Preview

Three Reasons Why Cloning Should Not Be Allowed

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
642 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Reasons Why Cloning Should Not Be Allowed
Leidy Escobar 11/15/2012

Three Reasons Why Cloning Should Not Be Allowed

Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of a human being. Cloning has recently become a possibility that seems much more realistic nowadays in society than a long time ago. Even though some people think that cloning should be allowed, I am not in agreement with this because of these three reasons: When people want to create a clone I believe they are trying to imitate God, it goes against ethics, and it also can cause health problems.
There are people who believe that cloning should be allowed. One of the reasons is that parents can have control in their reproductive lives. Children should be valued by who they are, and parents don’t have the right to choose the physical characteristics or even take away the identities of their children. As a result, cloned children will see themselves as an object but not as a person. Another reason is the possibility of cloning organs to save lives. This argument I see it very insufficient because cloned organs can have some defects and cause some damage in a person’s body and organism if the procedure is not well done. Furthermore most scientists agree that research cloning for medical research is not needed as a source of embryonic stem cells these can be obtained from embryos generated by in vitro fertilization.
On the other hand, I think that cloning should be banned. In other words we do not have the right or power to create new lives. Furthermore, it affects to ethics is because it is intolerable. According to Mr. Per Anderson, a teacher of religion at Concordia College in Minnesota, cloning is not good because it changes the structure of nature. If this technique were attempted in humans, it would risk miscarriages in the mother and severe developmental problems in the child. Also, religion is affected, as well. The Vatican feels strongly against cloning because God is the only creator of lives and souls

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is cloning? Cloning, a process in which genetically identical copies of a biological entity are produced. The copy is referred to as a clone because it has the same makeup as the original thing it was cloned from. Cloning can happen naturally through asexual reproduction where a one parent cell splits itself into two identical daughter cells. In humans cloning can happen naturally when a fertilized egg splits making two embryos with almost identical genetic makeup, although they do not look genetically identical to either parent. Artificial cloning in animals, or reproductive cloning, is what is erroneous since it can damage the original or the clone permanently. There are other forms of artificial cloning such as gene cloning and therapeutic…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of an existing, or previously existing, human being or growing cloned tissue from that individual (Cloning Fact Sheet). Scientists remove the nucleus, which contains the genetic material, from an egg. The genetic material from an adult somatic cell is removed and placed in the egg. It now has a complete set of genes. The egg is placed in a petri dish to allow it to develop into an embryo, which is placed into a surrogate mother to continue to grow and develop into a baby (Genetic Science Learning Center). This technique is called nuclear transfer or nuclear transplantation because they transfer the nucleus from one cell to another (Kilner). Therapeutic cloning is a technique of human…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Researches and scientists may use cloned embryos to find cures for diseases. However, according to Boffey, the “risk that a cloned baby would be born with birth defects or face medical problems”is extremely high. It goes against all ethics to produce children that may be disabled for their whole lives. The idea of cloning children for the sole purpose of finding cures is similar to the idea of having children for the sole purpose of helping cure an older sibling. Both of these concepts involve selfishly bringing a child into the world and possibly ruining his life. These scientific ideas go against moral and ethical codes and will “turn children into manufactured products rather than independent…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    revloution

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think cloning is bad because if we genetically alter clones and develop people to be perfect beings then there will not be diversity and there will be problems because people will be choosing selected genes to make the perfect child. Everyone will have the same bodies and diseases will kill a lot of humans because they are all the same. Cloning is also a big moral issue because the concept of making people could interfere or disrupt people’s beliefs and religions.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning could provide many advantages but includes many risks like the possibility to start a whole new war. An army of clones could be created which means other counties would have to follow. Cloning should still be legal because it could help people even this risk.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would have a significant effect on the religious community as it may conflict with religious beliefs. For example many religious groups believe that human clones would not have a soul and that removing the nucleus from the cell is murder. Religious group may also be opposed to the fact the human cloning would mean gay/lesbian couples would be able to have children together. It can also be thought that cloning is like "playing God." The clergymen believe that people do not have to right to change God 's will which what they think cloning will do.People in society in general may also think human cloning is unethical, unnatural and a violation against human…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Science Gone Wrong

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With so many enhancements in medical science, cloning is slowly but surely looking like it could be in the near future. However, is it really an option that should be considered as a way to extend human life? There are a number of negatives involved with reproductive cloning. According to udemy.com, “95% of animal cloning has ended in failure due to genetic defects, and cloning is considered unsafe because of it” (Quinonez). Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus written by Mary Shelley goes along very well with the statement that science can go too far. In the book Victor Frankenstein created a monster that he later regretted creating him. Many believe that cloning is against God’s wishes because the clones would be created by man. Man would be playing God and create people that are unable to feel and empathize. There is also the belief that these clones would be created without a soul. Whatever peoples view on cloning…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning is often a very controversial topic. Some people think it would be good while others are against it. I think cloning can be positive. Especially cloning food. While there are many who disagree there are a lot who agree. People are often misinformed about cloning. The pros outweigh the cons in most situations that have to do with cloning.There are many aspects of cloning that can be positive like cloning food and endangered species.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two different types of cloning, each with different goals and benefits. The first is therapeutic cloning which produces stem cells and even organs for transplantation. Instead of waiting on a donor list and hoping that an organ will arrive that would save your life, organs could be mass produced creating a perfect match that would be readily available. The second type of cloning is reproductive cloning. Reproductive cloning refers to allowing the clone to be created and live a regular life with the exact same DNA as the donor. Currently therapeutic cloning is being looked at as the first logical reason to clone. "Some types of disease and injury have no potential therapies other than those involving embryonic stem cells(cp #26, 3)." If perfected cloning could save thousands of lives and extend the life expectancy for the entire world. "The medical and scientific benefits of therapeutic cloning are so great…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Human Cloning Wrong

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages

    According to them it is important to mark the difference between "reproductive" cloning and "therapeutic" cloning. While the first one is a kind of asexual reproduction in which "a child produced by cloning would be the genetic duplicate of an existing person" (Reproductive Cloning Arguments Pro and Con, 2006), the other one deals with the production of human embryos by taking genetic material from an adult 's cell and put it inside an empty egg cell, and then these experts defend that this new cell will open the doors to the developement of medical treatements (Q&A: Therapeutic human cloning, 2000). In this way, these supporters focus principally on the production of organs or tissues created through cloning that replace or repare the original ones depending on the degree of damage in which they are; in other words, they believe therapeutic cloning to be beneficial. It is argued that in this way these copied organs do not have the possibility to be rejected by the body of the affected person, therefore, thanks to this, illnesses such as Alzheimer 's disease, Parkinson 's disease, diabetes, heart failure or degenerative joint disease among other problems could be solved if human cloning were accepted to be developed, instead of being taken from the most negative perspective towards the possible impacts on society (Smith, 2002). It is also argued that human…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, human cloning could lead to faster medical cures, a higher overall quality of life, and even longer life spans ("Pros and Cons of Human Cloning"). Second, all incurable diseases and the weight of the dying is promised to be cured to be cured by human cloning. Third, if they clone a human being, they can use them to help cure liver failure, kidney failure, and bone marrow also know as leukemia (Smith) Last, human cloning doesn’t create embryos it creates offsprings, that will be a normal human (Weldon). This is why people think that human cloning should not be…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Cloning Be Banned

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A further reason why cloning should not be banned is that thousands of lives are saved from cloning human cells, tissue or organs. Regenerative medicine, a growing scientific field, allows this cloning to take place. Cloning human body parts guarantees a genetic match to prevent organ rejections and doesn’t require drugs that lower the body’s immune response. If human cloning is fully banned, this type of research would be stopped and a lot of lives would be lost.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics