countries as the war extended onto its sixth year. Military groups of the various countries involved were now beginning to seriously consider the conclusion of the war in terms of how the global ceasefire would be carried out and frankly, who would win. After the defeat of the Axis Powers in Europe, the focus had been turned towards the war in Asia and the Pacific Regions in which the Allied Forces of Great Britain, Australia and the USA were in conflict with the Axis power of Japan and her partners. Following the urge to end the war, the ‘Big Three’ made up of the three leaders of the major Allied Forces; Churchill, Stalin and Truman met for what is known as the Potsdam Conference to discuss ‘post-war world’ and as a result, the Potsdam Declaration was written giving the Japanese an opportunity to surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction”. Despite this opportunity, the Japanese chose to ignore the warning, thus, the US decided to administer the use of their newly developed nuclear weapons and drop the atomic bombs on Japan with both hope and belief that the Japanese would be forced to surrender and thus, ending the war on American terms. At the time, there was massive speculation surrounding the attack. However, the USA had entirely justifiable reasons behind the attack; therefore, they should have dropped the bombs on Japan. Firstly, Japan had been given the opportunity to surrender on peaceful terms but refused due to military being in control of the nation. Secondly, the only alternative was an invasion on Japan; however this action would not end lightly with predictions of huge casualties on the Americans’ part. Furthermore, the Japanese surrendered within a week of the dropping of the bombs proving the effectiveness of the USA’s actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After World War II atomic research escalated into a frenzy. Many countries were trying to duplicate what America had done. The great arms race had begun. Although these countries knew the destructive power of the atom, they did not fully understand its more peace-full side, a side which helps us today with so much.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial issues of World War II is the debate on whether or not the United States should have used an atomic bomb against the Japanese. People who tend to oppose the use of the atomic bomb tend to ignore, or are ignorant, of the history of Japan during World War II. One factor to consider is the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in countries that Japan had conquered. Another aspect was the “never surrender” mentality of the Japanese military in the territories they controlled during World War II. The final point is the estimated number of casualties for both sides. Due to these factors, the U.S. should have dropped the bomb on Japan to save lives on both sides.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thesis states the petition made on July 4, 1945, to the president of the United States drafted by author Leo Szilard and cosigned by scientist of the atomic bomb committee to consider the consequences of using the atomic bomb. The organization and structure of the writing brings a strong message about the devastation an atomic bomb would do to any city in the hands of our Army, but ultimately by our Commander and Chief who has the power to use it (Szilard).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays