Third Industrial Revolution Essay
Third Industrial Revolution Essay
Topic: To what extent is it correct to say the Third Industrial Revolution is inevitable?
The second industrial revolution is proven that it cannot be continued forever; however, is the third industrial revolution a true solution? In my opinion, I will say that the third industrial revolution is not nessacary inevitable.
First of all, as good as the third industrial revolution sounds, at this current stage and time, it is not feasible. The renewable energy is not really developed nor really getting any attention, hence making it contain a lot of flaws. Since modern people are using way too much energy, a large quantity of energy is required to meet the demand and hence a lot more facilities must be set up to keep up. Setting these facilities up cost a lot of money and (my prediction) not many countries will want or can afford to set these facilities up. (This point will be extended later). The other reason why it is not possible for it to replace fossil feuls is that renewable energy is not reliable. It relays heavily on the wheather condition, rain, sunshine, wind etc. These wheather condition is something that people cannot control, without sunshine, solar pannels cannot generate energy. Without wind, wind mills is not able to generate energy. When there is a drought, hydro electric plants are not capable of generating energy, and the same appilies to all of the renewable energy. This means that the energy generation rate is not constant and cannot be trusted.
Secondly, even though the third industrial revolution states that it benefits everyone, some countries may not like it. The second industrial revolution creates a top down model, which puts the countries that have more elite power (fossil feul) on top and countries that lacks elite power (fossil feuls) on the bottom. Third industrial revolution is planned to shatter this top down model and setting these developed countries back. This benefits the developing countries
Topic: To what extent is it correct to say the Third Industrial Revolution is inevitable?
The second industrial revolution is proven that it cannot be continued forever; however, is the third industrial revolution a true solution? In my opinion, I will say that the third industrial revolution is not nessacary inevitable.
First of all, as good as the third industrial revolution sounds, at this current stage and time, it is not feasible. The renewable energy is not really developed nor really getting any attention, hence making it contain a lot of flaws. Since modern people are using way too much energy, a large quantity of energy is required to meet the demand and hence a lot more facilities must be set up to keep up. Setting these facilities up cost a lot of money and (my prediction) not many countries will want or can afford to set these facilities up. (This point will be extended later). The other reason why it is not possible for it to replace fossil feuls is that renewable energy is not reliable. It relays heavily on the wheather condition, rain, sunshine, wind etc. These wheather condition is something that people cannot control, without sunshine, solar pannels cannot generate energy. Without wind, wind mills is not able to generate energy. When there is a drought, hydro electric plants are not capable of generating energy, and the same appilies to all of the renewable energy. This means that the energy generation rate is not constant and cannot be trusted.
Secondly, even though the third industrial revolution states that it benefits everyone, some countries may not like it. The second industrial revolution creates a top down model, which puts the countries that have more elite power (fossil feul) on top and countries that lacks elite power (fossil feuls) on the bottom. Third industrial revolution is planned to shatter this top down model and setting these developed countries back. This benefits the developing countries
Citations: 1. "Green Power Gridlock: Why Renewable Energy Is No Alternative." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, n.d. Web. 14 Oct. 2014. 2. "Energy Poverty." IEA -. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2014. 3. "Jeremy Rifkin and The Third Industrial Revolution Home Page." Jeremy Rifkin and The Third Industrial Revolution Home Page. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2014. 4. "Jeremy Rifkin 's Third Industrial Revolution." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2014. 5. "Jeremy Rifkin." Jeremy Rifkin. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Oct. 2014. 6. "The Advantages and Disadvantages of Renewable Energy." Renewable Energy:. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2014. 7. "Disadvantages of Alternative Energy." Benefits of Recycling. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2014.