Tiffany Hedging Management

Topics: Exchange rate, Balance sheet, Revenue Pages: 16 (4572 words) Published: May 14, 2010
Harvard Business School

9-295-047
Rev. June 9, 1995

Tiffany & Co.—1993
In July 1993, Tiffany & Company concluded an agreement with its Japanese distributor, Mitsukoshi Limited, that would fundamentally change its business in Japan. Under the new agreement, Tiffany’s wholly owned subsidiary, Tiffany & Co. Japan Inc. (“Tiffany-Japan”), assumed management responsibilities in the operation of 29 Tiffany & Co. boutiques previously operated by Mitsukoshi in its stores and other locations in Japan. Tiffany looked forward to the new arrangement, as it was now responsible for millions of dollars in inventory that it previously sold wholesale to Mitsukoshi, resulting in enhanced revenues in Japan derived from higher retail prices. It was also apparent, however, that yen/dollar exchange rate fluctuations would now affect the dollar value of its Japanese sales, which would be realized in yen. Since Japanese sales were large and still growing, it seemed evident such fluctuations could have a substantial impact on Tiffany’s future financial performance.

Company Background
Founded in New York in 1837, Tiffany & Co. was an internationally renowned retailer, designer, manufacturer, and distributor of luxury goods. The famous blue-box company found its initial success in fine jewelry, most notably diamonds, but had since expanded its product line to include timepieces, china, crystal, silverware, and other luxury accessories. In the fiscal year ending January 31, 1993 (FY 1992), Tiffany earned $15.7 million on revenues of $486.4 million, and had total assets of $419.4 million. Recent financial statements are provided in Exhibits 1 and 2. An historical summary of operations is provided in Exhibit 3. After more than a century of independence, Tiffany was acquired by Avon Products, Inc. in 1979. For the next several years Avon, a nationwide door-to-door cosmetics marketer, worked to expand Tiffany’s product line to reach beyond its traditional affluent customer base to the larger middle market. While this diversification strategy resulted in enhanced sales for Tiffany from $84 million in 1979 to $124 million in 1983, operating expenses as a percentage of sales grew inordinately from 34% to 43% in 1978 and 1983, respectively. Avon soon realized that Tiffany’s traditional market niche was substantially different than its own, and in 1984 decided to put the company up for sale. The most attractive offer came from Tiffany’s own management, who agreed to buy back Tiffany’s equity and the Fifth Avenue store building for a total of $135.5 million. In what ultimately took the form of a leveraged buyout (LBO), the terms of the deal distributed virtually all of the equity shares to three key investor groups. Management ended up with 20% of total equity shares. Investcorp, the Research Associate Kendall Backstrand wrote this case under the supervision of Professor W. Carl Kester as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. Copyright © 1994 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685, write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163, or go to http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Harvard Business School.

1

295-047

Tiffany & Co.—1993

Bahrain and London-based merchant bank that backed management in the deal, received 49.8% of total equity shares. The third player, General Electric Credit Corporation (GECC), ended up with 25.7% of total equity shares. It was through an $85 million credit arrangement with GECC that management was able to refinance a substantial portion of the purchase price.1 The aftermath of the leveraged buyout was...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • management Essay
  • Management Research Paper
  • management Essay
  • Tiffany Essay
  • Hedging Essay
  • Operations management Essay
  • OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT Essay
  • It management Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free