Preview

To What Extent Was Hitler’s ‘Indefinite Postponement’ of Operation Sealion Due to the Royal Air Forces Victory over the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain?

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Was Hitler’s ‘Indefinite Postponement’ of Operation Sealion Due to the Royal Air Forces Victory over the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain?
Part A: Plan of Investigation

After France’s surrender to Germany on June 22nd 1940, Germany turned to Britain as the only country stopping them from total control of Europe. When a political solution could not be met, Hitler devised a plan to invade Britain, codenamed Operation Sealion. It involved a seaborne attack across the English Channel but because the Royal Navy (RN) was vastly superior to the Kriegsmarine, Hitler decided to only go forward with the attack if the Luftwaffe had air superiority over the Royal Air Force (RAF). Operation Sealion was postponed indefinitely on September 17th, 1940, two days after the Luftwaffe’s defeat on what is know as the Battle of Britain Day (Sept. 15, 1940). The question therefore is, to what extent was Hitler’s ‘indefinite postponement’ of Operation Sealion due to the Royal Air Forces victory over the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain?

There are three areas of investigation. The first is the air perspective, focussing on the effects of the RAF’s victory in the Battle of Britain. The second is the naval perspective of the battle including a comparison of the RN and Kriegsmarine’s size and abilities. The third is the political and strategical views by Hitler and the Wehrmacht (unified armed forces of Germany from 1935-1945). A variety of secondary sources will be used such as works by notable historian John Keegan and a three-part article on Britain’s defences in 1940 by British historians Christina Goulter, Andrew Gordon and Gary Sheffield. Winston Churchill’s “The Few” speech is used as a primary document to gain insight about Britain’s view on the battle at the time.

Part B: Summary of Facts
The Luftwaffe’s loss in the Battle of Britain affected Hitler’s decision to cancel Operation Sealion.
Luftwaffe Facts • Commanded by Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering • Produced 140 Messerschmitt 109s and 90 Me110 fighter jets per month totalling 900 fighters[1] • Totalled 1000 Dornier17s,



Cited: Royal Air Force. Background to the Battle of Britain. 16 Feb. 2005. 30 Apr. 2011 < http://www.raf.mod.uk> Barnett, Corelli Churchill, Winston. “The Few,” Selected Speeches of Winston Churchill, 20 Aug. 1940. 30 Apr. 2011 Gordon, Andrew, ed Goulter, Christina. Battle of Britain: The Air Perspective. Saluting the Few: The Triumph of British Air Power in 1940. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2006. Goulter, Christina and Andrew Gordon and Gary Sheffield. The Royal Navy did not win the ‘Battle of Britain’ But we need a Holistic View of Britain’s Defences in 1940. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2006. Keegan, John. The Second World War. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1990. Sheffield, Gary. Battle of Britain: The Land Perspective. Operation Sealion and the Battle of Britain: A Land Perspective. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2006. Snow, Peter and Dan Snow. Battlefield Britain. London: BBC Books, BBC Worldwide Ltd, 2004. ----------------------- [1] John Keegan, The Second World War (London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1990), 92 [2] Ibid Keegan, 94 [3] Peter Snow and Dan Snow, Battlefield Britain (London: BBC Books, BBC Worldwide Ltd, 2004), 194 [6] “Background to the Battle of Britain” Royal Air Force, 30 Apr. 2011 < http://www.raf.mod.uk> [7] Ibid Keegan, 92 [12] Winston Churchill, “The Few,” Selected Speeches of Winston Churchill, 30 Apr. 2011 [13] German Naval Historical Staff, Brief Statement of Reasons for Cancellation of Invasion of England, 1944, in Battle of Britain: The Naval Perspective [14] Peter Snow and Dan Snow, Battlefield Britain (London: BBC Books, BBC Worldwide Ltd, 2004), 194 [15] Christina Goulter, Battle of Britain: The Air Perspective [16] Andrew Gordon, Battle of Britain: The Naval Perspective. The Whale and the Elephant, (London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2006) [17] Gary Sheffield, Battle of Britain: The Land Perspective [18] Ibid Goulter [19] John Keegan, The Second World War (London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1990), 91 [26] John Keegan, The Second World War (London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1990), 102 [27] Christina Goulter, Battle of Britain: The Air Perspective [28] Andrew Gordon, Battle of Britain: The Naval Perspective. The Whale and the Elephant, (London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2006) [29] Ibid Gordon [30] Corelli Barnett, “Both Services Played Heroic Role in the Battle of Britain”, The Daily Telegraph, 25 August, 2006, 28 [31] Gary Sheffield, Battle of Britain: The Land Perspective [32] Andrew Gordon, Battle of Britain: The Naval Perspective. The Whale and the Elephant, (London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, 2006

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bacp Case Study

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 1st Canadian Division held a lot of the equipment, having a position of vital importance as the air effort battled against the Luftwaffe in the summer of 1940, and participated in the Luftwaffe’s last large daylight attack on September 27. Tarnishing their invasion plans, the Germans resorted to night bombing, and the attacks became less frequent. The benefit of Canada’s involvement in defending British airways added both strength and number to the British RAF, essentially preserving and saving British infrastructure and civilians. On every battlefront, even today, air superiority is key in winning a war, a proactive measure for which air forces must be trained for an unremitting and useful contribution to a land battle. Anglo-Canadian cooperation in the Battle of Britain also had many advantages, namely the way in which the combined material resources, intellectual assets, and troops were utilized, certainly in the air war. The German Luftwaffe, outnumbering the British air force by almost twofold, had intended to attack RAF bases, seaports, and then instigate their ground assault. With Canada as a close ally, however, the RCAF began assembling Hurricane fighters and were training pilots to defend Britain – in retaliation for a bombing in London, the Allies began bombing German cities, and the ever-growing number of German air losses forced Hitler to delay his campaign to invade Britain under Operation Sea Lion…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was believed that the air warfare could shorten the war to “a week of horror followed by surrender,” and in turn could save thousands of young men from being stuck out in the trenches. The air war turned into a fight of brains and brawn as they struggled to find their harmony. Despite the moral shortcomings, in this time of war there was no denying “the operational effectiveness” of the Allied air…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those were the most important dates of the Battle Of Britain. The battle was won by the Britain Air Force! They defeated Nazi…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    D Day Summative Essay

    • 3183 Words
    • 4 Pages

    vast numerical superiority in the Allies’ favour3 , Allied air supremacy 4 , and a lucky break in the…

    • 3183 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lolololololololol

    • 3943 Words
    • 16 Pages

    ‘The War at Sea was much more important and threatening for Britain in the Second World War than it was in the First World War.’…

    • 3943 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a. Who was the British leader in this naval battle and what happened to him?…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mission Command

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With German forces on the run following the Allied success at Normandy and the breakout and pursuit across France, Allied forces were staged to enter Germany in late summer 1944. Both Field Marshal Montgomery and General Bradley clamored to be given the priority of effort. General Eisenhower chose Montgomery’s Operation MARKET GARDEN as the plan for action. It called for airborne forces to open the route for a ground force to move more than sixty miles up a single road, ending up north of the Rhine River near Arnhem, Netherlands. By accomplishing this task, the German Ruhr industrial heartland would be within easy grasp. But the operation failed. The ground force did not make it to the last bridge; it was six more months before Allied forces crossed the Lower Rhine River near Arnhem. Between 17 and 26 September 1944, there were 17,000 Allied casualties including eighty percent of the 1st Airborne Division (UK). The historical evidence overwhelmingly shows that the British 1st Airborne Division lost the Battle of Arnhem because of poor planning. This paper will prove the failure of The Battle of Arnhem was not solely the fault of MG Roy Urquhart. Although this was his first command of such a division (being an "outsider") could he have not completed his wartime mission any better despite having inexperienced leaders planning airborne operations, bad intelligence, allowing the Air Force to plan the DZs based off what was best for the air movement plan and poor execution. This paper examines MG Urquhart, the commander of 1st Airborne Division (UK).…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war highlighted the inadequacies of the British military and was seen as a national humiliation: The experienced and well-funded army…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fdr and Winston Churchill

    • 2904 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Jablonsky, David. Churchill: The Great Game and Total War. Portland: International Specialized Book Services, Inc., 1991.…

    • 2904 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years Britain had been known to have one of the mightiest military powers in the world. This sentiment was only furthered by their 1588 defeat of the Spanish Armada and again by their defeat of the French in 1763 (in the seven years’ war). In contrast, the colonies had small militias made up of mere citizens that were, for the most part, untrained in battle or military strategy. How could anyone expect the colonies, with their lowly militias, to ever hope to bring down such a force as the renowned British military?…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler's forces, in an attempt to achieve air superiority, were preparing for an invasion of Britain code-named "Operation Sea Lion." Prime Minister Winston Churchill, speaking of the British pilots in an August speech, said, "Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few." The British defenses held, and Hitler quietly canceled Operation Sea Lion in October. The Battle of Britain was the first major campaign to be fought entirely by air forces, and was also the largest and most sustained aerial bombing campaign to that date. The Battle of Britain marked the first defeat of Hitler’s military…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Churchill’s justification for not following the advice of Jellicoe regarding the Yorkshire Raids is unjustified. Churchill argues that because the information obtained by Room 40, that the Admiralty was basing their decision on, was untested and highly speculative there was no real need to take the information seriously. Any information obtained by Room 40 is going to be untested and highly speculative until put to the test. The purpose of Room 40 is to obtain information regarding the German Naval movements during the war and if the British Admiralty are not going to take the information seriously then there is no point in obtaining the information at all. Furthermore, Churchill argues that the risks of accident, submarines and mines faced…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War I Gas Attacks

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Miller, Tyrus. "Overview of 'Dulce et Decorum Est '." Poetry for Students. Ed. Michael L.…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1916 witnessed the commencement of the battle of the Somme. Through the course of that one battle, a million British men were slaughtered compared to the combined number of American casualties in both the first and Second World War. The Battle of the Somme was planned as a joint French and British operation, approved by Haig. However, the German attack on Verdun in February 1916 turned the Somme offensive into a large-scale British attack. Haig accepted responsibility for the action and with the help of Rawlinson who devised his own plan of attack. The vital part of Haig's strategy was an eight-day attack to destroy the German defenses. Soldiers were lined up according to battlefield strategies, and led by major officers. The blood of the nations was poured into conditions of such horror and violence. “Lions led by donkeys”, was how the German soldiers referred to their British counterpart. Ever since the end of WW1 in 1918 which was won by the British allies against the Germans it has been hugely debated whether the phrase 'Lions Led by Donkeys' is correct. In this essay I am going to talk about the extent of which the phrase was a fair description of what had happened at the battle of the Somme, by looking at different people’s point of view about General Haig.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadas Emerging Identity

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hill, Duncan, ed. Chronicle of War 1914 to the Present Day. Hertfordshire, UK: Atlantic Publishing, 2009. Print.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics