Preview

To What Extent Was the Chinese Revolution, 1927-1949, a Socialist Revolution as Defined by Marx?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was the Chinese Revolution, 1927-1949, a Socialist Revolution as Defined by Marx?
1. Introduction To what extent was the Chinese revolution, 1927-1949, a socialist revolution as defined by Marx? This investigation will be comparing classical Marxist doctrine with Mao Zedong thought and the Chinese revolution, to see the extent that the revolution adhered to Marxist doctrine. Classical Marxism will be defined by the works of Karl Marx and Fedrich Engels and Mao Zedong thought will be defined by the works of Mao Zedong. The primary sources used for this essay are Selected Work of Mao Zedong and Marx and Engels: Selected Works. To investigate the Marxist nature of the Chinese revolution, I break down the revolution into three parts: cause, process and effect. To analyse these three parts, three consequential questions are asked. Firstly, what is a Socialist revolution? From here I will investigate the cause of socialist revolution from Marx’s and Mao’s point of view. Secondly, how did Mao adapt Marxism to China? From this question I will investigate the process of socialist revolution from Marx’s and Mao’s point of view. Thirdly, to what extent was China after the Chinese revolution a socialist state? From here I will investigate the effect of Chinese revolution to what Marx viewed as a socialist state. From this analysis, I will prove that the Chinese revolution was not a socialist revolution as defined by Marx, but simply a movement to overthrow a corrupt government dressed up in Marxist jargon.

2. “What is a Socialist Revolution?”: Cause First we shall look at social revolution from the Classical Marx point of view. The historical context in which Marx and Engels established their social theory was the post-industrial revolution and European capitalist society. Classical Marxism is a doctrine based upon “economic relations” . The value of using Marx-Engels Selected Works is that it originated from Marx himself. Therefore it gives us access to Marxism in its purest form; Marx’s own academic thoughts, which would be valuable when doing a



Bibliography: Dutt, C P. Political Economy: a Textbook Issued by the Institute of Economics of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1957. Engels, Frederick. Marx-Engels Selected Works. Trans. Edward Aveling. Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress, 1969. The Principles of Communism. 20 June 2008 <http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm>. Gregor, James A., and Maria H. Chang. "Maoism and Marxism in Comparative Perspective." The Review of Politics 3rd ser. 40 (1978): 307-327. Hsu, Immanuel C. The Rise of Modern China. 3rd ed. Hong Kong: Oxford UP, 1985. 655. Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. Marx/Engels Selected Works. Trans. Samuel Moore. Vol. 1. Moscow: Progress, 1969. Manifesto of the Communist Party. 20 June 2008 <http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm>. Marx, Karl. Marx-Engels Collected Works. Trans. Edward Aveling. Vol. 5. Moscow: Progress, 1970. The German Ideology. 20 June 2008 <http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/index.htm>. Schrecker, John E. The Chinese Revolution in Historical Perspective. 2nd ed. London: Praeger, 2004. 225. Singer, Peter. Marx: a Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford UP, 1980. Spence, Johnathan D. The Search for Modern China. 1st ed. New York: W,W, Norton, 1991. 583. Zedong, Mao. Selected Works of Mao Zedong. Vol. 2. Peking: Foreign Languages P, 1977. The Chinese Revolution and the Chinese Communist Party. 20 June 2008 <http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-2/mswv2_23.htm>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful