Preview

Thoreau Vs. Martin Luther King Jr.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
422 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thoreau Vs. Martin Luther King Jr.
In the great span of human history there have been the few to rise up against the common ideals and bring forth innovative creations that changed the course of humanity. They don’t have to be professionals, highly educated, or from wealthy, noble families. They need only the drive to fulfill a purpose, prove a point, and change lives. Henry David Thoreau, a well-noted polymath of the 1800s, and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., a pivotal African-American activist, spoke about the necessity for change in their time in influential ways. In Thoreau’s essay, “Resistance to Civil Government,” he responds to the Mexican-American War and slavery. Believing that the government is futile, he argues that those working for the government are machines following …show more content…
The “bad check, a check which has come back marked ‘insufficient funds,’" he proposes, is referring to the Declaration of Independence, being as blacks were not near as free as this document guaranteed. His speech was a demand for the treatment his people deserved and is one that is still honored today for its bravery and impact. In the search of justice and change, both Thoreau and King used their powerful words to create a spark to light the movement for a better nation. Thoreau sought to make men think for themselves and not blindly follow a government’s rule just because they deem it correct. King addressed the government as well, but to help gain his own freedom and that of millions of blacks around the country that still, years after Thoreau’s time, had not been freed physically or emotionally from the chains of the white man. Thoreau and King were two of many to create a platform of discussion for each of their causes. They inspired others to rise up against the norm, and what everyone was assuming was right. Among humans, there might be a majority that believes what they are living through might be wrong, but might not have the courage to speak up about it. However, it takes people such as Thoreau and King to voice their opinions and make people think it is important to want a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now. But such was the case, they think, in the Revolution of '75. If one were to tell me that this was a bad government because it taxed certain foreign commodities brought to its ports, it is most probable that I should not make an ado about it, for I can do without them. All machines have their friction; and possibly this does enough good to counter-balance the evil. At any rate, it is a great evil to make a stir about it. But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer. In other words, when a sixth of the population of a nation which has undertaken to be the refuge of liberty are slaves, and a whole country is unjustly overrun and conquered by a foreign army, and subjected to military law, I think that it is not too soon for honest men to rebel and revolutionize. What makes this duty the more urgent is that fact that the country so overrun is not our own, but ours is the invading army. (Henry David Thoreau)…

    • 2666 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two different writers, Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, argue that society is not at its finest and that every man has the responsibility to impact change and every many has the power to do so, only if man is an extremist for the greater good. King was a reverend but more importantly he was a dominant voice for thousands of persecuted people during the civil rights movement. From King expressing his knowledge and acting on them, he was obliged and jailed (he was obliged to jail?) within King's cell he composed a letter entitled “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. (transition?) Thoreau was a philosopher who contained all the qualities of a transcendentalist. Much time before King’s letter, Thoreau fabricated a response to when…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr. King was able to inspire people to take action by providing a strong voice for the people he desired to help. Dr. King was able to give motivational and charismatic speeches to a mass number of people who were tired of being mistreated. As a result of his speeches, the morale and confidence of the African American community was boosted. This influenced many who were sick of the mistreatment they were putting up with and drove them to action while exercising the wise ways of peaceful protest that Dr. King directed them to follow.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history there have been many influential people who advocate for peace. such as thoreau an American writer in early American history. There was Martin luther king jr. a man who doesn’t need an introduction. Same as the second man Gandhi doesn’t need an introduction. Each of these men change a way a nation thinks. Thoreau came first leading the way for Gandhi and King.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Thoreau and King rely heavily on ethos to get their points across. The intended audience of both is similar; a group of people with similar morals as the writers, but who have neglected action for various reasons. King also appeals to pathos, describing the plight of the colored man vividly. King’s audience is largely aware of this situation already, but he uses it to drive them to action rather than simple awareness. On the other hand, Thoreau appeals little to pathos, focusing instead on logic and ethics.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Henry David Thoreau was an activist writer. His essays were philosophical and meant to empower people. His idea of protest against the government and slavery was passive and rational. to do nothing. He thought if everyone refused to participate, the government would have to come to their senses and realize they are wrong.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When encountering injustice and treated less than a human being, it is not difficult for one to speak out against an issue and voice one's mind. Though two different authors writing on different issues both were compelling and perplexing. Dr. King is fed up with not being treated equal, where Thoreau is tired of flaws in American government. Dr. King's letter discusses many tragedies that the black generations have gone through and hopes that things can change. Thoreau's essay exposes flaws in American government…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were the stars, so to speak, of Civil Rights protesting. They are the most famous, and are still heard of frequently throughout History text books and magazine articles. Though they died a while back, their legacy still lives on, to live in a world free of segregation, but they each had different ways of “getting what they want”, and some ways of getting what they want led to the bad memories that people rather not speak about.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two very influential men during the Civil Rights Movement. While they both were fighting for the same things, they had quite different ways of acting upon solving these problems. A lot of people see them as complete opposites, seeing as they had contrasting views on violence versus peace. Most are very familiar with King, seeing as he has his own holiday, but not many people may know what he did or was involved with other than civil rights. Both men were adamant in putting an end to segregation, but Malcolm X is known to have relied on violence to get his point across, instead of peaceful protesting. King and Malcolm X were seen as ideological opposites, and many people describe their characters based on preconceived notions, when in reality, their ideas and views converged in some areas.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” inspired a revolution of men to do what is right. His term: civil disobedience, refers to people protesting unjust laws by refusing to comply with them. This process is not just for any laws and practices but ones that cannot be resolved by the Democratic process. In his time, Thoreau referred to slavery and the Mexican-American War. Thoreau found both of these pieces of history to be hypocritical of the United States moral values. The United States stands for the home of the free when, in fact, they enslaved people. He refused to be a part of the government and He showed his civil disobedience by not paying taxes. He was put in jail for this, saying: “Under a government which imprisons any unjustly,…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his opening paragraph, he declares the bold and audacious statements: ‘[...] government is best which governs least [...]’ (lines 1-2) followed by, ‘[...] government is best which governs not at all [...]’ (line 4). Immediately the audience is—very clearly—exposed to his argument, which has an immense amount of force behind it. This is vital for Thoreau’s argument, as throughout his essay the audience hears a very strong and passionate voice, urging them to feel the same way about the topic, and that they too have been wronged by the government. Alongside Thoreau’s very forceful and powerful tone, a candid and critical tone is present. ‘This American government—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity?’ (lines 18-20). This very prominent line denounces the American government’s rectitude, implying that its partiality has reached to the point where it is just a pattern, and continued to increasingly execute unequitable behaviour. Though his attitude sounds negative and pessimistic, Thoreau does make a petition for action from society with an encouraging tone. ‘[...] I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it...’ (lines 45-48). Here, Thoreau uses ethos, as he knows that every man (and woman) wants to be respected, which then builds motivation for the people to take action against the current unjust government instead of heeding to its indoctrinated…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau vs Dickinson

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When thinking of both philosophy and poems in the transcendentalist era who are the main figures that come up? Two of the main figures Dickinson and Thoreau came up with writing based on nature and life. They wrote similarly, yet quite differently as shown in the following two quotes. “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, discover that I had not lived-Thoreau and “Tell the Truth but tell it slant…The Truth’s superb surprise…With explanation kind The truth must dazzle gradually Or every man be blind.-Dickinson.”…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Almost everyone we meet will have different stances on various subjects. We were all blessed with the ability to think for ourselves and decide what we agree with. Often, this can cause conflict between two parties because their views are so drastically opposite. Martin Luther King, Jr. preached about equality and the desire for peaceful protest. Malcolm X promoted black supremacy and rejected the idea of integration. While Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X agreed that black people should not be treated as lower class citizens, they were different when it came to continuing segregation because of class rank and the backgrounds they came from.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) and John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) were heroes in the era that they shared. These two men gave speeches that forever altered America. These two men were both heroes and champions of their time. A hero is someone who is admired or idealized for courage (Webster). These men were known for their courage and sympathetic attributes, but also for their powerful, strong, yet stern speeches (Jones). The speeches these men gave stole the hearts of the citizens of America with words that spoke about a superior place full of various races, cultures, and traditions (Jones). Martin Luther King and John F Kennedy both wanted change to transpire and to establish peace across America and elaborated so through their speeches on different topics. Both of these speeches, although similar in nature, have many differences including the style with which they were written, the image they each desired…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The subject of Thoreau's “Slavery in Massachusetts” (1854), was on public view when an escaped slave named Anthony Burns was captured in Boston. Thoreau denounced the absurdity of a court in Boston “trying a MAN, to find out if he is not really a SLAVE,” when the question has already been “decided from eternity”. The citizen has no duty to resign his conscience to the state, and may even have a duty to oppose moral legislation such as that which supports ever in the Mexican War. Thoreau concludes “I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is slave's government also”. Slavery could be abolished by “peaceable revolution”, he continues, if people refuse to pay their taxes and clogged the system by going to jail. Although Thoreau advocates nonviolent action in “Resistance to Civil Government,” he later supported the violent actions of John Brown who killed unarmed pro slavery settlers in Kansas, and in 1859 attacked the federal arsenal at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays