Preview

Title Vii Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Title Vii Case
1. What is one aspect of Title VII that has been violated by the company?
2. Which actions by the two employees that call their credibility into question are you allowed, as an employer, to consider? Or, what types of actions are you not allowed to use and why? Are there any you wish you could use?

Title VII states that it is an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Mary has now vowed to not hire ANY while males in her department after Paul made a backhand comment about why they downsized 25% of their white male workforce in order to be more HR compliant. Paul now feels that that was a wrong decision and that they should hire more white males. Also, Mary is guilty
…show more content…
(Hence, the reason for the nickname “Puff”). Jackie’s gender reassignment surgery is also something that some employers will call into question if they don’t personally agree with her choice to go from male to female. Peter’s credibility will always be in question because of his past discretions, but shouldn’t because he has passed his recent drug tests. Jackie’s credibility will be in question because people may not trust her character and her personal decisions since she decided to become a female. Some people may never feel comfortable with her ever again because they can’t get over the past that she was born a male, but made a personal decision to be a female. In addition to this, Peter’s word may never mean anything to some of his professional (and personal) counterparts because he has relapsed and failed a couple drug tests, but in his recent situations, he was drug free and had completed a rehab program and was medically deemed as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (a) It shall be an unlawfulemploymentpractice for an employer(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to dischargeany individual,or otherwiseto discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation,terms, conditions, or…

    • 9192 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 3 Quiz

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages

    cut back on traditional diversity training and instead focus training efforts on team building, cooperation, and company esprit de corps.…

    • 2463 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did the Title VII section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (updated in 1991) go far enough and provide adequate protection for the U.S. workforce? For the vast majority of states, the answer is a resounding yes; most states defer to the federal legislation for employment-related discrimination laws. There are, however, a handful of states that have enacted their own versions of Title VII; in doing so, they are effectively saying that no, Title VII does not meet the needs of our state. One state that has enacted its own form of employment discrimination laws is Florida; in 1992, the Florida Legislature passed the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Section 760.10 specifically addresses many of the same issues covered by Title VII protections. What is the same, and what is different, between the two Acts? This paper will summarize the two sets of laws, describe the similarities, and detail the distinct differences between Title VI, the federal law, and Section 760.10 of the Florida law.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. In order for an employee to present a prima facie case for national origin discrimination, an employee would have to have prima facie evidence sufficient enough for a decision or verdict to be…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has been arguably one of the most historic pieces of legislation to shape employment law in modern times. While it offers protection to employees on the basis of race, age, sex, religion, disability, and national origin, it does highly contested, controversial, and present subject in political and social progressive dialogues in recent years. The federal law has not seen much benefit from this activity, but activity has altered change on the state level.…

    • 3283 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law prohibits employers from discriminating their employees on the basis of religion, race, sex, color, and national origin. Since Mrs. Ledbetter was paid significantly less than her male employees at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. it is evident that she felt she was a victim of gender discrimination, and thus filed a complaint against Goodyear for violating the Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 introduced the concepts of protected classes and unlawful employment practices to American business. It is unlawful under Title VII for an employer to hire or discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his or her compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s race, color, religion, sex or national origin. This covers hiring, firing, promotions and all workplace conduct. The statute applies to private sector employers with 15 or more employees and public sector employers at the federal, state, and local level. Title VII prohibits employment decisions based on stereotypes and assumptions about abilities, traits, or the performance of individuals on the basis of their protected status.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The lawsuit that I have chosen is about a company not hiring someone because of their race. Tyeastia Green sued Alliant Techsystems, Inc. (ATK) because they did not hire her due to her race. A recruiter for ATK initially told her that she had gotten the job, later ATK rejected her and hired a while male instead ("U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission", 2012).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII, the federal law that prohibits most workplace harassment and discrimination, covers all private employers, state and local governments, and educational institutions with 15 or more employees. In addition to prohibiting discrimination against workers because of race, color, national origin, religion, and sex, those protections have been extended to include barring against discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, sex stereotyping, and sexual harassment of employees.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Prohibits discrimination for race, color, religion, sex, or national origin for companies with 15 or more employees working on a given day [ (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC], Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) ]. Since our company has more than 15 employees, we are legally required to abide by Title VII.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Main issue - Student claims that university actions were unconstitutional. Did the university violate the student’s due process rights when suspending the student without a hearing?…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just Racist Case Study

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sexual harassment is a violation of Title VII when such conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with a person’s work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment (Dessler, p187). The unfortunate fact is that most people quit or try to avoid their harasser due to the fear of being fired or being judged that they are doing something wrong. To be able to address a charge of sexual harassment Jessica wants to document the complaint and start to investigate the situation. By starting the investigation she and the company are listening and want to change the situation. Once the investigation shows that there is sexual harassment occurring they then want to take the appropriate corrective action which could include an action from being suspended without pay all the way up to or including discharging the employee for their unlawful decision. The company should also start developing a stronger more in depth policy that helps prevent a sexual harassment charge to happen again. The company then should have mandatory training for all the managers to ensure they understand the importance of the policies being…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Workforce Diversity

    • 3857 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as its amendments, ¡§prohibits employment discrimination against employees, job applicants, and union members on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, and gender at any stage or employment.¡¨ It also protects employees from sexual…

    • 3857 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    a. Arbitrary employee treatment (termination, discipline, work assignments) and the abuse of authority given the absence of due process protections and the inequality in power between individual employees and management…

    • 2502 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays