Preview

Three Strikes Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
488 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Strikes Law
Shaina Piermattei
Professor Minor
Theory of Communications
14 November, 2011

Three Strikes Law

The Three Strikes Law is similar to its names origin, like in baseball, after a person 's third felony, or strike, prison time is drastically enforced and can even end up being up to 25 years to life. The first two strikes are counted namely as serious or violent crimes, however, once a third strike is enforced, the seriousness of the crime can actually be much less. For example, nonviolent crimes such as shoplifting or even forgery can count as the third strike that sends one to jail for 25 years to life. In addition to three strikes, even second strike offenses are punished harshly as well. Say someone were to commit their second felony, the sentencing for the criminal is actually doubled. The Three Strikes Law is actually known in most states as habitual offender laws. Most people are still unaware the law exists, “Though the practice of increasing penalties for repeat offenders is fairly common and well-established, the modern Three Strikes Law first appeared in the early 1990s in Washington State"(Totalcriminaldefense.com). California followed suit shortly after Washington, most believe this was due to a convict who had already committed two felonies then when he was released committed murder. California is actually one of the strictest states when it comes to enforcing the Three Strikes Law. According to attorney, Sarah Garvey, about one in four inmates in the overcrowded California state prison system is a "striker"(Shouselaw.com).There still is no evidence that this law has reduced crime in anyway. The Three Strikes Law is too undeveloped and disproportionate to be considered a fair punishment for criminals. In this law, someone who is a repeat offender and gets arrested for shoplifting can end up receiving a larger prison sentence than someone who has committed murder. Three strikes also leaves no room for rehabilitation, as rehab



Cited: 1. "Understanding the Three Strikes Law." Total Criminal Defense. 14 Nov. 2011. Web. http://www.totalcriminaldefense.com/overview/three-strikes-law.aspx 2.Garvey, Sarah. "California Three Strikes Law." S House Law Group.14 Nov. 2011. Web. http://www.shouselaw.com/three-strikes.html 3."Three Strikes Law." CGA. 14 Nov. 2011. Web. Jan. 2009. http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/rpt/2009-R-0006.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 4: Should juveniles who are arrested three or more times face mandatory incarceration sentences such as those contained in the three-strikes legislation?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my personal opinion I strongly agree with the pro position of three strike laws and even though it has its pros and cons. The three strike laws were implemented with a really good intention and that is to give our society a piece of mind not having to deal with ongoing crimes. Removing repeated offender, from the streets for good. Well creating an equal sentencing guideline and helping our justice system move at a faster pace. The main purpose of the laws is to highly increase the punishment of those convicted of more than two serious crimes. As well as sending a message to the offenders that they will be sentence to life in prison if they continue to maintain a same lifestyle, the three strike law motivates them to straighten up their…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    3 Strikes laws demand double the standard prison term for a second felony conviction, and mandatory sentences of 25 years to life for a 3rd conviction. For an example of this law in action, lets look at a few hypothetical criminals. Our first villain, lets call him Jerry, is an 18 year old caucasian male from Olympia. He is convicted of armed robbery after holding up a convenience store. After agreeing to a plea bargain, Jerry is sentenced to 2 years in state prison and 3 years probation. Most would agree this is a fair sentence. 6 years later, Jerry is charged with 2nd degree assault after breaking another mans jaw in a fight at a minor league baseball game in Tacoma. His friend Tom is also charged with 2nd degree assault after hitting an innocent bystander with a beer bottle during the same fight. Tom receives a 3 year sentence, followed by a years probation. After a jury trial, Jerry is sentenced to 8 years in prison for the same crime. Why, you may ask. The answer is simple. 3 strikes laws demand that because Jerry has a previous felony conviction, although more than half a decade previous and completely unrelated, he is subject to double the standard sentence for his “2nd Strike”.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would be safe to assume that most individuals agree that those who commit crimes must deal with the consequences of their law breaking actions. Despite efforts to reduce crime by the traditional form of punishment through incarceration, some criminals continue to live felonious lives. This not only poses a problem on their behave but also that of the communities in which they live and are offending. The state of California was determined to conjure a method of reducing the recidivism of violent felons. Consequently, California legislatures agreed to install a plan of action, which evolved, to their “three strikes” sentencing law. This creation of the “three strikes” fundamentally means that those who are found guilty of serious felonies for a third time are at risk of being locked up for 25 years to life. Life is all about consequences and those who choose to disobey the law must own up to and face their punishments. Criminals who are repeatedly in and out of the justice system need to be taken seriously, and punished as such.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Three Strike Law is a law that was passed in 1994. The purpose of this law is to require the defendant extra time for their new felony because of a crime that was committed in the past. This law have been active for several years and it came with a lot of pros and cons. In this paper I will give my view on what I think the good and the bad is for this law.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Strikes Rule

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    On June 29, 1992, in Fresno, California, Kimber Reynolds was approached on the street by two men on a motorcycle. One of the men tried to steal her purse, and when she resisted, the other pulled a .357 Magnum out of his waistband and shot her in the side of the head. She died 26 hours later. After a couple days of searching, they found the location of the gunman, Joe Davis. Davis was a 25-year-old confirmed methamphetamine user repeatedly convicted and jailed for offenses including armed robbery, auto theft, and illegal drug usage. Davis had only been released from prison a mere 3 months before Kimber’s shooting. As police surrounded Davis’ apartment, Davis stepped out and started firing at the police, eventually being shot to death by police officers. The accomplice was found not long after. His name is Douglas Walker, a 26-year-old repeat offender as well. He plead guilty in court. Walker received the maximum sentence possible, a 9-year stint. With good behavior, though, he’d be back on the Fresno streets in only half of that time. Reynolds knew the law needed to change to protect the non-criminals in America, and so he, personally, confronted the California state legislature. His proposal was that a second-time offender faced a sentence double that of what a single-time offender would face, and a third-time offender received twenty-five years to life. It was met coldly and almost immediately quashed. Nothing new about the law arose until October 1, 1993, when a 12-year-old girl, Polly Klaas, was kidnapped from her own slumber party by 39-year-old Richard Davis, a criminal with a lengthy history of violent crime. Davis had encountered police coincidentally about two months later, and it is believed that soon after, he murdered Polly by strangulation and buried…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three strikes raises important questions about how sentencing laws need to achieve public safety. How are such laws made? Who do they target? And why did Michael Reynolds and Mark Klaas start out as allies and end up as bitter political rivals.…

    • 5293 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As violent crime continued to rise, the public demanded harsher and more definite sentences. The rehabilitative concept was called into question as to its effectiveness, leading to the birth of the determinate sentencing structure. The determinate sentencing structure is that which gives an offender a fixed term of incarceration. This type of structured sentencing reform can be used to deter potential offenders and incapacitate dangerous offenders. For example, bringing drug paraphernalia into a prison requires a fixed prison sentence of two years. Judges, in such a case, do not have discretion when the statute “determines” what the sentence is to…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research gather by the Journal “Impacts of “three Strikes and You’re Out” on Crime Trends in California and Throughout the United States” shows that the Three Strikes law may not have such a large impact on the reduction of crime. In fact, the effects of this policy may not even come from the incarceration of third strikers, but from its deterrent effect. Statistics gathered in the years shortly after the law was implemented showed that California had a “20.2% total crime drop and the 13.8% decline in violent crime from 1994 to 1997 (Lungren, 1997), and a 46% decline in the index crime rate from 1992 to 2002.”(SagePub) Overall in the Three Strikes states, crime dropped almost 3% more rapidly than in the years prior to the implementation of…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First focusing on the state of California prison, they were forced back in 2011 to release about 3,000 inmates. An article wrote by Derek Gilna says “A government study revealed that overcrowding in the federal prison system worsened over the five-year period from 2006 through 2011, affecting facilities of all security levels.” California has the three-strikes laws, as an offender if you were caught three times committing the same crime the third time you are sentence to be in jail for a longer period of time. This might sound like a good plan until you have offenders that are serving five to ten years for petty theft, prostitution, reckless driving or trespassing. These are petty crime that can be handle with charges and probations. Yet, in…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nonviolent Offenders

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Offenders who might be eligible for diversion programs. This group is basically those people in jail or prison who may safely be diverted to alternative programs and services. They generally are second or third time offenders who have failed on probation and have been convicted of a number of non-violent offenses. Under California 's "three strike 's law", they could face life imprisonment if their first two felonies are violent and/or if the third felony is…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays