Preview

Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution
Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day. Utilitarianism, Retribution and Restitution are all forms of theories of justice.
Utilitarian’s seek justice through morality, economic distribution and social welfare. Their morals are an absolute importance unlike Retribution which they advocate punishment. They focus on crimes that already have happen and like maximum punishment. They believe in an eye for an eye. On the other hand Restitution believe is service to the community and payment. Criminals pay money
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Retributive And Utilitarian Theory Of Punishment
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Difference Between Retributive And Utilitarian Theory Of Punishment

    Capital punishment as known as death penalty, means someone who should be punished in his behavior. Of course, this punishment has been abolished in the United States.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Punishment: Utility vs. Retribution
    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Punishment: Utility vs. Retribution

    The practice of punishment is part of our society and functions to maintain social order. However, there are a couple different view points regarding how to appropriately carry out punishment. Retribution and Utilitarianism are two philosophies that have very different views on the theory of punishment.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Punishment Vs Retributive Justice
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Punishment Vs Retributive Justice

    As a parent of two, I sometimes have to be the bad guy and punish my kids. I would be an irresponsible parent if I would just allow them to do what they wanted when they wanted. As the dad, I have to set rules and stand by them. I sometimes have to adjust my rules a little bit, but for the most part, most of my rules will stay the same. When you do not follow the regulations, punishments are to follow. Some penalties are more severe than others. Therefore, the penalties are more severe. There are even times where I punish my older son to send a message to my younger son. He is a little younger and has to be reminded of the rules in place even for him. The situations that I battle with in my household are situations that are faced by communities…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Justice Vs Restorative Justice
    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page

    Criminal Justice Vs Restorative Justice

    According to Shapland (2011) Justice is defined as the quality of being righteous, fair; equitableness or moral correctness. Justice is a term that can be very tricky and many people have often and easily confused with or used interchangeably with the term fairness. In most circumstances, whether at your workplace, your school, your local pub, or in the courtroom, people want to believe that they always want to feel that they deserve and are owed to be treated fairly after being wronged. There are two different types of justice such as Restorative Justice and Retributive Justice. Restorative justice has recently become a very popular yet controversial topic. With it being such a controversial topic there have been a few key elements of the restorative justice program that have been at a longstanding debate. They key elements consist of weather restorative justice should be defined as a result or a process, whether the approach should contain some type of form of punishment, and lastly, whether the approach should contain some type or form of punishment, and lastly whether or not it should be considered as a replacement to the traditional criminal justice system or be integrated into it.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Punishment Research Paper

    By definition, retribution can mean an act with a moral vengeance on how society will make an offender suffer the same amount of suffering as the crime itself. Retribution has been playing a role in society since the beginning of the bible. In the middle ages, crime was considered an offense onto society and to God. Back then crime was an upset to society’s original order as a whole. This is how society got the idea that the crimes committed should have a punishment equal to the amount of sufferance do to the crime. This way of punishing is still being used today by the justice system.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice

    This paper will focus on retributive justice and restorative justice. Let’s begin with the definition of each. Retributive justice is a theory of justice that considers that punishment, if proportionate, is a morally acceptable response to crime. On the other hand, restorative justice is the opposite. It is a theory of justice that focuses on the needs of the victims and the offenders. So which of these should be morally right?…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Retributive, Utilitarian and Rehabilitative Justice Compared
    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Retributive, Utilitarian and Rehabilitative Justice Compared

    The three justice theories or views, which include utilitarianism, rehabilitative or a retributive style of justice, are multifaceted. It is not easy to sum the aspects of each without lengthy discussion. Therefore, I will try to maximize my efforts and offer concise answers. It is fair to note that my belief system correlates strongly with retributive style justice theory. Nevertheless, I will compare all three theories accordingly.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of A Philosophical Construct
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of A Philosophical Construct

    or allocates compensation in the case of injury or damage. Justice in this sense clearly involves the creation and enforcement of a public set of rules, but to be ‘just’ these rules must themselves have a moral underpinningThe issue of justice lies at the heart of questions about legitimacy and orderly existence, determining whether citizens are willing to accept the law as binding..Supporters of retribution may argue that in principle justice demands that the murderer’s life be forfeit in punishment for his crime; those who advocate deterrence may accept capital punishment but only when empirical evidence indicates that it will…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy of Punishment
    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophy of Punishment

    In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates has many conversations with people in order to further understand concepts such as justice and the way things are ideally supposed to be done. When I think about justice the definition that comes to mind is: the administration of a just action because of an unjust or immoral act being done by a human or group of humans. The issue of proper punishment has also been discussed in those conversations with Socrates and his peers. There must be a punishment for immoral or unjust actions committed by any human otherwise everything in our world would turn into complete chaos.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theories Of Justice Reasoning
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theories Of Justice Reasoning

    to believe that they did ‘in order to preserve their beliefs in the fairness of the…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Theories Of Justice
    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethical Theories Of Justice

    Ethics have consistently played a significant role in my life, specifically in my position as an administrator. The principles and values that administrate my day-to-day relations with people of all social, financial and ethnic levels forms the basis of who I am professionally and personally. In this course, we learned about ethical theories and theories of justice as it relates to moral rights and social justice. These theories have exerted influence on my leadership style as a middle school principal. Theory of social justice is important to me as a leader. As a leader, I am cognizant and refuse to be oblivious to the fact equity in resources and opportunities is not an option but a requirement. A major responsibility of the leader,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice Theories
    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Justice Theories

    Restitution (Compensation Theory) can satisfy both the Retributivist and Utilitarian Theories. With retributivist it takes in to the thought of not only the deserts of the criminal but also the victim. Restitution gives retributivist the ability to avoid criticism of punishment for punishments sake. When it comes to utilitarian, they see it as bringing about the possibility of more good consequences than locking up criminals for the rest of their…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    A Theory of Justice
    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A Theory of Justice

    In society, there is no greater question or importance than the relationship between the state and that of an individual. John Rawls directly addresses the issue in his famous work “A Theory of Justice”, in which he offers a comprehensive argument for an active welfare state. Rawls offers a framework based in the context of social contract theory that appears both logical and egalitarian; his conclusions appeal to both intuition and reason almost undeniably. This essay will discuss that Rawls principles conflict on the freedom of an individual and will argue that the relationship of individual liberty outweighs the importance of social equality.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Theories of Justice
    • 3965 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Theories of Justice

    A Theory of Justice is a work of political philosophy and ethics by John Rawls. It was originally published in 1971 and revised in both 1975 (for the translated editions) and 1999. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempts to solve the problem of distributive justice (the socially just distribution of goods in a society) by utilising a variant of the familiar device of the social contract. The resultant theory is known as "Justice as Fairness", from which Rawls derives his two principles of justice: the liberty principle and the difference principle.…

    • 3965 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice and Fairness
    • 2551 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Justice and Fairness

    What is justice? This may seem like a simple question to answer but for many in today’s society it is not. Individuals throughout society have their own distinctive explanation of justice. It is a word in which, to every person, has a different meaning. Although "Justice" has a vast list of meanings, it can somewhat be defined. Loosely, it can be defined as “the principal of fairness and the ideal of moral equity.”…

    • 2551 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More