Preview

Three Main Ideas From The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Three Main Ideas From The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx
Discuss three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto.

The Communist Manifesto was written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, and it was originally published in German in 1848. The basic premise of the publication is to demonstrate the difference between class structures, primarily the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. It is a hugely influential book, and it is still relevant in today’s modern society.

1. Bourgeois and Proletarians
Throughout history, the discord between the bourgeoisie and the proletarians has been constant. The bourgeoisie were capitalists. They were middle class and they gained power with their education and wealth. The proletarians were of a lower class, who had to earn their living by manual labour.
We can see the clear
…show more content…
Proletarians and Communists
Marx believes the communists to be one of “the most advanced and resolute section of the working-class parties of every country”. He concludes this to be true because the communists do not separate the middle class and the working class. The communists wish to demolish the bourgeoisie and to form the proletariat into a class. Although the communists are believed to be quite similar to the proletariat, there are two main differences. They bring together the shared interests of the proletariat and they always speak for the overall movement.
Communists wish to demolish the bourgeoisie and to form the proletariat into a class. However, they also want to eliminate the bourgeois property. Labour does not create any property for labourers, it simply creates capital. It is an exploitation of labour. Capital is the result of a combined effort from all members of society. There are many opponents to these ideas; such as getting rid of private property will cause a universal laziness, and that a loss of culture would
…show more content…
They started writing pamphlets on the modern bourgeois society to arouse sympathy for themselves. As expected, they were not taken seriously after the people saw their coat of arms. The socialists had apparently forgotten their past crimes; their exploited labour of men. The second part of the reactionary socialism is petty-bourgeois socialism. A new petty-socialism has formed in countries where modern civilization has fully-developed. Their main aim is to restore the old system. The third and final section of the reactionary socialism is German or “True” socialism. The socialist writing from France spread to Germany, but their social conditions did not. It was considered to be nothing more than literature because it didn’t represent the proletariat needs. It was somewhat considered to have no reality to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to the Marxism theory, the proletariat are being exploited by the bourgeoisie as they own the means of production which indicates that they are the basis of the whole society and they control everything in it including the family. This kind of system could be seen as a capitalist society which means it makes the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary principles of communist is that capitalism is characteristically awful and represented a risk to the common laborers. Meanwhile, “The capitalists believed there should be a free economy in which private individuals made most decisions” (Brookioh, 2012). The communists see every single entrepreneur country as conceivable foes. As indicated by them, capitalism will in the end crush itself and it is their obligation to help it along. They deny participation amongst themselves and capitalist countries ideologically.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As described in the Communist Manifesto, there was a division of classes that were between the proletariats that were the wageworkers and were used for labor purposes, and the bourgeoisie who were considered the capitalist class and the ones who were at fault for exploitation of the proletariats. The writing in the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, after many years has a form in which it resonates in contemporary society. Having different types of social and working classes has become more relevant throughout society and has caused for issues to arise. Although the ways they are perceived and named have changed throughout the years in different locations, the existence of these classes is still consistent throughout. There…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Communist overall believe in equality this thought was first proposed by two German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engles. These two men came together and wrote the book known today as “The Communist Manifesto”. In this book they both expressed the many views and liberalities of communism. They conveyed the idea of correspondence by explaining that the proletariat one day will rise…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto to hopefully give some kind of guidance to his fellow workers or proletarians. It was to offer education as to their exploitation as a worker in a capitalistic society and the means to change it. When this was written it shook the social and economic worlds. It did so probably because their was some truth in what he wrote and dared to bring to light.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx then goes into the first part of the body of his manifesto entitled "Bourgeois and Proletarians." In this part, he goes into how society started communal but then became more unequal as time went on. Systems such as Feudalism, Mercantilism, and Capitalism benefited from the use of exploitation. He first introduces the idea that economic concerns of a nation drive history, and that the struggle between the rich bourgeoisie and the hard working proletariat would eventually lead to Communism. He goes on and on about how the bourgeois have always got what they wanted. Marx reflected more on the negatives committed by the bourgeois than the positives. He states the bourgeoisie "has agglomerated population, centralized means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands." (Marx, p.8) He then describes the proletarians, or the labor class, and how they were formed, how they have suffered, and how they must overcome their struggles. Marx declares that this “dangerous class,” the social scum, that passively rotting mass thrown off by the lowest layers of old society, may, here and there, be swept into the movement by a proletarian revolution." (Marx, p.15) This began an inevitable revolution where the proletariats take over and dethrone the bourgeoisie.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Communist Manifesto, one of the world's most influential political pieces was first published on February 21, 1848. Commissioned by the communist league and written by communist theorist Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the Communist Manifesto set out the leagues program and purpose. The widespread inequity in the distribution of valuable resources created a political, social, and economic climate perfect for the introduction of Marx and Engels' Manifesto. The work suggested a counter-hegemonic course of action. Marx and Engels were deeply moved by the disparity in the living conditions between two classes of people, the "bourgeois" and "proletariat." They argued that the far smaller bourgeois class held a position of power—a hegemonic control—over the far larger proletariat class. The Manifesto attempted to re-dress that disparity by invoking a proletarian revolution to overthrow capitalism and, eventually, bring about a classless society. In the United States, employment workers in the nineteenth century were feeling increasingly insecure about their jobs, and the unemployed expected little help from the federal government. This resulted in fifteen million unemployed Americans, which, in turn, opened the gateway to widespread unrest among the working class (wikipedia.com). Although, Marx and Engels believed that the principles of the Communist Manifesto could not apply to American society, some Americans seized the ideology. It was "the perfect storm" and the ideology easily gained momentum starting with the labor-unions, moving past the motives to overthrow the ruling upper class, end inequality in gender and finally make general and social improvements. Thus the communist manifesto played a great role in American society by setting a precedent in the nineteenth century.…

    • 3050 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They took power from these people and finally the society is divided into two separate classes directly facing each other; bourgeois and proletarians. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 2) Now, according to Karl Marx, it's the time for the proletarians to take power from the bourgeois and create a new world order. In the document, Karl Marx also argued that in the process of doing their job in wiping out the feudal system, bourgeois created the system that will lead to their own collapse, which is full of exploitation and unequal distribution of wealth. (The Communist Manifesto, p. 4) Hence, like every time when there is a strong divide between classes in the society, it is the time for a revolution to occur. It is the necessary step for the society to progress further, and it can only be attained by "the forcibly overthrow of all existing conditions." (The Communist Manifesto, p.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl characterized two main conflicts between class, the capitalist (upper class) who owned the means of production and proletariat (working class) who work but does not owns the means of production but sell their labour power to bourgeoisie (middle class) in return for wages.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Communist Manifesto

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The radicals discuss that the exploitation of one class by another is the major factor that motivates force behind all historical developments. The Manifesto argues that the development of the proletariat appropriating property is inevitable and that capitalism is inherently unstable. Throughout the four sections of the Manifesto, the reader gets to view the relationships between the Proletarians and the Bourgeoisie and the Communists and the proletarians. The reader is informed on the previous socialist literature throughout the third section. The final section discusses the relationship between the Communists and other parties. The source offers evidence by giving direct insight on the unjust actions that were taking place. For example, Friedrick himself observed firsthand the exploitation of blue collar workers under the ruling class in factories, as his father sent him to represent their family in its textile business. The authors, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, assume that the division of labor has exploited proletarians where they have been stripped of their identity due to the advent of 'extensive machinery' and so man 'becomes an appendage of the machine.' Marx and Engels also assumed that once the development of the industry has increased, the proletarians will unite and voice their struggles over reduced wages by forming a trade union. Throughout this source, we see the perspective of the proletarian…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The proletariat are the workers in society and the bourgeoisie are the ‘affluent’ business owners and doctors and lawyers of society. Karl Marx, who was a Marxist and started the movement, said that society has two classes of people and they are the two which have just been mentioned.…

    • 335 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, it was recognized as one of the world's most influential political manuscripts. The book contained five chapters including introduction: Bourgeois and Proletarians, Proletarians and Communists, Socialist and Communist Literature, and Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Existing Opposition Parties. It briefly tells that proletariat needs to eliminate the private ownership of the means of production and the bourgeois’ order to create a classless society, and how the capitalist society of the time would eventually be replaced by socialism and then finally by…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays