Preview

Thucydides: Oligarchy And Democracy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
773 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thucydides: Oligarchy And Democracy
Question Two “From the very first day members of an oligarchy have no truck with mere equality, and they all think they deserve unquestioned first place: whereas in a democracy the result of an election is easier to bear when the loser can console himself with the thought that he was not competing with his equals.1” The political views of Thucydides are not blatantly expressed to the reader, and are quite difficult to fully understand what his views are. But as explained by his quote, the differences of the oligarchy and the democracy are evident, and democracy is explained with more of a light on it, explaining it as the better option. Thucydides does an excellent job in explaining what is going on at the time, but his own opinions of political …show more content…
Thucydides admired Pericles’ leadership ability and his ideas and concepts. One concept already explained is his idea of ‘protoandrarchy.’ Thucydides strongly supported the idea at the beginning. Along with his ideas, Thucydides also supported all the decisions Pericles had made, even if it wasn’t the best idea. For example, “as long as [Pericles] was at the head of the city in time of peace, he governed it with moderation and guarded it securely; and it was greatest under him. 3” That is how Thucydides felt, yet the Athenians were upset with Pericles because he was the main reason why Athens was at war rather than at peace. In Thucydides’ eyes, he shadows Pericles and strives to follow his path. Pericles is also a leader and an innovator for Thucydides and in his eyes, is the perfect leader. Thucydides continues to describe Pericles as the perfect human by stating, “the reason for Pericles' success was this: he was powerful because of his prestige and his intelligence, and also because he was known to be highly incorruptible. 4” Thucydides illustrates Pericles as a God, someone who is indestructible. He idolizes Pericles’ and supports his decisions. Thucydides truly admires Pericles and strives to be the shadow of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Athens has two documents that discuss democracy. The first one is “Document A: Pericles” and the other one is “Document B: The The Athenian Constitution”. In document A, I found that is truly democratic because your social class is not allowed the interfere with someone's merit. For example, if you’re poor you’re still able to serve the state or be part of the government. In document A it also states that “you get equal justice.” And that’s the way it should be. The constitution favor many people instead of few people. It seems fair and gives equality to all regardless of social class.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pericles became the leader of Athens at the end of the Peloponnesian War and was responsible for the rebuilding and reconstructing of this city. He became very powerful and well known through out the age of the 5th century, so powerful that this became known as the age of Pericles. He was the son of Xanthippus and Agariste. His father, Xanthippus was a military leader during the Peloponnesian Wars and was the victor at the Battle of Mycale. He would later ostracize himself in the spring of 484. Pericles came from a line of royalty which made it all the more easier for him to come to power. The helots revolt in Sparta and the current leader of Athens, Cimon lead troops to aid Sparta which the people…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was such a profound influence on Athenian society that Thucydides, an admirer and contemporary historian, acclaimed him as "the first citizen of Athens". Pericles turned the Delian League into an Athenian empire and led his countrymen during the first two years of the Peloponnesian War. During the Peloponnesian War, Pericles led Athens, roughly from 461 to 429 BC. This period is sometimes known as the "Age of Pericles", which happened as early as the Persian Wars.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pericles’ supporters said he was defending Athenian honor and protecting foreign trade. Pericles sternly orated to the Athenian assembly to not yield to Spartan demands (Hunt 101). Historian Thucydides, outlines Pericles speech to the assembly:…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this famous Funeral Oration, Pericles gave voice to the ideal of democracy and the importance of the individual. It was the Greeks who created the intellectual foundations of our Western heritage. They asked some basic questions about human life, philosophy, education and religion that still dominate our own intellectual pursuits , such as :…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In contrast, Kleon was opposed by Diodotus and eventually lost the debate (3.40), showing he was not as powerful an orator as his predecessor. Thucydides is also able to get across his view on the Athenian democracy, arguing that while Pericles was the leader, it was “in name a democracy [and] became in actuality rule by the first man” (2.65). However, after Pericles, it became more of a fight for a leadership position, each man trying to gain the confidence and support of the people by giving in a little to their wants (2.65). In this sense, it ventured even farther from a democracy to mob rule where all leaders either concede to the people or act in self-interest (2.65). Using Pericles and Kleon as counterparts, Thucydides presents two ends of the Athenian democracy, yet neither is a democracy in it’s truest form, implying Thucydides does not think that there is a true democracy in Athens, but rather a better version, that being Pericles, and a worse one, that of…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He risked greece being overthrown by a tyranny. There were many things that could have gone wrong with his plan. What if the Persians were faster? What if the persians had already thought of the idea? So many more thing could have gone wrong. We do not know if he even had thought through enough to have a backup plan. The people were correct to exile him because he already had much power and other than the victory he lead, he had not done much to help the democracy. Pericles had brought Athens to its best years. A blossom of education and arts had occurred and that advanced civilization globally. Themistocles could have never been able to do what Pericles had accomplished. Pericles had a vision for what he wanted Athens to look like and he went and achieved it. Pericles did not have as many enemies as Themistocles, because if he did he would have too been voted out of the democracy. Overall the better fit to rule over Athens was Pericles. Themistocles may have not been a bad choice, but he was not the best. The people of Athens where correct to chose…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thucydide rightfully finds fault with Athen’s inability to represent facts and it’s tendency to act based on disillusioned ideology on an overarching political scale. He does not make claims of political corruption or voter fraud like scandals of the modern day do. He doesn't view the notion of voting as flawed within itself; he does however attribute problems to the mindsets of Athenian citizens as well as on the athenian statesmen. From reading I would describe Athenian politics at this time as an spiraling back and forth between politicians acting as performers and an audience who continuously suspends their disbeliefs for the sake of a self assuring message. Thucydides make specific criticisms in regards to how many Athenian citizens accept rhetoric without an ounce of scrutiny. He then aims his critique at the pandering that Athen’s statesmen do in order to appeal to the monolithic opinions of the masses.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the history of the ancient Greek civilization, there were many powerful and contributing men and women. Only one could be called the “Greatest Greek” and that man’s name is Pericles. Pericles was a wise and powerful leader of the city of Athens. He was a great supporter of the concept of democracy. Pericles guided Athens almost through the entire Peloponnesian War. Pericles promoted the arts and literature. This was a main reason Athens held the reputation of being the educational and cultural centre of the ancient Greek world.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What makes Pericles special is his ability to persuade by speaking, it was very simple for him to change the outlooks of others by just talking to them, and that might as well be a super power. He was a very gracious ruler who put his all into Athens and knew how to handle it. Pericles was a unique leader because the fact that he was a "friend of the people", rather than gathering a section of the elites to put himself in power.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Athens was not truly democratic. First off, democracy is a system of government in which power is invested in the people who rule either directly or through freely elected represenative. An example of democracy; You have two treats, the dogs can pick only one treat to eat. I will let them both pick, and not only one. Democracy is equal. Ancient Athens wasn’t.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some early Greeks were sharply divided over the advantages and disadvantages of their new form of democratic government. While democracy provides equality and justice for everyone, it also allows the ignorance of the masses to control the state.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Polybius, an ancient Greek historian, stated that the combination of kingship, aristocracy, and democracy created the best constitution for the people because based on facts from his experiences, the mixture brought balance, unlike the separated governments, which produced violence and corruption. As the descendants of the previous leaders took charge, appetite and craving lured them away from showing leadership to the citizens. This created jealousy, which eventually lead up to the declination of the government. The degeneration slowly built up to the formation of tyranny, oligarchy, and mob-rule, which were controlled by fear and force, not logic and reason like the combined government. Polybius also implied that balance cannot be attained…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    socrates on democracy

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates makes it very clear; he is not a fan of Democracy. He is openly objected to the type of democracy that Athens was running during his adult life. In contrast he was against all forms of government at the time. Socrates believes in the connection between virtue and knowledge. The masses, being uneducated, were therefore not virtuous and not fit to rule. Democracy is the rule of people, and as a group people are very indecisive so we end up trying to have everything we can, but this leads us to not getting what we really need. Democracy precisely means to let all people have power, however it is human nature to not share power. He believes Democracy should be implemented, but it is just the nature of the world to have emperors or kings, so Democracy is just temporary.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizens voted for all legal and executive decisions. The best known and most radical democracy in antiquity was the Athenian democracy. In practice, due to the economic restrictions to political participation, ancient democracies resembled oligarchies in the sense that only the richest citizens, the aristocracy, were able to run for the highest political offices, and they were secretive and controlling of what they presented to be decided by vote in the general assembly. All modern democracies were based on the Athenian democracy, but they differ from it. Modern democracies are representative democracies in which the general public elects a number of political representatives to vote on most political issues, and the general public votes on a limited number of issues presented for vote by their elected representatives. The difference between this and oligarchy, and it is a significant difference, is that the political representatives cannot veto the direct vote of the general public. Otherwise, modern representative democracies can end-up resembling oligarchies very closely, and in some instances even aristocracies. Diverging from Aristotle’s views on the subject, many argue that democracy stands in direct opposition to tyranny, because democracy is the rule of the many by the many for the many, and tyranny is the rule of the many by one for the one.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays