Preview

Thomson Parliamentary Debate

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomson Parliamentary Debate
The Georgetown Parliamentary Debate Team is an association of people with a common interest in competitive debate with other universities. The purpose of the Team is to provide an opportunity for its members to learn debating styles and rules, to develop and to practice their skills and techniques with other members of the Team, and compete within the debate league(s) it chooses to participate in. Currently, the Society is a member of, but will not be limited to, the American Parliamentary Debate Association (APDA). The Team shall host one tournament each year, preferably in March.

BOARD POSITIONS
The Executive Board Shall:
Retain the power to create and dissolve committees.
Retain the power to enforce the judging requirement.
Promulgate rules
…show more content…
Promote, defend and enforce the purpose, constitution and best interests of the Society.
Attend personally, appoint a substitute to attend, or proxy votes for all meetings in which the APDA body shall be determining tournament dates or electing national officers.
Oversee the Vice Presidents.
Serve as liaison to alumni of the team and manage the listserv of alumni.
Serve as liaison to other Georgetown University clubs and organizations.
Attend allocation board meetings with the Vice President of Finance when additional funding is needed.
Work with the Vice President of Finance to draft the team budget each semester.
Maintain an independent budget record to be verified periodically with the Vice President of Finance.
Fill in all SAC and CSE paperwork or approve any of said paperwork filled out by another Executive Board member, and ensure it is processed properly and timely.
Send official team emails and approve all emails sent by other Executive Board
…show more content…
The Team shall not officially endorse any candidate for an outside elected office for any organization which is an arm of Georgetown University.
MEMBERS
A member’s status shall be determined by his or her activity in the current semester and the previous semester.
Active members shall meet the following requirements:
Attend at least one APDA-sanctioned tournament each semester.
Members who do not meet the requirements for active membership shall be deemed “inactive”, and shall be ineligible to vote and to attend APDA Nationals or any other title tournaments in which the team participates.
Exceptions shall be made for members who are off campus but still enrolled as undergraduate students at Georgetown University at the discretion of the Executive Board.
When attending tournaments at other schools, members shall respect the rules of the host school.
Case ownership
Members will be required to upload cases which have been run at tournaments funded by the Team to the casebook
Members will retain property claim over cases, and those cases will not be run by any other member without explicit permission from the owner prior to each

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    "College Athletes for Hire, The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA's Amateur Myth" written by Allen L. Sack and Ellen J. Staurowsky. In their book, the authors enlighten the reader on such issues as athletic scholarships, professionalism in college sports, and favoritism for athletes as well as many more important legal, and ethical issues that we as a country need to address. In this paper I will not do a standard book report by simply regurgitating the information I read in their book. Instead I will try my best to give you my opinion of the issues previously mentioned, and finally what the authors feel should be done to remedy this dilemma as well as my own opinion on the matter, but first I will discuss the issues involved in athletic scholarships.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NCAA (National Collegiate Association of Athletics) has many different rules and restrictions for Division 1 student athletes. A lot of these rules are controversial because of some of the NCAA 's own actions. Every year, many student athletes get either suspended or kicked off teams for disorderly conduct, or not abiding by the rules set by the NCAA. The NCAA is, and always has been, sternly against any student athletes receiving any type of profit for anything, unless they are working for it. Along with this, student athletes are not permitted too ever accept any money for participating in a college sport, and if they do this is a major violation and they will have consequences for breaking these rules.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The criterion for the award was set up by the Centenary Student-Athlete Advisory with every athletic team putting forth a nominee. Every nominee is then voted on by all of the student-athletes. Athletes are ineligible to vote on an athlete on their…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sponsorship packages will offer different perks for different levels and types of contributions. Registration will have the potential to increase to the maximum required SYFC team composition requirements by providing scholarship funding for low- income participants. As a charter member of Suncoast Youth Football Conference we are required to meet the minimum and maximum cheerleading and team composition guidelines outlined in the SYFC rule book.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With March Madness dominating the headlines and airwaves, it’s difficult not to admire the passion and effort of these nineteen year old athletes. However, while the marketing of, and revenue from, the tournament continues to grow for the television networks, the NCAA, the participating universities and their coaches, the NCAA athletes participating in it are expressly prohibited from collecting any financial compensation at all whatsoever. There is the argument that NCAA student-athletes should not be paid because of an opportunity provided to pursue a free higher education not given to the general public; but the assertion has several flaws, not the least of which is the extensive time and energy demanded…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Their chief responsibilities include coordinating fundraising activities, enhancing existing fundraising initiatives, developing new and effective fundraising strategies and providing administrative support to the organization regarding setting fundraising goals and similar activities.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title IX Research Paper

    • 1820 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "Appellate court affirms dismissal of gender discrimination lawsuit filed against Miami University by members of disbanded men 's soccer, tennis and wrestling teams" Entertainment Law Reporter. Recent Cases; Vol. 24, No. 8 LexisNexis (January, 2003)…

    • 1820 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    players. They are not. If the National College Athletic Association or NCAA changed their rules,…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most colleges are very strict when it comes to being a part of a group besides academic or a medical program. For example, a college won’t accept you if you’re not bringing in money in any shape or form. Such as playing basketball, or on the swim team. You could have a 4.0, which is a very good gpa and they would still not accept you. They do not want to hear about academics more than sports.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ncaa Ethics Paper

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Dienhart, Tom. "Ethics and recruiting often don 't mix." Sports Publications. Web. 11 Nov. 2009.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The NCAA Compliance Office addresses the issue of improper benefits by stating: “An extra benefit is any special arrangement by an institutional employee or a representative of the institution’s athletic interests (including fans) to provide a student-athlete or the student-athlete’s relative or friend a benefit not expressly authorized by the NCAA legislation.” This rule is not very clear or…

    • 3969 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Student athletes are constantly given rules and regulations that they must follow to be college eligible. One of those regulations is a required education GPA based on the schools division and student body. There are many schools that have allegedly ignored this regulation and allowed athletes that did not meet the requirements to play at the college level. Preferential treatment among student athletes is a major problem for the NCAA.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critics of student athlete privileges suggest that colleges should put education first and by giving athletes “preferential treatment,” it violates the sole purpose of the institution. The schools with attendance policies have a requirement for regular students to be in class a certain amount of time. However, athletes are exempted from those requirements. According to Amy Perko, an academic reform advocate at Knights Commission, her commission has “consistently recommended that athletes be mainstreamed into the same academic requirements other students are subject to, so that athletes be subject to the same admission policy and criteria as other students.” (Schrotenboer1). Some universities have students called “special admits.” These are students accepted into universities even though their grades…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This amendment is overseen by the federal department but is subject to judicial review. The key purpose of this amendment is to have the institution and organization offer activities in a proportion that is the same proportion of that gender’s population that the institution or organization serves. The following cases reviewed, Kelley v. Board of Trustees,35 F.3d 265 (7th Circuit 1994)(Pittman 2008), and Roberts v. Colorado State Board of Agriculture, 998 F.2d 824 (10th Circuit 1993) (Pittman 2008) deal with whether compliance has been met in a sports program. The compliance factors include both sexes have had interests and abilities accommodated when offering sports teams, equally providing supplies, equipment, and time for…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Schools earn "points" for each player eligible at the beginning and end of each semester. For example, a player who is eligible at the beginning and end of each semester during a given academic year earns four "points" (4 for 4). If a player is eligible and is retained after the first semester but does not return for the following fall and is ruled ineligible, his number would be 2 for 4.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays