Top-Rated Free Essay

"To Build a Fire"

Satisfactory Essays
After comparing/contrasting the movie and the short story versions of "To Build a Fire", the story version is a more effective art form. If you take the story and the book, of course stories are more detailed. Movies are too, but not as much as stories. Stories are more understandable. Because you can go back and read it, if you don't understand.

The difference between the story and the movie was the story was more detailed and descriptive. It was also more interesting reading the story. When you see the movie it's too dull and plain. In the story the man is explained better and how he acts is better. The five senses are described better in the story than in the movie. The story shows how it is good and interesting; the movie is just a man and a dog trying to head to camp. The dog is better described in the story than in the movie. So overall to me the story was much more interesting and detailed than in the movie.

The similarities in the movie and the story were they had the setting and everything the same. It also had the same characteristics. The man and the dog looked looked just like they were described in the story. And it looked like the man didn't have an imagination like it said in the story. Both were descriptive and fun to do. When you watch the movie and read the story you can sort of sense how cold it is. The dog in both acted just like he was explained, cold, harmless, and boring. Also in common they had tried to make a fire.

After comparing/contrasting the movie and the short story versions of "To Build a Fire", the story version is a more effective art form. I think that because the story is more realistic. When the movie was on it seemed more fake. But overall I think that the story was a better way to understand it.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both the book and the movie are very different, they have lots of similarities and differences. The Setting, Plot and Characterisation are three parts that the book and movie can be compared.…

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There can be both big differences and small differences between the books and movies of stories created. Many of the differences can create a huge impact on how people see the story. Some people like the books better because of the detail and some people like the movie because it is easier to picture. Both can be seen in different…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first reason is; the movie again had more visuals than the book. Expanding on this; the movie had more scenery to show the viewer where the story takes place. Additionally, the movie also showed the the time era it took place in through setting; this in turn gives the viewer a better idea of how to perceive the story in this aspect. Second the movie had the advantage of being able to show what was going on through setting. My first reason being the movie showed the position of the characters and their behavior; this in turn displayed the tension through setting. Moreover, the movie also showed the main character’s whereabouts better through visual transitions. Last but not least, the movie showed more setting changes than the book. The book could only tell the reader that there was a change in the setting; these are usually major changes; the movie could show the more subtle ones, adding to the quality of the experience. The movie also set the mood better than the book through setting changes or adjustments. Concluding this; I believe the movie expressed the setting better than the…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ever read a book, and then seen the movie? The book is usually better right? That’s most likely because of the differences. The book is more descriptive most of the time. Events in the book are missing from the movie. Or the movie adds some in.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book was better than the movie on account of it had way more details, and it had more parts in it than the movie did. It is extremely time-consuming to fit an entire book in a less than two hour long movie, but authors and readers can produce a book as long as you want. Although the movie took a shorter time to watch than reading the book did, the readers can retrieve more from a book than they can retrieve from watching a movie. Even in movies that into feeling by the book scene for scene there is still less detail in the movie than there is in the book.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ¨Outsiders¨ book and movie are the same in the story line, but the details differ at times.But the similarities are more common than the differences, so it was an all in all good story.Even though adding a bit more Sodapop would make it a bit sweeter.The differences just show how books and movies will just never be the…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Call of the Wild and To Build a Fire were both exciting books about serving in the freezing cold attic yet they also have many differences. Call of the Wild is a story of a dog trying to survive the Alaskan gold rush. To Build a Fire follows a similar storyline yet it is about a man instead of a dog. Although the two books have many similarities such as where the book took place and the the style of writing they also have many differences such as the ending and the main character.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the road book vs movie

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A long time has passed since the idea that “The book is better than the movie” was accepted without question. Most of the time, if the movies follow an original script and there is no book version to compare it to, it is most likely to be seen as a great piece of work. However, when a film is present to be compared against a novel, it is inevitably not as great as the original work. There is also a limitation on films due to their format. A three-hour film is considered extremely long and lengthy, and most directors and filmmakers generally try and cut crop and edit out unnecessary and uneventful parts of a certain book to fit a golden rule of thumb that allows for movies to be about two hours long. Because a book adaptation is meant to tell the gist of the story, it is usually concentrated on making it possible to grasp the overall plot in one sitting.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personally, I liked the book better than the movie. Although the book was confusing at certain points, for example when the chief would refer to the fog, it went into greater detail and was more interesting than the movie. The director changed the movie around for entertainment purposes rather than directly following all the events from the novel. The mood of the characters comparing the book and the movie differ. Each character is depicted in a different way in the movie setting a dissimilar temperament every scene.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To Build a Fire” takes place in the Yukon Wilderness. A gold discovery in 1897 led many to brave the Yukon Wilderness (Murdrock). “Within six months, approximately 100,000 gold-seekers set off for the Yukon. Only 30,000 completed the trip” (Murdrock). The Yukon was a very cold and dangerous place with average temperatures around negative twenty degrees with lows reaching far passed negative fifty degrees (Murdrock). With only thirty percent of gold seekers completing the trip with even less claiming the riches they were seeking.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another major difference between the movie and book is the perspective in which each is told in. The movie was definitely much easier to comprehend then the book because the movie you get to watch everything that…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were so many differences and similarities between the movie and the story. From the way Charlie was improving to the different jobs that Charlie had. In Flowers to Algernon some parts were extras. In the movie and some details were just changed. Most of it was the same…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The story and the movie compare to each other so well due to several different reasons. First off, both of these are based off of true stories which is really upsetting if you think about it because people during both times were getting falsely accused of crimes. That means that innocent people were getting punished because of someone else’s false accusations. Another thing that is similar about them is when…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters had been very much different. From the novel and to the movie, they had not even included the character under the name of Reuven. As well as, Rivka was introduced at the beginning instead of when they had met her at the camp in the novel. As well as, in the movie, the rabbi spoke out much more than in the novel. In the novel, the rabbi faded out of the novel as it went on. The plot from the novel and the movie was very different too. In the novel, the people caught escaping were shot, yet in the movie they were hung. In the movie, they had a Seder in the camp yet in the novel, they did not. As well as, in the movie, they had put pellets into the chamber to kill people, yet they didn't do that in the novel. They had other smaller details included that were different, yet they did not have any impact on the story, such as how they had to dig instead of doing their special jobs like in the…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays