To What Extent Are Volcanoes More Harmful To Our Society Than Earthquakes
To what extent are volcanoes more harmful to our society than earthquakes?
Many people may argue that volcanoes are much more dangerous than earthquakes due to the devastating impact it has on people lives and the area it takes place in; however, others may solidify that earthquakes are infinitely more catastrophic than volcanoes considering the amount of destruction that it causes.
There are two types of plates, oceanic and continental. Various types of movement occur along the different types of plate boundaries. Earthquakes measuring a magnitude of 1-6 are not that powerful; therefore, not much damage will be produced; however, earthquakes measuring of a magnitude of 6+ are going to be much more severe. In my opinion, Earthquakes present people with a more immediate danger and are more dangerous towards people than volcanoes, especially when cities and towns are affected. Also earthquakes have several aftershocks which a highly dangerous. An earthquake takes place when two different tectonic plates converge or transform against one another causing them to get stuck, the pressure then builds up for hundreds of years until one day the pressure releases causing earthquakes.
The primary results being that they can kill/injure many people in collapsing buildings and do a mass of damage to the country economy's with the amount of money they have to put in for repairing buildings and funding emergency aid for people; however, this differs on how developed a country is. Earthquakes can also have secondary effects such as disease and starvation (LEDCs particularly) leading to more deaths and more funds being put into injuries. Furthermore, the reason why Earthquakes are more dangerous compared to volcanoes is that earthquakes are unpredictable; we only know they will happen along a plate margin but not where or when specifically. Some short term impacts of an earthquake could be that; People may be killed or injured. Homes may be destroyed. Transport and
Many people may argue that volcanoes are much more dangerous than earthquakes due to the devastating impact it has on people lives and the area it takes place in; however, others may solidify that earthquakes are infinitely more catastrophic than volcanoes considering the amount of destruction that it causes.
There are two types of plates, oceanic and continental. Various types of movement occur along the different types of plate boundaries. Earthquakes measuring a magnitude of 1-6 are not that powerful; therefore, not much damage will be produced; however, earthquakes measuring of a magnitude of 6+ are going to be much more severe. In my opinion, Earthquakes present people with a more immediate danger and are more dangerous towards people than volcanoes, especially when cities and towns are affected. Also earthquakes have several aftershocks which a highly dangerous. An earthquake takes place when two different tectonic plates converge or transform against one another causing them to get stuck, the pressure then builds up for hundreds of years until one day the pressure releases causing earthquakes.
The primary results being that they can kill/injure many people in collapsing buildings and do a mass of damage to the country economy's with the amount of money they have to put in for repairing buildings and funding emergency aid for people; however, this differs on how developed a country is. Earthquakes can also have secondary effects such as disease and starvation (LEDCs particularly) leading to more deaths and more funds being put into injuries. Furthermore, the reason why Earthquakes are more dangerous compared to volcanoes is that earthquakes are unpredictable; we only know they will happen along a plate margin but not where or when specifically. Some short term impacts of an earthquake could be that; People may be killed or injured. Homes may be destroyed. Transport and