Theology Of The Cross Analysis
In the Concordia Theological Quarterly written by Burnell F, Eckardt, theologians, Martin Luther and Jürgen Moltmann, state their viewpoints and opinions of theology of the cross and what role they play in Christian lives. In this essay, a summarization of Luther’s understanding of the theology of the cross is followed by Moltmann’s perspective, then comparing and contrasting their notions and giving an opinion on which idea is better.
Martin Luther’s understanding of theology of the cross is understood as: “the theology which is guided by the knowledge that God’s activity on out behalf is not what we as humans perceive” (Eckardt 20). He breaks believers of God into two categories of theologians, Luther emphasizes the perspectives of the “theologian …show more content…
I agree with him when he says that faith needs to be taken more seriously, instead of stressing the works. Even though he states works can deepen our faith, I think that in the end, they are not the biggest factor of the Christian lives.
In conclusion, Luther and Moltmann’s opinions of theology of the cross are similar in some ways, but most of them differ. Luther believes that faith is one of the most important principals in a Christians life. Moltmann’s viewpoint is that works are more important then faith because they strengthen Christian lives more then faith alone …show more content…
Mark is also broken up into two sections, the first portion (1:14-10:52) relates to Jesus’ preaching and healing around Galilee, and the second section tells more about the conflicts Jesus encounters in his life, his arrest, trial, death and resurrection. Before chapter two of Mark, Jesus is baptized by John the Baptist and calls his first disciples to follow him, and lastly he heals a man with an unclean spirit, Simon’s mother in law and cleanses a leper. These healings were just the start of miracles Jesus worked throughout the Gospel of Mark. After the chapter, Jesus heals a magnitude of others who are suffering and begins to gain attention from many of the
Martin Luther’s understanding of theology of the cross is understood as: “the theology which is guided by the knowledge that God’s activity on out behalf is not what we as humans perceive” (Eckardt 20). He breaks believers of God into two categories of theologians, Luther emphasizes the perspectives of the “theologian …show more content…
I agree with him when he says that faith needs to be taken more seriously, instead of stressing the works. Even though he states works can deepen our faith, I think that in the end, they are not the biggest factor of the Christian lives.
In conclusion, Luther and Moltmann’s opinions of theology of the cross are similar in some ways, but most of them differ. Luther believes that faith is one of the most important principals in a Christians life. Moltmann’s viewpoint is that works are more important then faith because they strengthen Christian lives more then faith alone …show more content…
Mark is also broken up into two sections, the first portion (1:14-10:52) relates to Jesus’ preaching and healing around Galilee, and the second section tells more about the conflicts Jesus encounters in his life, his arrest, trial, death and resurrection. Before chapter two of Mark, Jesus is baptized by John the Baptist and calls his first disciples to follow him, and lastly he heals a man with an unclean spirit, Simon’s mother in law and cleanses a leper. These healings were just the start of miracles Jesus worked throughout the Gospel of Mark. After the chapter, Jesus heals a magnitude of others who are suffering and begins to gain attention from many of the