Preview

To what extent is a future stateless society an anarchist fantasy? 45 Marks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
964 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent is a future stateless society an anarchist fantasy? 45 Marks
Introduction
All anarchists believe in a stateless society due to individuals being able to regulate themselves. They would argue that there has not always been a state and therefore doesn’t have to be one in modern day. However, critiques would argue that this is a fantasy and so is impossible.

Paragraph 1

Anarchists believe strongly in natural order, which is the idea that people can organise themselves. Godwin stated that we are rational creatures who can make their own decisions. This idea supports the fact that a stateless society isn’t a fantasy because anarchists believe that if the state were to be abolished, we can use reason to make decisions explain why we made that decision.
Anarchist’s belief in economic freedom also supports the view that a stateless society isn’t a fantasy because without the state, individuals can make their own wealth. Collectivist anarchists similarly believe in common ownership which means that it isn’t just one person that owns property or land, rather it is a group of people that own this in a collection. Individualist anarchists believe in complete laissez faire, free market and being allowed to own your own property. They believe that there is no reason for state involvement in the ownership of property because we are autonomous creatures.
One sub strand of the anarchist ideology which supports the idea of state free society not being a fantasy is anti-clericalism. Anarchists regard religion as an institutionalised source of oppression. The church and state are linked with religion, preaching obedience to rulers while also preaching a set of reliable values that rob us of moral independence.

Paragraph 2
One core belief of anarchism is Anti-statism. This is the opposition to state intervention into personal, social and economic affairs. Anarchists believe that authority is an offense against the principles of liberty and equality and that we are free autonomous creatures who should treat each other with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thoreau's utopian government is one, which enforces very few parameters. "I heartily accept the motto, 'That government is best which governs least'" "I believe--'That government is best which governs not at all'; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have " (On Duty of Civil Disobedience.) Thoreau makes it clear that all men should oppose every unjust law or guideline, which contradicts the conscience within each citizen who is under the government's control.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas More, Niccolo Machiavelli, and John Calvin are three theorists who share and justify their views on the relationship between the state and religion. More, the Catholic, Machiavelli, a critic of the Catholic Church, and Calvin, the Protestant, all believe that religion is a very important element of the state. However, More and Calvin also believe that religion can constrain rulers as well as support them, which ultimately leads to their conclusion that the arbitrary use of power by the state should have a limit. In the book Utopia, Thomas More describes what he believes an ideal society’s characteristics are by creating a fictional state, a Utopia. He builds the new world on paper. One of the more significant points in More’s piece is that religion is a…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pls 201

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anarchists: Someone who longs for a lack of hierarchy. not for chaos, but believe people are peace. Can handle.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anarchists believed in a society free of governmental institutions. This movement was viewed as extremist especially when it was associated with violent deeds like political assassinations.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “True freedom is the capacity for acting according to one's true character, to be altogether one's self, to be self-determined and not subject to outside coercion” (Corliss Lamont). The book Anthem by Ayn Rand, takes place in a collective society, all independence is eradicated. People can’t choose their name, can’t ever be alone, and never say the word “I”. They are mindless workers with the same routine everyday, until one man realizes the truth to life. The behemoth rulers of this society are the only ones who can think freely and make decisions. This sadistic society remains that way for many years because all people that are born are raised the same, brainwashed. They cannot be independant and don’t feel…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Utopian Analysis

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Talmon argues that utopianism assumes an ‘ultimate harmony’ of individual expression and social cohesion. However, he asserts that without coercion, these values cannot in fact be reconciled; no society can hope for both ‘freedom’ and ‘salvation’. Berlin agrees, holding that ‘the necessity of choosing between absolute claims is… an inescapable characteristic of the human condition’. This is why anti-utopian authors believe that utopian thought conforms to the ‘anti-liberal’ aspect of Goodwin and Taylor’s definition of authoritarianism: freedom of choice in life is restricted or completely curtailed in order to achieve social cohesion.A utopia that serves as a useful example of this was conceived by Rousseau. In The Social Contract, he argues that members of an ideal legislature should, after rational consideration, conform to the ‘general will’. This is ‘the balance that remains, when we take away from [individual wills], the pluses and minuses which cancel each other out. For each individual, the general will becomes ‘their own’. Hence, when they obey it, they are obeying themselves. As a result of this, when people are coerced into following the general will, they are being ‘forced to be free’. Another key utopian thinker, Marx, proposes a theory that fulfils all three of Goodwin and Taylor’s criteria for authoritarianism. It holds that…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarian Stereotypes

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is a misconception that these people assume from criticisms libertarians have about government. People assume since this group is so critical about government that libertarians do not want any form of government. However, that is simply untrue. Michael Shermer outlines the basics of what it means to be a libertarian in his online article “The Case for Libertarianism” when he states “But, basically, libertarians are for freedom and liberty for individuals, and yet we recognize that in order to be free we must also be protected. Libertarianism is grounded in the Principle of Freedom: All people are free to think, believe, and act as they choose, as long as they do not infringe on the equal freedom of others”. Being a libertarian simply means wanting to maximize individual freedom and minimize government intervention which is also why being libertarian is not synonymous with being an anarchist. An anarchist wants no government as opposed to a libertarian who just wants a limited…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes, T. (1972). The Case against anarchy. In J. Rachels & F. Tillman (Eds.) Philosophical…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anarchism, not in the sense of lawlessness, but in the sense of noninterventionist governmental policy and activity, has a colorful history in the United States. It has enjoyed periods of welcoming and periods of scorn by every class of people and for widely varied reasons. It is embraced by free market economists and by the socially liberal, favored in part by both major parties and wholly endorsed by the Libertarian Party in the U.S. today. In the past, its place has been substantially different, for at different periods of time, different policies and mindsets on the parts of the citizens and the government have been at the forefront of progressive thought. Whether it is considered novel, conservative, beneficial, or detrimental is all dependent on a large array of contemporary social and economic considerations.…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    That brings up a very interesting subject, because the stereotype of anarchy is violent riots and fearful living, so if that’s true freedom, is it even a good thing to be completely free? It is true that to be free from everything would be to live in anarchy, however, this is a different type of freedom. Anarchy freedom releases restraints for individuals, which are often there for good reason, while American freedom focuses on enabling all people to achieve things as a whole, and protecting their rights as opposed to giving them more. American laws ideally allow as much freedom as possible without compromising the rights of others.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many who oppose government and advocate anarchy are in favor of voluntary associations or non-hierarchal organizations. However, the absence of government and presence of anarchy, to many, is unrealistic and dangerous because it can only be favorable to all under the assumption that we, as humans, are inherently good and will not cause mayhem if all law enforcement ceases to exist. Philosopher Immanuel Kant described anarchy as “freedom and law without force,” but to many freedom means being able to walk outside without fear and with the knowledge that our rights are protected by a system put in place in order to inforce the law. While the absence of government does relieve us from the restraints that impede our complete freedom, it also makes our safety completely dependent on the idea that humans are inherently good, an idea that has been proven wrong time and again through systematic racism, slavery, murder, and…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau begins Civil Disobedience with the famous quote "That government is best which governs least," and he explains a government that does not get in people's lives. Government is only a scheme. It exists because the people have chose to choose their will, but it is easy to take advantage of. The Mexican War is an example that thoreau used to explain the the government as their tool. Thoreau maintains that government as a foundation that prevents the accomplishment of the work it created.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Isms

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | A moral-political ideal of a society that is untouched by relations of power and domination among human beings; There is an absence of organized government.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    (2)Secondly, government possesses the ability to maintain order within society. As Austin Fagothey states 'Anarchists think that society can get…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Ideology Essay

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Through out the past there have been many different forms of political ideology. With all theses different types of government you have to wonder sometimes which one of theses forms of government would be the best to run the ideal society. In this paper I will compare and contrast; liberalism, social democracy, fascism, communism, and anarchy. Also I will give my opinion on which one of these forms of government would be the most ideal to run a modern day county or society. Before I can begin comparing and contrasting we need to have a working understanding of all the political ideology’s stated above.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics