Theories Of Virtue Ethics

Virtue is the good moral quality that a person possesses. “Virtue ethics is currently one of three major approaches in normative ethics. It may, initially, be identified as the one that accentuates the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which accentuates obligations or rules (deontology) or that which accentuates the consequences of actions (consequentialism).” [ CITATION Ros12 \l 1033 ]. There have been many different theories of virtue that have come to play over the years. In today’s society, the most popular theories are Kantianism and consequentialism. These two theories incline to concern with the categorizing of actions as either right or erroneous. “Although virtue ethics lacks in popularity, many people still cerebrate it is indispensable. Virtue ethics requires us to understand how to be transform ourselves into better people. That signifies we have to understand what is moral, how to be incentivized to be moral, and how to authentically deport morally.” [ CITATION JWG10 \l 1033 ]. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, the Epicureans, and the Stoics all have different theories of virtue. Socrates verbally expressed that erudition is virtue and therefor leading to jubilance. Plato thought we had three major components: the perspicacity,
“Aristotle’s first conclusion was partially justified through a consequential discovery—morality needs a goal (or one or more primary values). If nothing genuinely is consequential, then morality is baseless. If we optate mazuma just to make more mazuma, then the mazuma will never do any good. We require to spend the mazuma and utilize it for something worthy for its own sake. Most of our goals are nonmoral goals, such as our goal to make mazuma. Our goals are only virtuous when they lead to something genuinely good.” [ CITATION JWG10 \l 1033