In this essay, I will attempt to answer the question: “To what extent may the subjective nature of perception be regarded as an advantage for artists but an obstacle for scientists?” To begin my essay, I will firstly define the key terms in the question provided. The term “subjective nature of perception” is defined as different possible ideas and views of any subject in question, usually based on personal opinions instead of facts. The term “artists” refers to people in general who have painted and drawn pictures or sculptured statues and so on; and “scientists” refers to experienced researchers whose profession is to explore in-depth the natural and physical sciences. My framework for this essay will hence be comparing the both the positive and negative effects of perception on the fields of art and science, while taking the stand that the subjective nature of perception is advantageous for the former, and a hindrance to the latter to a larger extent.
Perception is important to attain knowledge. Through a piece of art, an artist is able to bring forth his views of a certain subject. For example, if different artists were given, say, each an identical chair, none of the resulting drawings would be identical. This is because every artist would draw his picture at a different angle as compared to the others, proving that perception plays an important role in the portrayal of a subject in the field of art. Artists can also play on the strings of perception in our minds in their artworks. An apt example is the famous street artist Kurt Wenner, who makes use of the mind’s perspective to bring across his interesting paintings. Many of his paintings make the pavement or walls look as if there was something in them, usually an image of a hole with objects in it. These works of art use the viewers’ perceptions to make them appealing, further emphasizing the advantages that the subjective nature of perception can provide in the field of art. The viewers’ perception...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document