Preview

Three Strikes Your Out

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
591 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Strikes Your Out
Three Strikes and You’re Out

By
Natalie Belyea

May 7, 2013

Prepared for
Mr. Ian Barrimond

The state of California in 1994 passed the “Three Strikes and Your Out” law. This law sentences a third offence felony offender to a mandatory 25-years to life sentence. Although crime rate have dropped in California there are those opponents to the law who feel in certain cases that the sentencing is too harsh.

The benefits of “The Three Strikes and Your Out” law are that it provides a fix for a defective justice system, so that repeat offenders and violent criminals stay in prison. The law provides a very effective prevention after the second conviction. The down side to the law is that if someone is arrested that already has two convictions they are almost guaranteed the cost and time of a trial. Offenders often plea-bargain their first two convictions. The law puts more criminals into an already over crowed and expensive prison system that our hard working Americans pay for.
The literature and discussions with leading criminologists have found that there is little agreement among the researchers about the effectiveness of the Three Strikes law on public safety. Some reports show that a drop in crime in the mid-1990s was due to the Three Strikes law. The Attorney General report stated that though crime rates were dropping nation wide, California’s crime rate dropped even more than those other states. This law is a double edge sword; it’s effective but yet unfair in some conditions.
The Three Strikes law forces longer prison sentences for certain repeat offender. It requires that a person who is convicted of a felony and who has in the past been convicted of one or more violent or serious felonies, receive a sentence enhancement. If someone already has a serious or violent felony, then the sentence for the new felony conviction is twice the terms under law, even if it’s not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    What evidence can help the public with their concerns and ultimate acceptance of changes in the three strikes…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 4: Should juveniles who are arrested three or more times face mandatory incarceration sentences such as those contained in the three-strikes legislation?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three strikes statutes are seen as a way to combat the nation 's crime problem. After Polly Klass was…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    3 Strikes laws demand double the standard prison term for a second felony conviction, and mandatory sentences of 25 years to life for a 3rd conviction. For an example of this law in action, lets look at a few hypothetical criminals. Our first villain, lets call him Jerry, is an 18 year old caucasian male from Olympia. He is convicted of armed robbery after holding up a convenience store. After agreeing to a plea bargain, Jerry is sentenced to 2 years in state prison and 3 years probation. Most would agree this is a fair sentence. 6 years later, Jerry is charged with 2nd degree assault after breaking another mans jaw in a fight at a minor league baseball game in Tacoma. His friend Tom is also charged with 2nd degree assault after hitting an innocent bystander with a beer bottle during the same fight. Tom receives a 3 year sentence, followed by a years probation. After a jury trial, Jerry is sentenced to 8 years in prison for the same crime. Why, you may ask. The answer is simple. 3 strikes laws demand that because Jerry has a previous felony conviction, although more than half a decade previous and completely unrelated, he is subject to double the standard sentence for his “2nd Strike”.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Strike Law is a law that was passed in 1994. The purpose of this law is to require the defendant extra time for their new felony because of a crime that was committed in the past. This law have been active for several years and it came with a lot of pros and cons. In this paper I will give my view on what I think the good and the bad is for this law.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Three Strikes Law is too undeveloped and disproportionate to be considered a fair punishment for criminals. In this law, someone who is a repeat offender and gets arrested for shoplifting can end up receiving a larger prison sentence than someone who has committed murder. Three strikes also leaves no room for rehabilitation, as rehab…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B. 'The California Legislature is to be commended for its stance on crime. Not for their 'get tough ' policies such as the 'Three Strikes ' law but for their enactment of a little known section of the Penal Code entitled the 'Community Based Punishment Act of 1994. ' (Senator Quentin Kopp, Time Magazine Feb 14, 1996)…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the practice of imposing longer prison sentences on repeat offenders than on first-time offenders who commit the same crime is nothing new in American states (since the 19th Century, New York State has had a Persistent Felony Offender law that continues to this date), these sentences were not always held mandatory in every case, and judges exercised much more discretion in what the length of the sentence would be. In 1993, Washington State passed the first true "three strikes" law, which contained virtually no exceptions to this law. One year later, California adopted this law (approved by referendum in that state) and the “three strikes” idea spread swiftly to the other states. By 2004, 26 states of the 50 U.S. states as well as the federal government had laws which resembled or otherwise satisfied the basic requirements to be called a "three strikes" law - primarily, a person convicted of a third felony conviction will be sentenced to life in prison, with no possibility of parole until a long period of time, most commonly 25 years, has been served.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to The American Heritage Dictionary, law is defined as the principles and regulations established in a community by some authority and applicable to its people, whether in the form of legislation or of custom and policies recognized and enforced by judicial decision or the controlling influence of such as rules that the condition of society brought about by their observance (481). However, there is a very unique law that borrowing its name from baseball. Which is the three strikes law, it imposed mandatory minimum sentences for individuals who have been convicted of three felony crimes that were committed on three separate occasions. According to Bazelon, the ideology behind the three strikes law is that individuals who commit more than two felonies are chronically criminal and therefore pose a threat to society. Three strikes law advocates, as a fair punishment and a benefit to society, thus view incarcerating these individuals for lengthy prison terms or the rest of their lives (2). In 1974, Texas was first state that enacted three strikes law. Following year, Washington enacted and California, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, North Dakota enacted in 1994. Furthermore, in 1995 and 1996, fifteen states are also enacted the three strikes law (Crane 1). As crime and violence increased in the United States, citizens began to feel powerless. Terrorized in their own neighborhoods by criminals, who go in and out of the legal system, people began to believe there was no justice for them. Ironically, many people feared so much the gangs, drug dealers, pushers, and hustlers of the streets. An enormous outcry came about, requesting the government to fix the increasing crime rate. The answer to this dilemma came in the form of the three strikes law. According to Jabali-Nash, proposition 184, also known as the three strikes law, was passed on November 9, 1994. The proposal had portion of the population supporting it at the ballot boxes. With a 75…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the process of knowing whether or not sentencing laws deter crime, that fact in the United States (U.S.), in the last 20 years, shows that longer sentences do not deter crime. After years of increased sentences and drain on the state’s treasury, we need to acknowledge this fact. In New York and many other states, the “tough” policies have produced a combination of large-scale prison overcrowding without meaningful reductions in our crime rate.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States prison system is not a suitable place for nonviolent drug offenders. The high rate of recidivism is caused by one thing and one thing only, prison sentences. Nonviolent drug offenders will have no choice other than to socialize with other inmates, some who have committed irreprehensible crimes, thereby greatly increasing their chance of becoming violent. The population of prisons in the United States is on a steady rise. One way to stop this is by reevaluating the three strikes law, because the proof that this law discourages repeat offenders is simply not there.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “lock ‘em up” approach is generally considered to encompass three techniques: “preventative detention, incapacitation, and mandatory sentencing” (Walker, pg. 132). On an intuitive level, they are going to have considerable impact on reducing and controlling crime. In actual application, however, they do not. In some instances, they may even have negative impacts in other areas. For example, they can result in racial disparity or they can be unnecessarily harsh by their application.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in my generation I have noticed a huge amount of incarcerations that I’ve seen publicly on television and in the media. The Smarter Sentencing Act does not repeal any federal mandatory minimum sentences, but instead reduces prison costs and populations by creating a fairer, less costly minimum terms for nonviolent drug offenders (). The 4 main things it will do will be to save billions spent on incarcerating nonviolent drug offenders, save expensive prison beds for more dangerous offenders, remedy a long-standing racial injustice and strengthen black communities, and address over-criminalization ().…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The history of Mandatory Minimum sentencing laws date back to the founding of this country, the idea of swift and certain punishment has always been popular among the public and lawmakers. However, throughout time it has never accomplished its intended goal to eliminate a particular crime. Today’s mandatory minimum sentencing laws require automatic prison terms for those who are convicted of certain federal and state crimes. Some acts we will go over are mostly those established throughout the 1980’s. During this time several acts came into effect and are known as the Comprehensive Crime Control Act, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act, and the Omnibus Anti-Drug Abuse Act. Today many argue that these laws to harsh and need to be revised.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offenders who convict of three violent crimes be sentenced to life in prison without parole. Writer Stolzenberg Lisa in this article gives us the perspective of California’s three-strike law adopted in 1994. Compared to other states, with their own legislation, California has the toughest mandated sentencing because of the higher percentage of violent offenders. The reason why California uses this form is to lengthen sentences and deter crime, especially crime committed by repeated offenders. On the other hand, Lisa argues that policy of transmitting more people to prison and increasing sentences has been a complete deficiency in reducing felonies “they estimated that a fully implemented three-strikes law would reduce serious felonies between 22% and 34% and that about one-third of this reduction would be for violent crimes such as murder, rape, or aggravated assault.” (Lisa,1997) This show the measures have been tried in the past decade, but they have had no observable fallout on crime because more prisons have never been an effective solution to the crime problem. Due to more crime rates, the state reformed its constitutional law in which those who seriously commit a crime or felony should be mandated under the three-strike law. In the case of robbery, the judge gives any offender to serve in jail for the small amount of time.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays