To Kill A Mockingbird Book And Movie Comparison Essay

Stephen King, the master of horror in literature, once said “Books and movies are like apples and oranges. They both are fruit, but taste completely different”.This brings to question how horror differs in novels and films.
For a long time, reading books and watching movies has been a common interest of both teenagers and adults. We not only watch movies and read books about comedy, romance, adventure, and drama; we also crave horror. We can trace the literary genre of literature all the way back to the 1200s. At the time, horror was considered witchcraft. Although the practice was feared, it also created a great deal of intrigue and thrill amongst audiences. Horror at the time was usually linked to religion, especially in regards Satanism
In the book, she wears a red velvet dress. It is a symbol of foreshadowing rather than a perfect canvas for blood. Peirce likely chose to change the color of the dress given that visuals are most important in film. It is rather uncommon for a film to use foreshadowing through visual details, as they would usually go unnoticed by the audience. For instance, in the film adaptation of To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, the flowers and birds hold no significance whereas in the novel they give away a lot of information regarding important ideas and
The key elements in a good horror film include good actors, marking visuals, and a large budget. On the other hand, intense, descriptive imagery and longer lasting suspense is crucial in successful horror novels. A novel cannot be directly and exactly translated into film given limitations motion pictures have. Most of the time, other elements such as visual effects have to be added in order to scare the audience through the visual medium. Therefore, a terrifying novel may very well turn into a rather bland film if not properly executed in the same way that a bland novel can be turned into a chilling film through strong additions, direction, and