Preview

Tinker vs. Des Moine

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1106 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tinker vs. Des Moine
October 8, 2012
Tinker V. Des Moines: Does the first amendment protect everyone
In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. (“Tinker V. Des Moines” 3) When students wore the arm bands they were asked to go home and suspended from school. This set up the case for Tinker v. Des Moines independent school district, a case that would determine the right of free speech for students. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.
In this court case John F. tinker, fifteen years old, Christopher Eckhardt, sixteen years old, and Mary Beth Tinker, thirteen years old were involved. In December, 1965, a group of adults and students in Des Moines held a meeting at the Eckhardt home ( “Tinker v. Des Moines” 1) The group determined to publicize their objections to the hostilities in Vietnam and their support for a truce by wearing black armbands during the holiday season and by fasting on December 16 and New Year's Eve. Petitioners and their parents had previously engaged in similar activities, and they decided to participate in the program.
Before Tinker v. Des Moines the opinions students could and couldn’t voice was decided on by the schools. This changed when three students, John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker and, Christopher Eckhardt decided to voice their opinions on the Vietnam War by wearing black arm bands (“Tinker V. Des Moines”1). The School system demanded the students to take off their arm bands or they would be suspended. The students refused to take them off didn’t attend school till after their winter break (“Tinker v. Des Moines” 1). John Tinker’s father thought this was unfair that their children were singled out for wearing armbands while other students were allowed to wear other

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Tinker vs Des Moines case is a land-mark case in upholding the rights of school children, and their freedom to express their opinions and views. Many have heard of the case, while others are unaware of its existence. The real conflict however is whether the defendants, John and Mary Beth Tinker were right or wrong. In December of 1965, the Tinker siblings decided to wear black armbands with peace signs on them to protest America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. After getting suspended from school, The Tinkers brought the case to the U.S. District Court, which raised the question: Were their rights violated? The answer is obvious. The school was incorrect in their actions, and the Tinkers rights were impeded upon because they did not cause…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    That the students in the Tinker case were protesting and in the Hazelwood case they believed that their rights got taken away.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stephen and Darleen Fournier were residents of the Milford Central School District; sought to use the school after hours for meetings of the Good News Club, a private Christian organization for children. Their request was denied because the meetings were considered the same as a religious worship, which was prohibited by the school’s community use policy. The Good News Club filed a lawsuit claiming they were denied their right of free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Page
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    11). By the start of the protest over 2,000 American soldiers had been brought home in caskets (Collins. 270) They planned to wear black armbands from December 16th to New Year's Eve, and fast or refuse to eat on the 16th and New Year's Eve (Brannen). In total, five of the twelve students who wore armbands were suspended because they refused to remove them, as they were against a new school rule created by the board the day before the protest (Collins. 272). The school board learned about the protest through a school newspaper article that they barred from being published in hopes no one would hear of it (Collins. 271). The new rule stated that all students wearing armbands would be asked to remove them and any students who did not comply were to be suspended until they returned without the armband (Brannen). Mary, John, and Christopher were the only students to sue the school board (Rapport. 7). During the lawsuit against the school district Mary, John, and Christopher asked ICLU (Iowa Civil Liberties Union) to represent them in court (Rapport. 18). The first trial in the Des Moines Federal District Court was on July 25, 1966 (Rapport. 31). John Tinker was the first witness of the trial (Rapport. 36). When the district court dismissed the lawsuit, the federal court affirmed the district court's ruling, and only then did the tinkers and eckhardts appeal the case to the supreme court (Brannen). Finally the supreme court ruled in the student's favor with seven justices for the students and two against on February 24, 1969 (Brannen). The time it took to get the final decision from the Supreme Court was over three years, for a case that would have a lasting affect on constitutional law…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    December 1965, a group of students met at Christopher Eckhardt's home and discussed that they wanted to show support for the truce in the vietnam war. They decided they would wear armbands to school to support it, but the principles of the Des Moines school found out about their plan. A new rule in school was passed. That all students wearing any armband would be asked to remove it, and if they refused, they would be suspended. On the 16th of December, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt both wore armbands to school, were asked to remove the armbands, and when they refused, they were send home. The next day, John Tinker had the same situation and and resulted the same way. In response to the suspension, the students sued the school district…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A famous boxer and practitioner of peaceful resistance to laws once refused to join the draft for the Vietnam War. Muhammad Ali knew that he was violating the law, but he did not perpetuate that he was above the law; he knew the consequences and was fully prepared to accept them. He was arrested and convicted to 5 years in prison, and he underwent years of public backlash against his decision. However, it was the same war that caused the downfall of Lyndon B. Johnson, who-once revered and respected for his work in social programs to help his country-became bombarded with mockery and a daily dose of “Hey hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent State Massacre

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although so many lives were being lost in the Vietnam War, this event was upsetting to the public as “May 4th represented the war coming home to America.” (Four Dead In Ohio, 2010). There were two main perspectives during the conflict – the protestors and the authority. The protestors consisted of both students and non-students banding together to rally against the war in Vietnam. While the authority was not only the guardsmen, but the Governor James A Rodes and the Mayor of Kent at the time Leroy Satrom. This event was controversial as, even today, there are many unanswered questions including whether or not there was an order to turn and shoot the protestors, and if so, who gave the order. As well as why the guardsmen were necessary when protests were so common during the late 60s and early 70s. On Monday, May 4th 1970, the two perspectives conflicted in a conflict that resulted in four dead students and the beginning of a very influential time in…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All Through the Vietnam War, draft avoidance and resistance came to a peak, nearly crippling the Selective Service System. Joined with the rebellion inside the military and the greater civilian antiwar movement, draft resistance became yet another shackle on the government’s ability to wage a war in Vietnam, and brought the war home in a very personal way for a generation of young men. Many draft resisters filed for conscientious objector status, didn’t report for induction when called, or attempted to claim disability to preserve their rights while many others refused service to win the rights they were never given .…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of this court case was to determine whether or not wearing armbands in an educational setting is protected under Freedom of Speech. Justice Abe Fortas was against the prohibiting of armbands in school because it was protected by the First Amendment. However, Justice Hugo Black was for the prohibiting of armbands because he did not believe that people could express their opinions or beliefs anywhere or any time.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thought That We Hate

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The subjects of concern are the brave judges belonging to the 20th Century who were the pillars that laid the foundation of the First Amendment that called for what has widely become lingo – freedom of speech – but which has also become largely distorted and diluted in its meaning, in its context, and in its essence. Lewis reminds us what this amendment in the Constitution truly entails – the restriction laid on the government, the banning of offensive speech on the government’s part, is the focal point of the argument that Lewis puts before his readers. His advocacy for the first amendment and his reminder comes at a likely time for reminders, when the campaigns elections are in full swing, and when the State has been suddenly taken as if by a thunderous storm of hate speech, offensive speech, and what is tantamount to straight up vulgarity. Lewis reminds his audiences and jogs our memories back to the draft in the Constitution that deal so strictly with the issue of offensive speech. A timely judgment on Lewis’ part, this kernel of concentrated thought hits the mark with acute precision and with an iron fist, and puts many a cheek to the red blush of shame, and guilt, and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “Foundation for Individual Rights in Education” is the primary advocate group for the removal of speech codes on college campuses, working to draw attention to the growing censorship problems and striving to repeal unconstitutional restrictions. FIRE was formed in order to “empower campus activists, reform restrictive policies, and inform the public about the state of rights on our campuses” (FIRE. N.p., n.d. Web). The organization rates colleges yearly on their policies regarding free speech and assigns either a green, yellow, or red light correlating to the degree that the institution restricts speech. A green light is very rare in 2016. One college that has disavowed speech codes is the University of Chicago, which reaffirmed its policy…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been the topic of numerous debates; not only among politicians, but among college students and professors as well. As of August 1st, 50 years after the Tower Shooting at the University of Austin, the state’s campus carry law has taken effect. Professors at the University have filed a lawsuit against the state proclaiming the new law violates their academic freedom. Concerned they will no longer be able to express themselves freely, they fear they will have to confine controversial topics to avoid debates fueled by emotion which could result in injury or death.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strict School Dress Codes

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many students have even assembled a protest titled “show your shoulders,” similar to the passive rebellion in the 1960’s during the Vietnam War when a group of students from Des Moines wore black arm bands to protest against the war. Because the war cost so much money and too many lives, more and more students agreed that the war was not worth being involved in, and decided to join the movement. School principals soon became afraid that students might disrupt classrooms with their protests and a rule was passed that students could no longer wear black armbands or else they would be sent home and could not come back until they no longer wore them. Ignoring the Principal’s rule, five students continued to wear the armband and were threatened by everyone around them. Soon enough they were expelled but returned after Christmas break without the armbands and instead rebelled by wearing solid black. Since the students would not obey, principals decided to arrange a meeting with the school board and discuss the situation, and the school board immediately agreed that this was an issue and helped the principals enforce their rules but the students decided to take it to court and make it an official case, which they later won because they were protected by the first…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although students do not lose their rights as they walk through the school gates, their rights are restricted for the safety of others. The court case of Tinker v. Des Moines argues the same issue of the rights of students while on school grounds. “Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students” (OYEZ). As the armbands distracted students, the inappropriate photos of Suzie distracted upperclassmen from their educational work, which also put Suzie in an uncomfortable position depriving herself the ability to focus 100% on school work. Therefore, the principal was taking away a distraction to discipline the students which can be compared to the case of Tinker v. Des…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because they were minors, their father filed a lawsuit. He sued for a small sum of money for the damages and a law that prevented the schools officials from enforcing their anti-armband policy. Although the District Court, agreed that students had freedom of speech, they upheld the teachers who were preventing a disturbance of…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays