Preview

Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument Analysis
‘The cosmological argument shows that it is reasonable to believe in God’ How far do you agree? - 15 Mark
Aquinas’ cosmological argument is a theory that is highly credible due it to being very logical and having support from science and common human observation. His theory isn’t based on the spiritual and religious God it is based on the God of classical theism which is why more people may argue that his theory makes it reasonable to believe in God.
Aquinas’ argument gives a very detailed account as to why god actually exists. This detailed account contains ideas that are sensible and are logical which is why in some aspects people may find it tolerable to believe in a God. Aquinas’ rejected the idea of infinite regression which is hugely …show more content…
Some criticise Aquinas for generalising his observations however one could argue that if things within the universe operate in a certain way it isn’t stupid to assume the universe itself works in the same way. Aquinas said that all beings in the universe are an effect that derived from some sort of cause. This theory applies to everything. For example, a baby is an effect and the cause of the baby is its parents mating and eventually reproducing. So taking this observation Aquinas asserted that the universe was caused by something which he labels the first mover which is also addressed as God. Some may find it reasonable to believe in God as Aquinas is providing them with sensible ideas that explain Gods existence. Although these ideas are assumptions they are logical assumptions which show it’s understandable to believe in …show more content…
This theory states that once the universe did begin it must have had a being that sustained it, which is the god of classical theism. Having a scientific theory support Aquinas’ idea helps make it more credible and believable as science works with empirical evidence which makes people more prone to accept it.
There are also many criticisms of the cosmological argument. David Hume argues that any form of knowledge humans have should be based on something they have experienced or witnessed first-hand. Hume goes on to say that Aquinas just like any of the human hasn’t experienced the beginning of the universe or the supposed being that created the universe so Hume argues that Aquinas’ entire argument is based on assumption as opposed to experience and assumptions aren’t credible due to them being based on ideas rather than empirical
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clifford on the Immorality of Religious Belief Without Evidence

    We are looking for evidence god exists, so we turned to an evidential argument in favor of God: the cosmological argument.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    William Lane Craig Analysis
    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    William Lane Craig Analysis

    This argument has been subject to great applause through the religious community for its simplistic and impactful articulation. However the cosmological argument is also opposed by atheists who fail to find substance and empirical evidence within its core.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas Idea Of God: A Comparative Analysis
    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    Aquinas Idea Of God: A Comparative Analysis

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God

    After reviewing McCloskey's article it is clear to say that he wanted to truly appeal to an atheist audience. McCloskey refers to the arguments as "proofs", which means that he is trying to insinuate that these arguments are not scientifically proven and are not based on facts. A proof is a statement that is unquestionable and lead to an end. He also implies that the arguments cannot definitely establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned because this way he can use that term to make the argument that God exists less plausible. Specifically, the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and arguments of design in general cannot be proven and cannot point to an end, but they do provide possible arguments that God does…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Telelogical argument

    St.Thomas Aquinas believed that existence of god could be proven. In his Summa Theologiae Aquinas put forward five proofs (or five ways) for the existence of God:First Way – Argument from Motion Second Way – Causation of Existence Third Way – Contingent and Necessary Objects Fourth Way – The Argument from Degrees and Perfection Fifth Way – The Argument from Intelligent Design.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the cosmological argument for t
    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examine the cosmological argument for t

    The key idea in cosmological arguments is that the world, the universe, and everything in them are dependent on something other than themselves for their existence. In other words, cosmological arguments attempt to justify God's existence on the assumption that nothing can come from nothing, and that God must exist in order for anything to be here.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake

    Thomas Aquinas's argument for the existence of God is a deductive argument. This assessment is based on the nature of the premises in the argument. As discussed during classroom lectures, the argument's premises and conclusion can be translated as evaluate the truth value of the premises and how they support the conclusion.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophical Arguments For The Existence Of God
    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophical Arguments For The Existence Of God

    Evaluate the arguments for the existence of god There are three main philosophical arguments for the existence of god; the Teleological argument (also known as the design argument), made by William Paley, which presents the central idea that the universe is so complex, perfectly designed and purposeful that it must have had an intelligent designer, the Cosmological argument, made by Thomas Aquinas, which is based on the main idea that everything has a starting point so an uncaused god must have made/caused the universe, and the (entirely a priori) Ontological argument, made by Anselm, based on the main idea that god is perfect, and that existence is a predicate of perfection so therefore God must be real both in our minds and reality as he…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against The Cosmological Argument
    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Arguments Against The Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological arguments are inductive arguments based on an ‘a posteriori’ premise, which, despite having been introduced many years ago, continue to be prevalent today. An early example of the argument is within ‘Timaeus’, in which Plato proposed the idea that anything that has been created must be created by a cause. These arguments are intended to prove the existence of the God of Classical Theism by explaining that God must be the first cause of the universe; the being setting the world into motion without doing anything itself. My thesis will postulate that this argument does not necessarily prove God, and, in fact, is rather a large leap of logic – the assumption of God’s existence based on the idea of causation simply seems to be…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis

    Aquinas’s view on the relationship between faith and reason is that they are overlapping. He says that man should use all things he can to learn about God. Aquinas states that there is general revelation and special revelation. General revelation is anything in the world, we use logic to see these. General revelation is reason. Special revelation can be seen through scripture and religion. Special revelation is faith. Aquinas believes that we should use any means we can to learn about God, so it is essential to use both general and special revelation. Through general revelation, he believes that we can use reason to give context to our faith. We can use reason to demonstrate some truths about faith, for example, the fact that God exists. Because you cannot understand everything from reason alone, there is some part of faith that can only be shown by special revelation. Aquinas believes that some things in faith that can be explained by reason and some ideas in reason that can be explained by faith and that is where the two overlap. On the other hand, there are other ideas that only faith can explain or only reason can explain. This is why he has an overlapping view on faith and reason because some ideas over lap and some do…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument for God’s existence differs from both the scriptural and ontological arguments in the way in which humans created it. Rather than looking at logical arguments or religious texts, the cosmological argument was derived because of humanity’s ability to project their need for cause onto the world. The cosmological argument is centered on the way in which we, humans in general, perceive there to be a need for a God due to the existence of the world around us.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    Out of the four arguments for the existence of a God, the Cosmological argument is the most persuasive. For thousands of years, humans have wondered what their purpose on Earth is and how we came to exist. Because of this wondering, many humans have concluded that there is an all-powerful creator who created the universe and everything in it. But, since we cannot see this creator and have no evidence as proof of his existence, there are many people who doubt the existence of an all-powerful creator. There are four main arguments for the existence of God. They are the Teleological argument, the Cosmological arguments, the Ontological arguments, and the Moral arguments. None of them provide objective proof…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ontological Argument Analysis

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument is a philosophical argument in favor of the existence of God based on looking at evidence in the world around us. The arguments aim to persuade us that its conclusion is reasonable. But what is the conclusion that the cosmological wants us to accept? The argument wants us to accept that the cause of the universe is what we call God. From the existence of the world or universe to the existence of a being that brought it into and keeps it in existence.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics