Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Thinking Critically with Psychological Science (Chapter 1 )

Powerful Essays
1672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thinking Critically with Psychological Science (Chapter 1 )
THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Chapter 1
SQ3R
(Survey, Questions, Read, Retrieve, Review)

QUESTIONS:

THE NEED FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
1-1: How do hindsight bias, overconfidence, and the tendency to perceive order in random events illustrate why science-based answers are more valid than those based on intuition and common sense?
Scientific inquiry can help us sift reality, from illusion. Feelings, intuition, overconfidence, and our natural tendency to perceive the outcome usually based on how we interpret a given situation. Three phenomena- hindsight bias, judgmental overconfidence, and our tendency to perceive patterns in random events illustrate why we cannot rely solely on intuition and common sense. By putting observant data into something that we can record will give us a better concept of reality.

1-2: How do the scientific attitude’s three main components relate to critical thinking?
CURIOUS, SKEPTICAL AND HUMBLE
The smart thinker asks “Does it work? When put to the test, can its predictions be confirmed?” To sift reality from fantasy, sense from non-sense, requires a scientific attitude: being skeptical but not cynical, open but not gullible. Psychologist approach the world of behavior with a curious skepticism, persistently asking two questions: “What do you mean?” and “How do you know?”
Humility along with curiosity and skepticism is required with using scientific attitude practices. An awareness of our own vulnerability to error and an openness to surprises and new perspectives is needed so that the truth is seen in response to our questioning. The fact that we need to lay aside our preconceptions and be open to something else all together, gives us a more realistic result.
Critical thinking is just smart thinking. It causes us to examine assumptions, discerns hidden values, evaluates evidence, and assesses conclusions. Critical thinking helps us to filter out the stuff from our biases.

HOW DO PSYCHOLOGISTS ASK AND ANSWER QUESTIONS?
1-3: How do theories advance psychological science?
A good theory produces testable predictions called Hypotheses. Hypothesis is a testable prediction often implied by a theory. It answers questions such as “What results are needed to prove this theory or disprove this theory?” In a research, psychologist can report their findings with operational definitions of the procedures and concepts they used. These definitions are carefully worded so that the research can be replicated with different groups or materials. If they get similar results by using different materials, confidence in that finding grows.
The theory is useful if organizes a range of self reports and observations and implies predictions that anyone can use to check the theory or to derive practical applications..

1-4: How do psychologists us case studies, naturalistic observation and surveys to observe and describe behavior and why is random sampling important?
The starting point of any science is description. Psychologist looks at situations more objectively and systematically through different ways of observations. Case studies examine one individual in depth in order to answer questions about who we all are as a whole. To discern the general truths that cover individual cases, we must answer questions with other research methods.
Other than case studies, a second descriptive method is used to record behaviors in their natural environments. The naturalistic observations do not explain behavior, it only describes it.
Another descriptive method used to record behaviors or opinions is through surveys. The results are tricky because it matters how the questions are worded and how the respondents are chosen. Because wording is such a delicate matter, critical thinkers will often reflect on how the phrasing of a question might affect peoples expressed opinions. Random sampling in surveys effect results as well. The best basis for generalizing is from a representative sample, which means every person in your group of study would have an equal chance in participating. Yet, remember when accepting survey findings, think critically. Consider where the sample came from.

1-5: What are positive and negative correlations, and why do they enable prediction but not cause-effect explanations?
Describing behavior is a first step in predicting it. When we have tow cases that may relate to each other we say that the two correlate. The measure of statistics or correlation coefficient helps to figure out how closely two things vary together and thus, how well either one predicts the other. Questions like “How closely related are the personality scores of identical twins?” and “How closely related is stress to sickness or disease?” To help determine the results scatterplots can be revealing.
A correlation is positive if two sets of scores tend to rise or fall together.
A correlation is negative if two sets of scores relate inversely one set going up and the other goes down.

Association does not prove causation. Correlation indicates only the possibility of a cause-effect relationship but does not prove such.

1-6: What are the characteristics of experimentation that make it possible to isolate cause and effect?
To isolate cause and effect, researchers can experiment. Experiments help researches to isolate the effects of one or more factors by (1) manipulating the factors of interest and (2) holding constant (“controlling”) other factors. To do this they create experimental groups in which people receive the treatment and a contrasting group that does not receive the treatment. By randomly assigning people to each group they can minimize any preexisting differences that are between the two groups. An experiment manipulates a factor to determine its effect.

STATISTICAL REASONING IN EVERYDAY LIFE
1-7: How can we describe data with measure of central tendency and variation?
After gathering data from research, that information must be organized. One way to do this is in the bar graph, the way you can make the difference in the data appear small or large is by being careful what information goes on the Y-axis (or vertical scale).
After organizing your data into a graph you now need to summarize it using some measure of tendency. This gives a single scare that represents a whole set of scores.
The simplest measure is the mode, the most frequently occurring score or scores.
The most commonly reported measure is the mean, or the total sum of all the scores divided by the number of scores.
The median is the middle point the 50% area.
To neatly summarize data we use measures of central tendency.

When scores of data summarized show how similar or diverse it is, it shows the amount of variation.
The range of scores shows the gap between the lowest and highest scores, this shows only a crude estimate of variation.
Standard deviation better gauges whether scores are packed together or dispersed, it uses info from each score.
Standard deviation when graphed often for a symmetrical, bell shaped distribution. Most cases will fall near the mean and fewer on each extreme. We call this bell shape the normal curve.

1-8: How do we know whether an observed difference can be generalized to other populations?
For guidance we can ask how reliable and significant the differences are in the data.
Three things to keep in mind:
1. Representative samples are better than biased samples. – Pay attention to what population a study has sampled.
2. Less-variable observations are more reliable than those that are more variable. – An average is more reliable when it comes from the scores with low variability.
3. More cases are better than few.- More accurate results are found when more cases have given data.

Statistical testing can eliminate the probability of the result occurring by chance. When two averages from two samples are each reliable measure of their populations, then their difference is likely to be reliable as well.
When the difference between the sample averages is large, we have even more confidence that the difference between them reflects a real difference in their populations. We call this statistical significance.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT PSYCHOLOGY 1-9: Can laboratory experiments illuminate everyday life? The experimenters intend the laboratory environment to be a simplified reality, one that simulates and controls important features of everyday life. It doesn’t re-create behaviors of everyday life but it test theoretical principles. It is the resulting principles-not the specific findings-that help explain everyday behaviors.

1-10: Does behavior depend on one’s culture and gender?
Our culture shapes our behavior because culture is shared ideas and behaviors that one generation passes on to the next. Gender matters also, and helps to shape our behavior. Knowing the difference that gender creates, can help prevent conflicts and misunderstanding in everyday relationships. Yet, biologically women and men are the same quite similar, when comparing information such as age of walking, or if we feel hunger pains, desire, and fear.

1-11: Why do psychologists study animals, and what ethical guidelines safeguard human and animal research participants?
Psychologist study animals to understand how different species learn, think, and behave. Psychologist also can learn about people by studying animals. Psychology concerned for humans and sensitive to animals serves the welfare of both. Heated debates brought up questions such as, ” Is it right to place the well-being of humans over the well-being of animals?” and “Is our use of animals and consumption of animals natural as a carnivorous humans that we are?”
Many surveys of animal researchers have proven that they too believe in safeguarding the animals and also support regulations providing for the humane care of research animals. Even research companies have placed their own guidelines in place. Many universities also have ethics committees that screen research proposals and safeguards participants’ well-being.

1-12: Is psychology free of value judgments?
Psychology is not value free. Values affect what we study, how we study it, and how we interpret results. Each researchers’ values will influence their choice of topics. Values can also cloud “the facts“, by our preconceptions, we bias our observations and interpretations on what we want, or expect to see happen.

A science of behavior and mental processes can help us reach our goals, but it cannot decide what those goals should be.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Critical thinking is analyzing and evaluating the information that one has. After evaluating the information one will have a clear view of what is the next step to make and will has a good judgment.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluating aspects from a scientific perspective is not limited to only people who are pursuing science as a career or major. Atul Gawande, respected surgeon and author, understands this concept well and works to encourage the public to trust in testing a hypothesis no matter how profound. Through utilizing the strategies of incorporating personal experience, rhetorical questions, and a motivational tone, Gawande’s article, The Mistrust of Science, pushes readers to face challenges without a doubt.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chemistry and Society

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    · Explain how you may apply the scientific method in your daily life and in your future career…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skills

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The scientific method has evolved, over many centuries, to ensure that scientists make meaningful discoveries, founded upon logic and reason rather than emotion.…

    • 615 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all scientific paradigms are correct. In order to understand, there must be experiments to prove whether a hypothesis is correct or incorrect.To prove whether a hypothesis is correct there must be physical evidence. In this lab will be looking at the different scientific paradigms to see if they are correct. In this lab we conducted a scientific test of astrological predictions, test for psychic abilities, test the conception that quartz has on curative properties, and formulate an experiment to test the conception that a good luck charm will affect the outcome of future events.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    An evaluation of the view that; people act as ‘lay scientists’ in interpreting their social world, perceiving and analysing information in an objective, rational manner.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hundreds of years ago determining the outcome of an event or situation was somewhat easier than it is in our present day society. As our world and time evolved so did the people which inhabit it. Going from Point A to Point B is very rarely a straight line anymore, the path is often filled with twists and turns that could end up leading to a point you never saw coming. In psychology especially lies a wide range of topics and concepts that can lead to inaccurate perceptions, cognitions, and conclusions of certain situations. Ideas such as the afterimage effect, availability heuristic, ethnocentrism, groupthink, the lack of object permanence, non-random assignment of research participants, optimistic explanatory style, and proactive interference are all subjects that tend to skew one’s original perspective or path.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, John M. Barry uses antithesis to display a contrast in his thoughts and the assuming thoughts of the readers. In doing this, the author is not only able to show the readers the different sides of how scientists are perceived by people, but as well as how they actually are in the world of scientific research. The author collates certainty and uncertainty as an example for the readers to view that scientists of the world are just like them. Scientists contain “certainty, [which] creates strength, and uncertainty, [which] creates weakness” (Barry). In using these disparities, Barry is showing the readers that “science teaches us to doubt” (Barry). By elaborating on the concepts of certainty and uncertainty, readers are able to see…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barry presents rhetorical strategies as a means to characterize scientific research. He thinks that being a “scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” Scientific research can be courageous and dangerous. In science, people tend to doubt scientists because their discoveries it seems unreal. Even scientists such as Einstein probably doubted his own theory until his predictions were tested.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists go through a lot of uncertainty, trial, and error in their daily work. An article from “The Great Influenza” written by John Barry, observe scientists and analyze how they deal with uncertainty in their work. Scientists deal with uncertainty everyday in their work. Certainty can make people more confident, knowing that something is guaranteed to go right gives everyone strength. Many people can agree that, “Certainty gives one something upon which to lean.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recognizing that personal and cultural beliefs influence both our perceptions and our interpretations of natural phenomena, we aim through the use of standard procedures and criteria to minimize those influences when developing a theory. As a famous scientist once said, "Smart people (like smart lawyers) can come up with very good explanations for mistaken points of view." In summary, the scientific method attempts to minimize the influence of bias or prejudice in the experimenter when testing an hypothesis or a theory.…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Science Essay

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Most of the things we know about human´s behaviour has come out because of the different psychological theories. We may question why there are so many different psychological perspectives, which one is right and which one is wrong. Most Psychologists nowadays would say that none of the theories are correct. However, in the early days, the Psychologists would agree that all the theories were the only truly scientific one.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ENTM 105

    • 681 Words
    • 5 Pages

    - Predictions are always important in making scientific conclusions because one has to always be…

    • 681 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a general rule, critical thinking involves developing some emotional and intellectual distance between yourself and ideas whether you’re own or others in order to better evaluate their truth, validity, and reasonableness. Critical thinking is an effort to develop reliable, rational evaluations about what is reasonable for us to believe and disbelieve. Critical thinking makes use of the tools of logic and science because it values skepticism over gullibility or dogmatism, reason over faith, science of pseudoscience, and rationality over wishful thinking. Critical thinking does not guarantee that we will arrive at truth, but it does make it much more likely than any of the alternatives do.…

    • 764 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The natural sciences are an area of knowledge which have significantly impacted our perception of the natural world. The natural sciences denote subjects such as physics, biology and chemistry. From my perspective, the natural sciences are an area of knowledge independent of culture. In order to reach this conclusion, I examined the scientific method. The scientific method is a method used to distinguish a science from a pseudo science ( fake science). According to the traditional picture of the scientific method, science is divided into 5 steps known as inductivism.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays