Preview

"There's the Sulphrous Pit": Female Sexuality in King Lear

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1121 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"There's the Sulphrous Pit": Female Sexuality in King Lear
“There’s the sulphurous pit:” Female Sexuality in King Lear

King Lear takes a very negative view of feminine sexuality from the first scene. In line 15 of scene 1 when Gloucester asks Kent “Do you smell a fault?” (Shakespeare, 1110), the editor’s notes indicate that “fault” can refer to either wrongdoing or female genitals. Indeed the speech between them is rife with misogyny. Gloucester goes on to say that there was “good sport,” at Edmund’s conception, and goes on to call him a “whoreson,” (Shakespeare, 1110), thus indicating that Edmund’s conception was fun for him, but bad for Edmund’s mother. It is worth mentioning here that neither Gloucester’s wife, or lover are ever mentioned again, and Lear’s wife is not in the play at all. In fact all of the noblewomen who might temper their respective husband’s anger are killed off before the play begins. The later parts of this scene reinforce the misogynistic views established earlier. When Lear calls Cordelia’s suitors before him and tells Burgundy “her price is fallen,” Burgundy refuses to take her as a wife, wanting Lear to, “Give but that portion which yourself proposed,” (Shakespeare, 1114). She is nothing to him without her dowry. In 1.4 we get Lear’s curse on Goneril,
“Hear, Nature, hear! dear goddess, hear!
Suspend they purpose, if thou didst intend
Top make this creature fruitful!
Into her womb convey sterility!
Dry up in her the organs of increase;
And from her derogate body never spring
A babe to honor her,” (Shakespeare, 1128).
This curse is overtly sexual, and it is an odd response to her behavior. She has just asked him to leave because his knights are beating her servants and asked him to send away half of his knights, and yet he attacks her womb, not her hospitality. The fact that he is cursing his own bloodline also does not seem to matter to him in his fury. What is also odd here as elsewhere is that when he calls on higher powers to curse women he calls on female goddesses.



Cited: Shakespeare, William. King Lear. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 7th ed. Vol. 1. M.H. Abrams, General Editor. WW Norton and Company, New York. 2000.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With such powerful language and intonation, it sometimes is difficult for me to remember that King Lear is but an aged man, biased and occasionally foolish. In act two, he finally ostracizes Regan and Goneril by making sexist comments intending to wound both women. His speech has three distinct parts: distinguishing men from women, making a prayer for the present, and giving his threat for the future. Lear divides the world into two parts, one with animals, and the other with humans. The latter category is then again subdivided into men and women. He sees the section of men as like beasts, but women to almost have just a superficial view of the world by only caring about looks instead of substance. He mocks Regan and Goneril with their clothing- something he calls “gorgeous”, but it “scarcely keeps [them] warm.” Lear must consider himself to be like a beast in that he acts as he sees practical, like keeping knights that stay loyal to him as the only family he has left, which are “a reservation to be followed with such a number.” I think he is stumbling over what to say the entire speech, with interrupted sentences, apostrophe, and the use of prose, which might indicate feeling rushed and lack of time in which he would usually have spoken poetry. By discussing sexism, it seems to be an easy play of Lear’s to make that will surely injure Regan and Goneril, even though both are quite masculine in their powers. In the next section, he creates another sexist divide by assigning different responses to hardship per gender. Even his speech shows his condescending beliefs for women by using the soft ‘w’ sound alliteratively in line 319. “…women’s weapons, water drops,” are contrasted with what Lear wants- “noble anger” that is more suited to him as a man. Even the thought of crying would “stain [his] man’s cheeks” in an act of weakness. While characterizing grief as womanly, Lear again associates being female as a deficiency in that one…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Female sexuality (or the lack of it) is a motif Shakespeare uncovers multiple times throughout the play. Besides Lear’s three daughters Cordelia, Regan and Goneril there are no other women in the play. Gloucester, Lear and Kent are all unmarried. Yet Lear has this obsession with women, or rather with the ungodliness he associates them with. Lear’s rage towards women begins when he demands for an undying confession of love from each of his daughters; the winner shall get the largest piece of land. His youngest daughter Cordelia proclaims to Lear “I love your majesty. According to my bond. No more nor less.” (Act 1, Scene 1 lines 102-103) Cordelia speaks the truth. Whereas Goneril and Regan lie through their teeth, claiming things such as “Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter; Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty.” (Act 1, Scene 1, lines 81-82). Lear believes the untruthful words of Goneril and Regan, and he unleashes his anger upon Cordelia. As Ian Johnson said in his…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lear’s hamartia is primarily exposed through his unappeasable need for self-appraisal. His narcissistic conduct is brought on by his need for flattery and is the reason for his vulnerability to extreme reaction. As Lear seeks self-appraisal in the first act, he is gravely disappointed in his youngest daughter’s response: “… I cannot heave / My heart into my mouth. I love your majesty / According to my bond, no more nor less.” (I.i.90-92) Her sheer honesty and refusal to give in to his test expose the King’s tragic flaw, as he acts rashly in banishing Cordelia along with his loyal friend Kent. Not only is Lear insulted by her refusal of appraisal, but his vanity inhibits him from being reasonable as he cannot accept that his daughter does not love him more than a daughter ought love her father. Lear tragically misinterprets reality and his injured pride leads him to anger, causing him to act without contemplation. The King’s unbridled fury leads to his unbearable suffering as it unfolds through further action. Through the effect of his hamartia, the King acts without reason and consequently loses his most beloved daughter.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Lit Words Essay

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shakespeare, William. Othello. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Washington Square, 1993. Print.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Linda Bamber’s essay, The Woman Reader in King Lear”, the author attempts to prove that women can identify with King Lear through a character which she creates and calls “the Other”. The “Other” is a combination of the evil of sister’s Goneril and Regan and the quiet but otherwise perfect Cordelia. When combined the three women create a force of nature that eventually the King must yield to.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William. “Henry V”. William Shakespeare: The Complete Works. Ed. Stanley Wells et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. Print.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Both Cymbeline and A Midsummer Night’s Dream (AMND) are both set in a patriarchal environment where both genders grapple for control. Valerie Traub defines the distinction between gender sex and gender behavior as “Sex refers to the . . . biological distinctions between male and female bodies. Gender refers to those meanings derived from the division of male and female . . . the attributes considered appropriate to each: ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine.’” (Valerie Traub, “Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare” p129) Patriarchy indirectly opposes this source of the meaning with male leaders moderating their control with their own male qualities. However, this thinking needed a stern control over the attribution of suitable behavior for each sex, signifying that gendered meanings “exist primarily as constructions of particular societies.” (Valerie Traub, “Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare” p129)One display of this control contained in both plays is the orderly arrangement of female sexuality, a classification distinguished from the sexual characteristics of connecting explicitly to “erotic desires and activities.” (Valerie Traub, “Gender and Sexuality in Shakespeare” p129) Margreta de Grazia claimed “nothing threatens a patriarchal and hierarchic social formation more than a promiscuous womb,” (Margreta de Grazia, “The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets,” in Shakespeare’s Sonnets: Critical Essays,p106) and pivotally, both plays examine the supposed risk of unrestrained female desire. Also, the sexual relationships existing in the Sonnets appear to subvert stereotypical gender ideas founded in the initial poems. A view held in Cymbeline by both Posthumous and the king was that the appealing neutrality of the speaker's master-mistress questions the…

    • 4830 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Shakespeare, William. "King Lear." The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 8th ed. Vol. 1.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear and Morality

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Mack, Maynard. “King Lear in Our Time.” The Tragedy of King Lear. Ed. Sylvan Barnet. Toronto: Signet Classic, 1998. 227. Print…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kunitz, Stanley, ed. "Shakespeare, William." Biography Reference Bank. The H.W. Wilson Company, n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Darke and Vicious Place”: The Dread of the Vagina in King Lear, Peter L. Rudytsky analyses what some argue is Shakespeare’s most important tragic play, “King Lear.” Rudytsky looks at the play through a feminist psychoanalytic lens to explore the misogyny behind some of the play’s key players as well as the play as a whole. That Lear is misogynist in nature (both the play and the lead character, King Lear himself) is not a new notion, as Rudytsky points out. Many before him have searched for and found hidden anti-feminist sentiments in the work. This, he also states, is partially because, “Shakespeare’s plays are written from a male perspective and depict predominantly conflicts of masculine identity” (292). From a psychoanalytical standpoint, these “perspectives” and “depictions” could be interpreted as Shakespeare’s own struggle with his masculine identity on the subconscious plane coming forth in his writing. Or, they could simply be because he was a man writing about men in what, at the time, was predominantly a man’s world. As a man, it would have been a great challenge for Shakespeare to write successfully from a female perspective on his chosen subject matter, especially at the time in which he was prominent when there was little understanding or consideration of women.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear Feminist Lens

    • 1724 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s play King Lear is one of his most famous and popular tragedies. Part of what makes King Lear so interesting is that it was written between 1603 and 1606, it has been critiqued throughout history and, yet, still remains relevant to modern day society. Dealing with themes of human nature, King Lear can be literarily analysed through many lenses to allow its critics to reflect upon the stereotypes and social norms of their own culture. Critics can particularly reflect upon gender roles; the public image of being male or female that a person presents to others. King Lear, then and now, reinforces gender roles in society. The symbols and language used are gendered, the portrayal of male and female characters reinforces sexual stereotypes, the relationships between male and female characters are imbalanced and this is reflected in their relative roles in society.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The motif of misogyny occurs throughout the play ‘Hamlet,’ it is however especially prominent in Act III Scene I, lines 135-149. Shakespeare has used negative imagery and language to portray ‘Hamlet’s’ dislike of women, for example ‘Hamlet’ in this extract curses ‘Ophelia’ that even if she is ‘as chaste as ice, as pure as snow,’ she will still be looked down upon, the imagery of ‘snow’ is often used by authors to represent virginity and is not necessary seen as being negative, Shakespeare however could have used this language to create the connotation that like ‘snow’ and ‘ice’ virginity is only temporary, and not something that will last forever, this is something that appears to frustrate and anger ‘Hamlet.’ This frustration ‘Hamlet’ has…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virtue and Evil in Macbeth

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. Simon & Schuster, 2003. Print.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays